Classifying the Severity of Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: A Preoperative Grading System Incorporating Electrodiagnostic Parameters

被引:4
|
作者
Power, Hollie A. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Peters, Blair R. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Patterson, J. Megan M. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Padovano, William M. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Mackinnon, Susan E. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Div Plast Surg, Dept Surg, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[2] Washington Univ, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Dept Surg, Sch Med, Washington, DC 98195 USA
[3] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Dept Surg, Portland, OR 97239 USA
[4] Univ N Carolina, Dept Orthoped Surg, Sch Med, Chapel Hill, NC 29208 USA
来源
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY | 2022年 / 150卷 / 01期
关键词
MOTOR-NERVE TRANSFER; CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE; IN-SITU DECOMPRESSION; ULNAR NERVE; ANTERIOR TRANSPOSITION; SUBMUSCULAR TRANSPOSITION; INTRINSIC FUNCTION; SUBCUTANEOUS TRANSPOSITION; DASH QUESTIONNAIRE; NEUROPATHY;
D O I
10.1097/PRS.0000000000009255
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Current classifications for cubital tunnel syndrome have not been shown to reliably predict postoperative outcomes. In this article, the authors introduce a new classification that incorporates clinical and electrodiagnostic parameters, including compound muscle action potential amplitude, to classify the preoperative severity of cubital tunnel syndrome. The authors compare this to established classifications and evaluate its association with patient-rated improvement. Methods: The authors reviewed 44 patients who were treated surgically for cubital tunnel syndrome. Patients were retrospectively classified using their proposed classification and the Akahori, McGowan-Goldberg, Dellon, and Gu classifications. Correlation of grades was assessed by Spearman coefficients and agreement was assessed by weighted kappa coefficients. Patient-reported impairment was assessed using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire before and after surgery. Results: The classifications tended to grade patients in a similar way, with Spearman coefficients of 0.60 to 0.85 (p < 0.0001) and weighted kappa coefficients of 0.46 to 0.71 (p < 0.0001). Preoperative Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores increased with severity grade for most classifications. In multivariable analysis, the authors' classification predicted postoperative Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score improvement, whereas established classifications did not. Conclusions: Established classifications are imperfect indicators of preoperative severity. The authors introduce a preoperative classification for cubital tunnel syndrome that incorporates electrodiagnostic findings in addition to classic signs and symptoms.
引用
收藏
页码:115E / 126E
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] GRADING SEVERITY OF CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME IN ELECTRODIAGNOSTIC REPORTS: WHY GRADING IS RECOMMENDED
    Sucher, Benjamin M.
    [J]. MUSCLE & NERVE, 2013, 48 (03) : 331 - 333
  • [2] Comparison of ultrasonography and electrodiagnostic study at the cubital tunnel syndrome
    Yoon, J. S.
    Kim, B. J.
    Kim, S. J.
    Sim, K. H.
    Hong, S. J.
    Kim, J. M.
    [J]. MUSCLE & NERVE, 2006, 34 (04) : 533 - 533
  • [4] MEDIAL EPICONDYLECTOMY IN CUBITAL TUNNEL-SYNDROME - AN ELECTRODIAGNOSTIC STUDY
    ROBINSON, D
    AGHASI, MK
    HALPERIN, N
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-BRITISH AND EUROPEAN VOLUME, 1992, 17B (03): : 255 - 256
  • [5] Electrodiagnostic test results in people with a working diagnosis of cubital tunnel syndrome
    Kortlever, Joost T. P.
    Brandsema, Berdien
    Gradl-Dietsch, Gertraud
    Zhao, Meijuan
    Ring, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2023, 36 : 114 - 119
  • [6] IS MEDIAL ELBOW PAIN CORRELATED WITH CUBITAL TUNNEL SYNDROME? AN ELECTRODIAGNOSTIC STUDY
    Speach, David P.
    Lee, Daniel J.
    Reed, Jeffrey D.
    Palmer, Bradley A.
    Abt, Patrick
    Elfar, John C.
    [J]. MUSCLE & NERVE, 2016, 53 (02) : 252 - 254
  • [7] The rationale for and efficacy of surgical intervention for electrodiagnostic-negative cubital tunnel syndrome
    Tomaino, MM
    Brach, PJ
    Vansickle, DP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2001, 26A (06): : 1077 - 1081
  • [8] Factors Associated With Severity of Cubital Tunnel Syndrome at Presentation
    Zhang, Dafang
    Earp, Brandon E.
    Homer, Scott H.
    Blazar, Philip
    [J]. HAND-AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR HAND SURGERY, 2023, 18 (03): : 401 - 406
  • [9] Electrodiagnostic severity does not predict short- to midterm outcomes of cubital tunnel release surgery
    Pohl, Nicholas B.
    Brush, Parker L.
    Foos, Meghan
    Alfonsi, Samuel
    Beredjiklian, Pedro K.
    Fletcher, Daniel J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2024, 33 (07) : 1593 - 1600
  • [10] Accuracy of Preoperative Ultrasonography for Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: A Comparison with Intraoperative Findings
    Cho, Chul-Hyun
    Lee, Yong-Ho
    Song, Kwang-Soon
    Lee, Kyung-Jae
    Lee, Si-Wook
    Lee, Sung-Moon
    [J]. CLINICS IN ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY, 2018, 10 (03) : 352 - 357