Marginal Bone Loss Around Early-Loaded SLA and SLActive Implants: Radiological Follow-Up Evaluation Up to 6.5 Years

被引:27
|
作者
Sener-Yamaner, Isil Damla [1 ]
Yamaner, Gokhan [2 ]
Sertgoz, Atilla [3 ]
Canakci, Cenk Fatih [4 ]
Ozcan, Mutlu [5 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Aydin Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Prosthodont, Besyol Mah Inonu Cad 38, TR-34180 Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Turkiye Hosp, Dent Clin, Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Marmara Univ, Dept Prosthodont, Fac Dent, Istanbul, Turkey
[4] Ataturk Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Periodontol, Erzurum, Turkey
[5] Univ Zurich, Ctr Dent & Oral Med, Clin Fixed & Removable Prosthodont & Dent Mat Sci, Dent Mat Unit, Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
bone resorption; implant length; smoking; survival; SUBMERGED TITANIUM IMPLANTS; ACID-ETCHED SURFACE; LONG-TERM SURVIVAL; DENTAL IMPLANTS; PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTER; STRAUMANN IMPLANTS; POSTERIOR JAWS; CLINICAL-TRIAL; ORAL IMPLANTS; ITI IMPLANTS;
D O I
10.1097/ID.0000000000000625
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare marginal bone loss around early-loaded SLA and SLActive tissue-level implants (Straumann Dental Implants; Institut Straumann AG, Basel, Switzerland) after a mean of 81-month follow-up period. Material and Methods: One hundred seven SLA and 68 SLActive implants were placed in 55 patients and loaded with final restoration after 8 and 3 weeks of healing time, respectively. Marginal bone loss around implants was determined radiographically at initial and after a mean observation time ranging between 20 and 81 months. The effect of location (mandible vs maxilla), smoking habit, sex, implant length and diameter, and the type of prosthesis on the marginal bone loss was evaluated. Results: The overall cumulative survival rate was 98.2% being 99% for SLA implants and 97% for SLActive implants. After 20-month follow-up period, mean marginal bone loss values for the SLA and SLActive implants were 0.24 and 0.17 mm, respectively. After 81 months, mean marginal bone loss for the SLA and SLActive implants reached 0.71 and 0.53 mm, respectively. Marginal bone loss was affected by the length and type of implant and patients' smoking habit after a mean observation time of 20 months. However, none of the parameters had any significant effect on the marginal bone loss after a follow-up period of 81 months. Conclusion: With both SLA and SLActive implants, successful clinical results could be achieved up to 6.5 years of follow-up period.
引用
收藏
页码:592 / 599
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Marginal Bone Loss Around One-Piece Implants: A 10-Year Radiological and Clinical Follow-up Evaluation
    Kadkhodazadeh, Mahdi
    Safi, Yaser
    Moeintaghavi, Amir
    Amid, Reza
    Baghani, Mohammad Taghi
    Shidfar, Shireen
    [J]. IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2019, 28 (03) : 237 - 243
  • [2] Marginal bone loss pattern around hydroxyapatite-coated versus commercially pure titanium implants after up to 12 years of follow-up
    Schwartz-Arad, D
    Mardinger, O
    Levin, L
    Kozlovsky, A
    Hirshberg, A
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2005, 20 (02) : 238 - 244
  • [3] Marginal bone resorption around dental implants placed in grafted sinuses; an up-to-30-month clinical and radiological follow-up
    Ungor, Cem
    Guven, Anil
    Songur, Timur
    Dayisoylu, Ezher
    Kurt, Hakan
    Tosun, Emre
    Senel, Figen Cizmeci
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE PAKISTAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2013, 63 (09) : 1124 - 1128
  • [4] A Retrospective Analysis on Marginal Bone Loss around Tilted and Axial Implants in Immediate-Loaded All-On-4 with a Long-Term Follow-Up Evaluation
    Tironi, Francesco
    Orlando, Francesco
    Azzola, Francesco
    Corbella, Stefano
    Francetti, Luca Angelo
    [J]. PROSTHESIS, 2022, 4 (01): : 15 - 23
  • [5] Marginal bone loss around implants retaining hinging mandibular overdentures, at 4-, 8- and 12-years follow-up
    van Steenberghe, D
    Quirynen, M
    Naert, I
    Maffei, G
    Jacobs, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2001, 28 (07) : 628 - 633
  • [6] Clinical and radiographic evaluation of early loaded narrow-diameter implants: 3 years follow-up
    Maiorana, Carlo
    King, Paul
    Quaas, Sebastian
    Sondell, Katarina
    Worsaae, Nils
    Galindo-Moreno, Pablo
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2015, 26 (01) : 77 - 82
  • [7] Early signs of marginal bone loss around nonaxially loaded implants.
    Barbier, L
    Schepers, E
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1998, 77 : 769 - 769
  • [8] Evaluation of marginal bone loss around SLActive implants by CBCT using different implant dimensions and surgical approaches: A clinical and radiological prospective study
    Almayah, H. B. M.
    Hassan, T. A.
    Al-Jumaily, H. A.
    Al-Ghurabi, Z. H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OSSEOINTEGRATION, 2022, 14 (01) : 21 - 25
  • [9] Marginal Bone Loss at Implants: A Retrospective, Long-Term Follow-Up of Turned Branemark System® Implants
    Pikner, Solweig Sunden
    Grondahl, Kerstin
    Jemt, Torsten
    Friberg, Bertil
    [J]. CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2009, 11 (01) : 11 - 23
  • [10] Marginal Bone Resorption Around Dental Implants Placed in Alveolar Socket Preserved Sites: A 5 Years Follow-up Study
    Beretta, Mario
    Maiorana, Carlo
    Manfredini, Mattia
    Signorino, Fabrizio
    Poli, Pier Paolo
    Vinci, Raffaele
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAXILLOFACIAL & ORAL SURGERY, 2021, 20 (03): : 381 - 388