Preview method for electron-beam CT scanning of the coronary arteries

被引:24
|
作者
Bakhsheshi, H [1 ]
Mao, SS [1 ]
Budoff, MJ [1 ]
Bin, L [1 ]
Brundage, BH [1 ]
机构
[1] Harbor UCLA Res & Educ Inst, St Johns Cardiovasc Res Ctr, Torrance, CA 90502 USA
关键词
coronary anatomy; coronary calcification; electron-beam tomography;
D O I
10.1016/S1076-6332(00)80578-4
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Rationale and Objectives. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a method that uses electron-beam computed tomography to obtain the most appropriate starting level for complete imaging of the coronary tree and to compare it with the existing method. A second aim was to evaluate the spatial location of the coronary arteries relative to different anatomic cardiac and chest landmarks. Materials and Methods. Two hundred forty consecutive patients were randomly assigned to imaging with either a six-level preview (new) method or the traditional preview method. The accuracy of each preview method to encompass the coronary anatomy was compared. Results. All coronary arteries were included in 3-mm scans obtained starting three levels above the origin of the left main coronary artery. The left anterior descending coronary artery extended 3-9 mm above the left main artery in 33 patients (14%). The coronary arteries were encompassed by scans depicting 72-105 mm; thus, with 3-mm sections, up to 35 scans are necessary to cover the entire coronary tree. No stable relationship between the coronary arteries and the pulmonary artery or carina could be found. Conclusion. The six-level preview method that identifies the left main coronary artery and begins 9 mm above this level is the most accurate method for depicting the coronary anatomy. No anatomic landmarks in the heart or chest can be used reliably to identify the position of the coronary arteries in individual patients.
引用
收藏
页码:620 / 626
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Electron-beam CT coronary angiography: Imaging characteristics in normal coronary arteries
    Chernoff, DM
    Ritchie, CJ
    Higgins, CB
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1996, 201 : 789 - 789
  • [2] Peripheral pulmonary arteries: Electron-beam versus helical CT scanning techniques
    Schoepf, UO
    Kang, D
    Helmberger, TK
    Holzknecht, NG
    Bruening, RD
    Reiser, MF
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1998, 209P : 495 - 495
  • [3] Dual energy for material differentiation in coronary arteries using electron-beam CT
    Sengupta, S
    Jha, S
    Walter, D
    Du, YF
    Tkaczyk, EJ
    [J]. Medical Imaging 2005: Physics of Medical Imaging, Pts 1 and 2, 2005, 5745 : 1306 - 1316
  • [4] Electron-beam CT scanning for detection of coronary calcification and prediction of coronary heart disease
    Thompson, GR
    Forbat, S
    Underwood, R
    [J]. QJM-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 89 (08) : 565 - 570
  • [5] HAND DYNAMIC INJECTION IN ELECTRON-BEAM CT SCANNING
    WINDISCH, TR
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1994, 162 (02) : 471 - 471
  • [6] AN ELECTRON-BEAM CT APPROACH FOR TRANSVENOUS CORONARY ARTERIOGRAPHY
    THOMAS, PJ
    MCCOLLOUGH, CH
    RITMAN, EL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1995, 19 (03) : 383 - 389
  • [7] Intravenous electron-beam CT based angiography: Segmental analysis of significant disease in the major coronary arteries
    Schmermund, A
    Rensing, BJ
    Sheedy, PF
    Bell, MR
    Rumberger, JA
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 1997, 96 (08) : 1705 - 1705
  • [8] Noninvasive perfusion measurements in stents in coronary arteries, with electron-beam tomography
    Schimpf, SC
    Sehnert, CA
    Schmernund, A
    Erbel, R
    Seibel, RM
    Groenemeyer, DH
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1996, 201 : 207 - 207
  • [9] COMPARISONS OF ACCEPTANCE AND CALIBRATION OF A SCANNING ELECTRON-BEAM AND A SCATTERED ELECTRON-BEAM
    SWEENEY, LE
    JONES, D
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1985, 12 (04) : 533 - 533
  • [10] Electron-beam CT in the noninvasive assessment of coronary stent patency
    Pump, H
    Moehlenkamp, S
    Sehnert, C
    Schimpf, SS
    Erbel, R
    Seibel, RMM
    Groenemeyer, DHW
    [J]. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 1998, 5 (12) : 858 - 862