Comparative Study on Genotypic and Phenotypic Second-Line Drug Resistance Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex Isolates

被引:53
|
作者
van Ingen, Jakko [1 ,2 ]
Simons, Sami [2 ]
de Zwaan, Rina [1 ]
van der Laan, Tridia [1 ]
Kamst-van Agterveld, Miranda [1 ]
Boeree, Martin J. [2 ]
van Soolingen, Dick [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Publ Hlth & Environm RIVM, Natl TB Reference Lab, Bilthoven, Netherlands
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Nijmegen Med Ctr, Dept Pulm Dis, Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
IN-VITRO; MGIT; 960; MOXIFLOXACIN; SUSCEPTIBILITY; CAPREOMYCIN; VALIDATION; OFLOXACIN; STRAINS;
D O I
10.1128/JCM.00652-10
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The mycobacterium growth indicator tube (MGIT960) automated liquid medium testing method is becoming the international gold standard for second-line drug susceptibility testing of multidrug- and extensively drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex isolates. We performed a comparative study of the current gold standard in the Netherlands, the Middlebrook 7H10 agar dilution method, the MGIT960 system, and the GenoType MTBDRsl genotypic method for rapid screening of aminoglycoside and fluoroquinolone resistance. We selected 28 clinical multidrug-and extensively drug-resistant M. tuberculosis complex strains and M. tuberculosis H37Rv. We included amikacin, capreomycin, moxifloxacin, prothionamide, clofazimine, linezolid, and rifabutin in the phenotypic test panels. For prothionamide and moxifloxacin, the various proposed breakpoint concentrations were tested by using the MGIT960 method. The MGIT960 method yielded results 10 days faster than the agar dilution method. For amikacin, capreomycin, linezolid, and rifabutin, results obtained by all methods were fully concordant. Applying a breakpoint of 0.5 mu g/ml for moxifloxacin led to results concordant with those of both the agar dilution method and the genotypic method. For prothionamide, concordance was noted only at the lowest and highest MICs. The phenotypic methods yielded largely identical results, except for those for prothionamide. Our study supports the following breakpoints for the MGIT960 method: 1 mu g/ml for amikacin, linezolid, and clofazimine, 0.5 mu g/ml for moxifloxacin and rifabutin, and 2.5 mu g/ml for capreomycin. No breakpoint was previously proposed for clofazimine. For prothionamide, a division into susceptible, intermediate, and resistant seems warranted, although the boundaries require additional study. The genotypic assay proved a reliable and rapid method for predicting aminoglycoside and fluoroquinolone resistance.
引用
收藏
页码:2749 / 2753
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A comparative study of phenotypic and genotypic first- and second-line drug resistance testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis
    Sakhaee, Fatemeh
    Ghazanfari, Morteza
    Ebrahimzadeh, Nayereh
    Vaziri, Farzam
    Jamnani, Fatemeh Rahimi
    Davari, Mehdi
    Gharibzadeh, Safoora
    Mandjin, Fatemeh Hemati
    Fateh, Abolfazi
    Siadat, Seyed Davar
    [J]. BIOLOGICALS, 2017, 49 : 33 - 38
  • [2] Detection of First- and Second-Line Drug Resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis Clinical Isolates by Pyrosequencing
    Engstrom, Anna
    Morcillo, Nora
    Imperiale, Belen
    Hoffner, Sven E.
    Jureen, Pontus
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2012, 50 (06) : 2026 - 2033
  • [3] Phenotypic and Genotypic Analysis of Anti-Tuberculosis Drug Resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis Isolates in Myanmar
    Aung, Wah Wah
    Ei, Phyu Win
    Nyunt, Wint Wint
    Swe, Thyn Lei
    Lwin, Thandar
    Htwe, Mi Mi
    Kim, Kyung Jun
    Lee, Jong Seok
    Kim, Chang Ki
    Cho, Sang Nae
    Song, Sun Dae
    Chang, Chulhun L.
    [J]. ANNALS OF LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2015, 35 (05) : 494 - 499
  • [4] Drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates from Brazil: Phenotypic and genotypic methods
    Miyata, Marcelo
    Pavan, Fernando Rogerio
    Sato, Daisy Nakamura
    Marino, Leonardo Biancolino
    Hirata, Mario Hiroyuki
    Cardoso, Rosilene Fressati
    Fiuza de Melo, Fernando Augusto
    Zanelli, Cleslei Fernando
    Fujimura Leite, Clarice Queico
    [J]. BIOMEDICINE & PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2011, 65 (06) : 456 - 459
  • [5] Correlation between phenotypic and genotypic drug resistance to kanamycin and amikacin in clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis
    Ahmadi, Azam
    Sadrnia, Maryam
    Arjomandzadegan, Mohammad
    Titov, Leonid
    [J]. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY, 2020, 12 (05) : 503 - 504
  • [6] Characterization of phenotypic and genotypic drug resistance patterns of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from a city in Mexico
    Flores-Trevino, Samantha
    Morfin-Otero, Rayo
    Rodriguez-Noriega, Eduardo
    Gonzalez-Diaz, Esteban
    Raul Perez-Gomez, Hector
    Mendoza-Olazaran, Soraya
    Balderas-Renteria, Isaias
    Maria Gonzalez, Gloria
    Garza-Gonzalez, Elvira
    [J]. ENFERMEDADES INFECCIOSAS Y MICROBIOLOGIA CLINICA, 2015, 33 (03): : 181 - 185
  • [7] Utility of Phenotypic and Genotypic Testing in the Study of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Resistance to First-Line Anti-Tuberculosis drugs
    Alba Alvarez, Luz Maria
    Garcia Garcia, Jose Maria
    Dolores Perez Hernandez, M.
    Martinez Gonzalez, Susana
    Palacios Gutierrez, Juan Jose
    [J]. ARCHIVOS DE BRONCONEUMOLOGIA, 2017, 53 (04): : 192 - 198
  • [8] Second-line drug susceptibilities of Thai multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates
    Prammananan, T
    Arjratanakool, W
    Chailprasert, A
    Tingtoy, N
    Leechawengwong, M
    Asawapokee, N
    Leelarasamee, A
    Dhiraputra, C
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TUBERCULOSIS AND LUNG DISEASE, 2005, 9 (02) : 216 - 219
  • [9] Second-line Drug Resistance Characterization in Mycobacterium tuberculosis by Genotype MTBDRsl Assay
    Sunil Sethi
    Priyanka Agarwal
    Rajiv Khaneja
    Naresh Kumar
    Nitin Kumar
    Jagesh Chandna
    Ashutosh Nath Aggarwal
    Rakesh Yadav
    [J]. Journal of Epidemiology and Global Health, 2020, 10 : 42 - 45
  • [10] Detection of second-line drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis using oligonucleotide microarrays
    Zimenkov, Danila V.
    Antonova, Olga V.
    Kuz'min, Alexey V.
    Isaeva, Yulia D.
    Krylova, Ludmila Y.
    Popov, Sergey A.
    Zasedatelev, Alexander S.
    Mikhailovich, Vladimir M.
    Gryadunov, Dmitry A.
    [J]. BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2013, 13