Comparison of penalized logistic regression models for rare event case

被引:3
|
作者
Olmus, Hulya [1 ]
Nazman, Ezgi [1 ]
Erbas, Semra [2 ]
机构
[1] Gazi Univ, Stat, Ankara, Turkey
[2] Univ Kyrenia, Fac Arts & Sci, Karakum, Northern Cyprus, Turkey
关键词
Firth LR; FLIC; FLAC; Rare event; Predicted probability bias; BIAS; ESTIMATORS; REDUCTION; RATIO;
D O I
10.1080/03610918.2019.1676438
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
The occurrence rate of the event of interest might be quite small (rare) in some cases, although sample size is large enough for Binary Logistic Regression (LR) model. In studies where the sample size is not large enough, the parameters to be estimated might be biased because of rare event case. Parameter estimations of LR model are usually obtained using Newton?Raphson (NR) algorithm for Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE). It is known that these estimations are usually biased in small samples but asymptotically unbiased. On the other hand, initial parameter values are sensitive for parameter estimation in NR for MLE. Our aim of the study is to present an approach on parameter estimation bias using inverse conditional distributions based on distribution assumption giving true parameter values and to compare this approach on different penalized LR methods. With this aim, LR, Firth LR, FLIC and FLAC methods were compared in terms of parameter estimation bias, predicted probability bias and Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) for different sample sizes, event and correlation rates conducting a detailed Monte Carlo simulation study. Findings suggest that FLIC method should be preferred in rare event and small sample cases.
引用
收藏
页码:1578 / 1590
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of Bias Correction Methods for the Rare Event Logistic Regression
    Kim, Hyungwoo
    Ko, Taeseok
    Park, No-Wook
    Lee, Woojoo
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2014, 27 (02) : 277 - 290
  • [2] Logistic regression applied to natural hazards: rare event logistic regression with replications
    Guns, M.
    Vanacker, V.
    NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2012, 12 (06) : 1937 - 1947
  • [3] Fitting Penalized Logistic Regression Models Using QR Factorization
    Klimaszewski, Jacek
    Korzen, Marcin
    COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE - ICCS 2020, PT II, 2020, 12138 : 44 - 57
  • [4] PREDICTION OF THE NASH THROUGH PENALIZED MIXTURE OF LOGISTIC REGRESSION MODELS
    Morvan, Marie
    Devijver, Emilie
    Giacofci, Madison
    Monbet, Valerie
    ANNALS OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2021, 15 (02): : 952 - 970
  • [5] Identification of Grouped Rare and Common Variants via Penalized Logistic Regression
    Ayers, Kristin L.
    Cordell, Heather J.
    GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 37 (06) : 592 - 602
  • [6] Penalized logistic regression to improve predictive capacity of rare events in surveys
    Pesantez-Narvaez, Jessica
    Guillen, Montserrat
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2020, 38 (05) : 5497 - 5507
  • [7] Identification of Grouped Rare and Common Variants via Penalized Logistic Regression
    Ayers, Kristin L.
    Cordell, Heather J.
    GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2012, 36 (07) : 730 - 731
  • [8] Comparison of standard and penalized logistic regression in risk model development
    Yan, Yan
    Yang, Zhizhou
    Semenkovich, Tara R.
    Kozower, Benjamin D.
    Meyers, Bryan F.
    Nava, Ruben G.
    Kreisel, Daniel
    Puri, Varun
    JTCVS OPEN, 2022, 9 : 303 - 316
  • [9] Comparison of two generalized logistic regression models; A case study
    Kosmelj, K
    Vadnal, K
    ITI 2003: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 25TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INTERFACES, 2003, : 199 - 204
  • [10] Multiclass-penalized logistic regression
    Nibbering, Didier
    Hastie, Trevor J.
    COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 2022, 169