Personality and domain-specific risk taking

被引:569
|
作者
Nicholson, N
机构
[1] London Business Sch, London NW1 4SA, England
[2] Said Business Sch, Oxford, England
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
risk; personality; management; scale development; Big Five; sensation-seeking; gender; careers; finance; health;
D O I
10.1080/1366987032000123856
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The concept of risk propensity has been the subject of both theoretical and empirical investigation, but with little consensus about its definition and measurement. To address this need, a new scale assessing overall risk propensity in terms of reported frequency of risk behaviours in six domains was developed and applied: recreation, health, career, finance, safety and social. The paper describes the properties of the scale and its correlates: demographic variables, biographical self-reports, and the NEO PI-R, a Five Factor personality inventory (N=2041). There are three main results. First, risk propensity has clear links with age and sex, and with objective measures of career-related risk taking (changing jobs and setting up a business). Second, the data show risk propensity to be strongly rooted in personality. A clear Big Five pattern emerges for overall risk propensity, combining high extraversion and openness with low neuroticism, agreeableness, and conscientiousness. At the subscale level, sensation-seeking surfaces as a key important component of risk propensity. Third, risk propensity differs markedly in its distribution across job types and business sectors. These findings are interpreted as indicating that risk takers are of three nonexclusive types: stimulation seekers, goal achievers, and risk adapters. Only the first group is truly risk seeking, the others are more correctly viewed as risk bearers. The implications for risk research and management are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 176
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Predicting Domain-Specific Risk Taking With the HEXACO Personality Structure
    Weller, Joshua A.
    Tikir, Aysel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DECISION MAKING, 2011, 24 (02) : 180 - 201
  • [2] Domain-specific risk-taking among finance professionals
    Razen, Michael
    Kirchler, Michael
    Weitzel, Utz
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL AND EXPERIMENTAL FINANCE, 2020, 27
  • [3] Measurement invariance of the Domain-Specific Risk-Taking (DOSPERT) scale
    Welindt, Dillon
    Condon, David M.
    Weston, Sara J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DECISION MAKING, 2023, 36 (04)
  • [4] A Domain-Specific Risk-Taking (DOSPERT) scale for adult populations
    Blais, Ann-Renee
    Weber, Elke U.
    [J]. JUDGMENT AND DECISION MAKING, 2006, 1 (01): : 33 - 47
  • [5] Positive and negative risk-taking: Age patterns and relations to domain-specific risk-taking
    Fryt, Joanna
    Szczygiel, Monika
    Duell, Natasha
    [J]. ADVANCES IN LIFE COURSE RESEARCH, 2022, 54
  • [6] Who is a Distracted Driver? Associations between Mobile Phone Use while Driving, Domain-Specific Risk Taking, and Personality
    Sween, Madison
    Ceschi, Andrea
    Tommasi, Francesco
    Sartori, Riccardo
    Weller, Joshua
    [J]. RISK ANALYSIS, 2017, 37 (11) : 2119 - 2131
  • [7] Validation of the Domain-Specific Risk-Taking Scale in Chinese college students
    Hu, Xiaoxiao
    Xie, Xiaofei
    [J]. JUDGMENT AND DECISION MAKING, 2012, 7 (02): : 181 - 188
  • [8] Domain-Specific Risk Minimization for Domain Generalization
    Zhang, Yi-Fan
    Wang, Jindong
    Liang, Jian
    Zhang, Zhang
    Yu, Baosheng
    Wang, Liang
    Tao, Dacheng
    Xie, Xing
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 29TH ACM SIGKDD CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING, KDD 2023, 2023, : 3409 - 3421
  • [9] Spanish validation of the Domain-Specific Risk-Taking (DOSPERT-30) Scale
    Lozano, Luis M.
    Megias, Alberto
    Catena, Andres
    Perales, Jose C.
    Baltruschat, Sabina
    Candido, Antonio
    [J]. PSICOTHEMA, 2017, 29 (01) : 111 - 118
  • [10] Domain-specific risk-taking among finance professionals (vol 27, 100331, 2020)
    Razen, Michael
    Kirchler, Michael
    Weitzel, Utz
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL AND EXPERIMENTAL FINANCE, 2021, 29