Pathways to the emergency department-a national, cross-sectional study in Sweden

被引:12
|
作者
Henricson, Joakim [1 ,2 ]
Ekelund, Ulf [3 ]
Hartman, Jens [1 ]
Ziegler, Bruno [4 ]
Kurland, Lisa [4 ]
Wilhelms, Daniel Bjork [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Linkoping Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Biomed & Clin Sci, Linkoping, Sweden
[2] Local Hlth Care Serv Cent Ostergotland, Dept Emergency Med, SE-58185 Linkoping, Sweden
[3] Lund Univ, Skane Univ Hosp, Dept Emergency Med, Lund, Sweden
[4] Orebro Univ, Orebro Univ Hosp, Dept Emergency Med, Orebro, Sweden
[5] Linkoping Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Biomed & Clin Sci, Div Drug Res, Linkoping, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Sweden; Triage; Emergency service; Hospital; Demography; After hours care; Delivery of health care; URGENT CARE; MORTALITY; DECISION; SERVICES;
D O I
10.1186/s12873-022-00619-3
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background Swedish Emergency Departments (EDs) see 2.6 million visits annually. Sweden has a strong tradition of health care databases, but information on patients' pathways to the ED is not documented in any registry. The aim of this study was to provide a national overview of pathways, degree of medical acuteness according to triage, chief complaints, and hospital admission rates for adult patients (>= 18 years) visiting Swedish EDs during 24 h. Methods A national cross-sectional study including all patients at 43 of Sweden's 72 EDs during 24 h on April 25th, 2018. Pathway to the ED, medical acuteness at triage, admission and basic demographics were registered by dedicated assessors present at every ED for the duration of the study. Descriptive data are reported. Results A total of 3875 adult patients (median age 59; range 18 to 107; 50% men) were included in the study. Complete data for pathway to the ED was reported for 3693 patients (98%). The most common pathway was self-referred walk-in (n = 1310; 34%), followed by ambulance (n = 920; 24%), referral from a general practitioner (n = 497; 1 3%), and telephone referral by the national medical helpline "1177" (n = 409; 10%). In patients 18 to 64 years, self-referred walk-in was most common, whereas transport by ambulance dominated in patients > 64 years. Of the 3365 patients who received a medical acuteness level at triage, 4% were classified as Red (Immediate), 18% as Orange (very urgent), 47% as Yellow (Urgent), 26% as Green (Standard), and 5% as Blue (Non-Urgent). Abdominal or chest pain were the most common chief complaints representing approximately 1/3 of all presentations. Overall, the admission rate was 27%. Arrival by ambulance was associated with the highest rate of admission (53%), whereas walk-in patients and telephone referrals were less often admitted. Conclusion Self-referred walk-in was the overall most common pathway followed by ambulance. Patients arriving by ambulance were often elderly, critically ill and often admitted to in-patient care, whereas arrival by self-referred walk-in was more common in younger patients.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Pathways to the emergency department - a national, cross-sectional study in Sweden
    Joakim Henricson
    Ulf Ekelund
    Jens Hartman
    Bruno Ziegler
    Lisa Kurland
    Daniel Björk Wilhelms
    BMC Emergency Medicine, 22
  • [2] Emergency Department Utilization by Nursing Home Residents: A National Cross-Sectional Study
    Serina, P.
    Xu, C.
    Donnelly, J.
    Amanullah, S.
    Lo, A.
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2023, 82 (04) : S24 - S25
  • [3] Cross-sectional study on emergency department management of sepsis
    Hung, Kevin K. C.
    Lam, Rex P. K.
    Lo, Ronson S. L.
    Tenney, Justin W.
    Yang, Marc L. C.
    Tai, Marcus C. K.
    Graham, Colin A.
    HONG KONG MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 24 (06) : 571 - 578
  • [4] The last frontier for global non-communicable disease action: The emergency department-A cross-sectional study from East Africa
    Ngaruiya, Christine
    Wambua, Mbatha
    Mutua, Thomas Kedera
    Owambo, Daniel
    Muchemi, Morgan
    Rop, Kipkoech
    Maciejewski, Kaitlin R.
    Leff, Rebecca
    Mutua, Mugane
    Wachira, Benjamin
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (04):
  • [5] A cross-sectional analysis of patient care pathways and profiles in a dental emergency department
    Guivarc'h, Maud
    Saliba-Serre, Berengere
    Le Coz, Pierre
    Bukiet, Frederic
    INTERNATIONAL DENTAL JOURNAL, 2020, 70 (01) : 21 - 28
  • [6] Emergency department resource utilization among nursing home residents, a National Cross-Sectional Study
    Serina, Peter T.
    Xu, Chuyun
    Baird, Janette
    Wang, Henry E.
    Donnelly, John P.
    Amanullah, Siraj
    Lo, Alexander X.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2024, 78 : 76 - 80
  • [7] Emergency Department Crowding Disparity: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study
    Cha, Won Chul
    Ahn, Ki Ok
    Shin, Sang Do
    Park, Jeong Ho
    Cho, Jin Sung
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2016, 31 (08) : 1331 - 1336
  • [8] Appropriate Antibiotic Prescribing in the Emergency Department A Cross-sectional Study
    Oomen, Patrick G. A.
    Dutilh, Jacob C.
    Logtenberg, Susan J. J.
    Sankatsing, Sanjay U. C.
    INFECTIOUS DISEASES IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2022, 30 (01)
  • [9] Dental pain in the medical emergency department: a cross-sectional study
    Currie, C. C.
    Stone, S. J.
    Connolly, J.
    Durham, J.
    JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2017, 44 (02) : 105 - 111
  • [10] Health Literacy in The Emergency Department: A Cross-sectional Descriptive Study
    Ozdemir, Serdar
    Akca, Hatice Seyma
    Algin, Abdullah
    Kokulu, Kamil
    EURASIAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2020, 19 (02) : 94 - 97