Robotically assisted left ventricular epicardial lead implantation for biventricular pacing

被引:84
|
作者
DeRose, JJ
Ashton, RC
Belsley, S
Swistel, DG
Vloka, M
Ehlert, F
Shaw, R
Sackner-Bernstein, J
Hillel, Z
Steinberg, JS
机构
[1] St Lukes Roosevelt Hosp, Div Cardiothorac Surg, New York, NY USA
[2] St Lukes Roosevelt Hosp, Div Cardiol, New York, NY USA
[3] St Lukes Roosevelt Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, New York, NY USA
[4] Columbia Univ, Coll Phys & Surg, New York, NY 10027 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00252-3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES Ventricular resynchronization might be achieved in a minimally invasive fashion using a robotically assisted, direct left ventricular (LV) epicardial approach. BACKGROUND Approximately 10% of patients undergoing biventricular pacemaker insertion have a failure of coronary sinus (CS) cannulation. Rescue therapy for these patients currently is limited to standard open surgical techniques. METHODS Ten patients with congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association class 3.4 +/- 0.5) and a widened QRS complex (184 +/- 31 ms) underwent robotic LV lead placement after failed CS cannulation. Mean patient age was 71 +/- 12 years, LV ejection fraction (EF) was 12 +/- 6%, and LV end-diastolic diameter was 7.1 +/- 1.3 cm. Three patients had previous cardiac surgery, and five patients had a prior device implanted. RESULTS Nineteen epicardial leads were successfully placed on the posterobasal surface of the LV. Intraoperative lead threshold was 1.0 +/- 0.5 V at 0.5 ins, R-wave was 18.6 +/- 8.6 mV, and impedance was 1,143 +/- 261 ohms at 0.5 V. Complications included an intraoperative LV injury and a postoperative pneumonia. Improvements in exercise tolerance (8 of 10 patients), EF (19 +/- 13%, p = 0.04), and QRS duration (152 +/- 21 ins, p = 0.006) have been noted at three to six months follow-up. Lead thresholds have remained unchanged (2.1 +/- 1.4 V at 0.5 ins, p = NS), and a significant drop in impedance (310 +/- 59 ohms, p < 0.001) has been measured. CONCLUSIONS Robotic LV lead placement is an effective and novel technique which can be used for ventricular resynchronization therapy in patients with no other minimally invasive options for biventricular pacing. (C) 2003 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
引用
收藏
页码:1414 / 1419
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Robotically assisted left ventricular epicardial lead implantation for biventricular pacing: The posterior approach
    Derose, JJ
    Belsley, S
    Swistel, DG
    Shaw, R
    Ashton, RC
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2004, 77 (04): : 1472 - 1474
  • [2] Thoracoscopic implantation of Left Ventricular epicardial pacing lead for biventricular pacing in heart failure
    Loke, I.
    Jutley, R. S.
    Waller, D.
    Chin, D.
    Skehan, J. D.
    Spyt, T. J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2006, 27 : 606 - 606
  • [3] Thoracoscopic implantation of left ventricular epicardial pacing lead for biventricular pacing in heart failure
    Jutley, R
    Loke, I
    Waller, D
    Chin, D
    Stafford, P
    Skehan, I
    Spyt, T
    [J]. HEART, 2006, 92 : A37 - A38
  • [4] Prophylactic Epicardial Left Ventricular Lead Implantation for Biventricular Pacing During Operations
    Shan, Leonard
    Buratto, Edward
    Conaglen, Paul
    Davis, Philip
    Yii, Michael
    Nixon, Ian
    Newcomb, Andrew
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2014, 97 (02): : 603 - 609
  • [5] Minimally invasive video-assisted thoracoscopic left ventricular epicardial lead implantation for biventricular pacing in a patient with persistent left superior vena cava
    Matsuno, Yukihiro
    Mori, Yoshio
    Umeda, Yukio
    Imaizumi, Matsuhisa
    Takiya, Hiroshi
    [J]. HEART AND VESSELS, 2008, 23 (04) : 289 - 292
  • [6] Minimally invasive video-assisted thoracoscopic left ventricular epicardial lead implantation for biventricular pacing in a patient with persistent left superior vena cava
    Yukihiro Matsuno
    Yoshio Mori
    Yukio Umeda
    Matsuhisa Imaizumi
    Hiroshi Takiya
    [J]. Heart and Vessels, 2008, 23 : 289 - 292
  • [7] Coronary sinus lead versus surgical epicardial left ventricular lead placement in biventricular pacing
    Kleemann, T.
    Becker, T.
    Doenges, K.
    Vater, M.
    Yildiz, O.
    Gut, B.
    Senges, J.
    Seidl, K.
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2006, 27 : 606 - 606
  • [8] Surgical epicardial left ventricular lead versus coronary sinus lead placement in biventricular pacing
    Mair, H
    Sachweh, J
    Meuris, B
    Nollert, G
    Schmoeckel, M
    Schuetz, A
    Reichart, B
    Daebritz, S
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2005, 27 (02) : 235 - 242
  • [9] MINIMALLY INVASIVE LEFT VENTRICULAR EPICARDIAL LEAD IMPLANTATION FOR BIVENTRICULAR PACING IN PATIENTS WITH HEART FAILURE; IS THIS THE BEST TREATMENT OPTION?
    Navia, J. L.
    Atik, F. A.
    Rubeloswki, J.
    Nowicki, E.
    Wallace, L.
    Reyes, K.
    Gupta, S.
    Gonzalez-Stawinski, G.
    Blackstone, Eugene H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2009, 20 : S44 - S44
  • [10] Coronary sinus spasm during left ventricular lead implantation for biventricular pacing
    Russo, Vincenzo
    De Crescenzo, Llaria
    Arnmendola, Ernesto
    Cavallaro, Ciro
    Santangelo, Lucio
    Calabro, Raffaele
    [J]. EUROPACE, 2007, 9 (07): : 528 - 530