Complex method to calculate objective assessments of information systems protection to improve expert assessments reliability

被引:0
|
作者
Abdenov, A. Zh [1 ]
Trushin, V. A. [1 ]
Abdenova, G. A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Novosibirsk State Tech Univ, Novosibirsk, Russia
[2] LN Gumilyov Eurasian Natl Univ, Astana, Kazakhstan
关键词
risk assessment; information security; information system; the objective assessment of the damage; SIEM nodes; information security violations;
D O I
10.1088/1742-6596/944/1/012001
中图分类号
O3 [力学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0801 ;
摘要
The paper considers the questions of filling the relevant SIEM nodes based on calculations of objective assessments in order to improve the reliability of subjective expert assessments. The proposed methodology is necessary for the most accurate security risk assessment of information systems. This technique is also intended for the purpose of establishing real-time operational information protection in the enterprise information systems. Risk calculations are based on objective estimates of the adverse events implementation probabilities, predictions of the damage magnitude from information security violations. Calculations of objective assessments are necessary to increase the reliability of the proposed expert assessments.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prophesying the reliability of cognitively complex assessments
    Nichols, P
    Kuehl, BJ
    [J]. APPLIED MEASUREMENT IN EDUCATION, 1999, 12 (01) : 73 - 94
  • [2] Critical reliability assessments of distributed field-monitoring information systems
    Hsieh, Yo-Ming
    Chen, Yen-How
    [J]. AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 26 : 21 - 31
  • [3] Expert assessments in a "multicultural" context. How to remain objective?
    Ludolph, E.
    [J]. TRAUMA UND BERUFSKRANKHEIT, 2007, 9 : S329 - S332
  • [4] A semi-analytical simulation method for reliability assessments of structural systems
    Li, GQ
    Li, JJ
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2002, 78 (03) : 275 - 281
  • [5] COORDINATION AND CORRECTION OF EXPERT ASSESSMENTS IN DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS IN CONDITIONS OF FUZZY SOURCE INFORMATION
    Korablev, N. M.
    Udovenko, S. G.
    Firas, Alzin
    [J]. RADIO ELECTRONICS COMPUTER SCIENCE CONTROL, 2005, 2 : 116 - 120
  • [6] Uncertainties in assessments of complex sediment systems
    Chapman, PM
    Birge, WJ
    Burgess, RM
    Clements, WH
    Douglas, WS
    Harrass, MC
    Hogstrand, C
    Reible, DD
    Ringwood, AH
    [J]. USE OF SEDIMENT: QUALITY GUIDELINES AND RELATED TOOLS FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF CONTAMINATED SEDIMENTS, 2005, : 687 - 744
  • [7] Are Student Self-Assessments a Valid Proxy for Direct Assessments in Efforts to Improve Information Systems Courses and Programs? An Empirical Study
    Rajkumar, T. M.
    Anderson, Paul
    Benamati, John
    Merhout, Jeffrey W.
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2011, 28 : 537 - 548
  • [8] IMPROVING PERFORMANCE AND RELIABILITY ASSESSMENTS OF AVIONICS SYSTEMS
    Marwedel, Stephan
    Fischer, Nils
    Salzwedel, Horst
    [J]. 2011 IEEE/AIAA 30TH DIGITAL AVIONICS SYSTEMS CONFERENCE (DASC), 2011,
  • [9] Bayes linear sufficiency and systems of expert posterior assessments
    Goldstein, M
    OHagan, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-METHODOLOGICAL, 1996, 58 (02): : 301 - 316
  • [10] 2, Concerning the Method and Technique of psychiatric expert Assessments
    Dukor, Benno
    [J]. SCHWEIZER ARCHIV FUR NEUROLOGIE UND PSYCHIATRIE, 1938, 42 (02): : 225 - 248