Defining the cutoff value of MGMT gene promoter methylation and its predictive capacity in glioblastoma

被引:49
|
作者
Brigliadori, Giovanni [1 ]
Foca, Flavia [2 ]
Dall'Agata, Monia [2 ]
Rengucci, Claudia [1 ]
Melegari, Elisabetta [3 ]
Cerasoli, Serenella [4 ]
Amadori, Dino [3 ]
Calistri, Daniele [1 ]
Faedi, Marina [3 ]
机构
[1] Ist Sci Romagnolo Studio & Cura Tumori IRST IRCCS, Biosci Lab, Via Maroncelli 40, I-47014 Meldola, Italy
[2] Ist Sci Romagnolo Studio & Cura Tumori IRST IRCCS, Unit Biostat & Clin Trials, I-47014 Meldola, Italy
[3] Ist Sci Romagnolo Studio & Cura Tumori IRST IRCCS, Dept Med Oncol, I-47014 Meldola, Italy
[4] Bufalini Hosp, Pathol Unit, Cesena, Italy
关键词
Glioblastoma; Temozolomide; MGMT promoter methylation percentage; TEMOZOLOMIDE; GLIOMA; HYPERMETHYLATION; RESECTION; SURVIVAL; EXTENT;
D O I
10.1007/s11060-016-2116-y
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Despite advances in the treatment of glioblastoma (GBM), median survival is 12-15 months. O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene promoter methylation status is acknowledged as a predictive marker for temozolomide (TMZ) treatment. When MGMT promoter values fall into a "methylated" range, a better response to chemotherapy is expected. However, a cutoff that discriminates between "methylated" and "unmethylated" status has yet to be defined. We aimed to identify the best cutoff value and to find out whether variability in methylation profiles influences the predictive capacity of MGMT promoter methylation. Data from 105 GBM patients treated between 2008 and 2013 were analyzed. MGMT promoter methylation status was determined by analyzing 10 CpG islands by pyrosequencing. Patients were treated with radiotherapy followed by TMZ. MGMT promoter methylation status was classified into unmethylated 0-9 %, methylated 10-29 % and methylated 30-100 %. Statistical analysis showed that an assumed methylation cutoff of 9 % led to an overestimation of responders. All patients in the 10-29 % methylation group relapsed before the 18-month evaluation. Patients with a methylation status a parts per thousand yen30 % showed a median overall survival of 25.2 months compared to 15.2 months in all other patients, confirming this value as the best methylation cutoff. Despite wide variability among individual profiles, single CpG island analysis did not reveal any correlation between single CpG island methylation values and relapse or death. Specific CpG island methylation status did not influence the predictive value of MGMT. The predictive role of MGMT promoter methylation was maintained only with a cutoff value a parts per thousand yen30 %.
引用
收藏
页码:333 / 339
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Defining the cutoff value of MGMT gene promoter methylation and its predictive capacity in glioblastoma
    Giovanni Brigliadori
    Flavia Foca
    Monia Dall’Agata
    Claudia Rengucci
    Elisabetta Melegari
    Serenella Cerasoli
    Dino Amadori
    Daniele Calistri
    Marina Faedi
    [J]. Journal of Neuro-Oncology, 2016, 128 : 333 - 339
  • [2] Defining the cutoff value of MGMT gene promoter methylation and its predictive capacity
    Rocca, Andrea
    Brigliadori, Giovanni
    Calistri, Daniele
    Foca, Flavia
    Dall'Agata, Monia
    Rengucci, Claudia
    Cerasoli, Serenella
    Faedi, Marina
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (15)
  • [3] Defining optimal cutoff value of MGMT promoter methylation by ROC analysis for clinical setting in glioblastoma patients
    Yuan, Guoqiang
    Niu, Liang
    Zhang, Yinian
    Wang, Xiaoqing
    Ma, Kejun
    Yin, Hang
    Dai, Junqiang
    Zhou, Wangning
    Pan, Yawen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2017, 133 (01) : 193 - 201
  • [4] Defining optimal cutoff value of MGMT promoter methylation by ROC analysis for clinical setting in glioblastoma patients
    Guoqiang Yuan
    Liang Niu
    Yinian Zhang
    Xiaoqing Wang
    Kejun Ma
    Hang Yin
    Junqiang Dai
    Wangning Zhou
    Yawen Pan
    [J]. Journal of Neuro-Oncology, 2017, 133 : 193 - 201
  • [5] Predictive impact of MGMT promoter methylation in glioblastoma of the elderly
    Reifenberger, Guido
    Hentschel, Bettina
    Felsberg, Joerg
    Schackert, Gabriele
    Simon, Matthias
    Schnell, Oliver
    Westphal, Manfred
    Wick, Wolfgang
    Pietsch, Torsten
    Loeffler, Markus
    Weller, Michael
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2012, 131 (06) : 1342 - 1350
  • [6] MGMT promoter methylation in glioblastoma
    Santosh, Vani
    Sravya, P.
    [J]. NEUROLOGY INDIA, 2018, 66 (04) : 1115 - 1116
  • [7] MGMT GENE PROMOTER METHYLATION AND TUMOR LOCATION IN GLIOBLASTOMA
    De Robles, Paula
    Adler, Daniel
    Roldan, Gloria
    Drabycz, Sylvia
    Parney, Ian
    Yan, Elizabeth
    Easaw, Jacob
    Forsyth, Peter A.
    Magliocco, Tony
    Mcintyre, J.
    Cairncross, Gregory
    Mitchell, Ross
    [J]. NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2008, 10 (05) : 861 - 861
  • [8] Predictive value of MGMT promoter methylation on the survival of TMZ treated IDH-mutant glioblastoma
    Chai, Ruichao
    Li, Guanzhang
    Liu, Yuqing
    Zhang, Kenan
    Zhao, Zheng
    Wu, Fan
    Chang, Yuzhou
    Pang, Bo
    Li, Jingjun
    Li, Yangfang
    Jiang, Tao
    Wang, Yongzhi
    [J]. CANCER BIOLOGY & MEDICINE, 2021, 18 (01) : 271 - +
  • [9] Predictive value of MGMT promoter methylation on the survival of TMZ treated IDH-mutant glioblastoma
    Ruichao Chai
    Guanzhang Li
    Yuqing Liu
    Kenan Zhang
    Zheng Zhao
    Fan Wu
    Yuzhou Chang
    Bo Pang
    Jingjun Li
    Yangfang Li
    Tao Jiang
    Yongzhi Wang
    [J]. Cancer Biology & Medicine, 2021, 18 (01) : 271 - 285
  • [10] The predictive value of partial MGMT promoter methylation for IDH-wild-type glioblastoma patients
    Torre, Matthew
    Wen, Patrick Y.
    Iorgulescu, J. Bryan
    [J]. NEURO-ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2023, 10 (02) : 126 - 131