The safety and biocompatibility of direct aesthetic restorative materials

被引:5
|
作者
Hatton, Paul V. [1 ]
Mulligan, Steven [1 ]
Martin, Nicolas [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Sch Clin Dent, Sheffield S10 2TA, S Yorkshire, England
关键词
GLASS-IONOMER CEMENTS; ADVERSE-REACTIONS; DENTAL MATERIALS; EXPERIENCE; UK;
D O I
10.1038/s41415-022-4198-6
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Restorative dental materials are among the most important medical devices in terms of the numbers of patients who benefit and the technical sophistication of the products. Many though contain toxic or noxious substances, including potentially sensitising resin monomers, photoinitiators, acidic polymers and glass or ceramic filler particles. Despite this, dental materials are among the safest medical devices in use today, with very few reports of adverse reactions or injuries among both patients or the dental team. This paper considers the potential for adverse reactions to dental materials, current evidence for harm and finally examines the reasons why in real-world clinical use the likelihood of an adverse event is extremely low. Medical devices regulations, responsible manufacture and clinical vigilance all appear to play important roles in ensuring that dental materials do not cause or present a risk to patients. While this excellent in-practice safety record is welcome, there is now increasing interest in the 'macro' scale biocompatibility of dental materials and their packaging in the environment, subjects that have been relatively neglected until recently. It was concluded that this should be a priority for future research and development and support is needed from governments alongside the manufacturing industry and the profession.
引用
收藏
页码:611 / 614
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The safety and biocompatibility of direct aesthetic restorative materials
    Paul V. Hatton
    Steven Mulligan
    Nicolas Martin
    [J]. British Dental Journal, 2022, 232 : 611 - 614
  • [2] Biocompatibility of restorative materials
    Hensten-Pettersen, A
    Jacobsen, N
    [J]. OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 2001, : 229 - 235
  • [3] IN-VITRO WEATHERING OF SELECTED DIRECT AESTHETIC RESTORATIVE MATERIALS
    PANOVSKI, E
    DUNCANSON, M
    COLLARD, E
    MIRANDA, F
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1994, 73 : 127 - 127
  • [4] Long-term flexural strength of three direct aesthetic restorative materials
    Azillah, MA
    Anstice, HM
    Pearson, GJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 1998, 26 (02) : 177 - 182
  • [5] GAZING INTO THE FUTURE OF AESTHETIC RESTORATIVE MATERIALS
    BOWEN, RL
    EICHMILLER, FC
    MARJENHOFF, WA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 1992, 123 (05): : 33 - 39
  • [6] A Review on Biocompatibility of Dental Restorative and Reconstruction Materials
    Paqué P.N.
    Özcan M.
    [J]. Current Oral Health Reports, 2024, 11 (1) : 68 - 77
  • [7] BIOCOMPATIBILITY TESTING OF RESTORATIVE MATERIALS INFLUENCING DENTIN AND PULP
    DEJOU, J
    REMUSAT, M
    FRANQUIN, JC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH, 1993, 27 (07): : 877 - 884
  • [8] Concepts in biocompatibility testing of dental restorative materials.
    Schmalz G.
    [J]. Clinical Oral Investigations, 1998, 1 (4) : 154 - 162
  • [9] Biocompatibility Study of Several Esthetic Dental Restorative Materials
    Suciu, Ioana
    Varlan, Constantin
    Dimitriu, Bogdan
    Soritau, Olga
    Amza, Oana
    Moldoveanu, Georgiana Florentina
    Burlibasa, Mihai
    Gheorghe, Irina
    Lazar, Veronica
    Gheorghiu, Irina
    [J]. ROMANIAN BIOTECHNOLOGICAL LETTERS, 2016, 21 (02): : 11438 - 11442
  • [10] Direct and indirect restorative materials
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 134 (04): : 463 - 472