Effects of Transport Network Slicing on 5G Applications

被引:13
|
作者
Lin, Yi-Bing [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Tseng, Chien-Chao [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wang, Ming-Hung [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Yang Ming Chiao Tung Univ NYCU, Dept Comp Sci, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan
[2] Natl Chiao Tung Univ NCTU, Hsinchu, Taiwan
[3] Natl Yang Ming Univ NYMU, Taipei, Taiwan
来源
FUTURE INTERNET | 2021年 / 13卷 / 03期
关键词
Fifth generation network (5G); Network Slicing; Internet of Things (IoT); Software-Defined Network (SDN); Massive IoT (MIoT); Critical IoT (CIoT); Programming Protocol-Independent Packet Processors (P4);
D O I
10.3390/fi13030069
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Network slicing is considered a key technology in enabling the underlying 5G mobile network infrastructure to meet diverse service requirements. In this article, we demonstrate how transport network slicing accommodates the various network service requirements of Massive IoT (MIoT), Critical IoT (CIoT), and Mobile Broadband (MBB) applications. Given that most of the research conducted previously to measure 5G network slicing is done through simulations, we utilized SimTalk, an IoT application traffic emulator, to emulate large amounts of realistic traffic patterns in order to study the effects of transport network slicing on IoT and MBB applications. Furthermore, we developed several MIoT, CIoT, and MBB applications that operate sustainably on several campuses and directed both real and emulated traffic into a Programming Protocol-Independent Packet Processors (P4)-based 5G testbed. We then examined the performance in terms of throughput, packet loss, and latency. Our study indicates that applications with different traffic characteristics need different corresponding Committed Information Rate (CIR) ratios. The CIR ratio is the CIR setting for a P4 meter in physical switch hardware over the aggregated data rate of applications of the same type. A low CIR ratio adversely affects the application's performance because P4 switches will dispatch application packets to the low-priority queue if the packet arrival rate exceeds the CIR setting for the same type of applications. In our testbed, both exemplar MBB applications required a CIR ratio of 140% to achieve, respectively, a near 100% throughput percentage with a 0.0035% loss rate and an approximate 100% throughput percentage with a 0.0017% loss rate. However, the exemplar CIoT and MIoT applications required a CIR ratio of 120% and 100%, respectively, to reach a 100% throughput percentage without any packet loss. With the proper CIR settings for the P4 meters, the proposed transport network slicing mechanism can enforce the committed rates and fulfill the latency and reliability requirements for 5G MIoT, CIoT, and MBB applications in both TCP and UDP.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Applying ACTN to Transport Network Slicing in 5G Backhaul
    Lu, Jia-Rou
    Lin, Fuchun Joseph
    Chen, Jyh-Cheng
    Chen, Chien
    [J]. 2023 IEEE FUTURE NETWORKS WORLD FORUM, FNWF, 2024,
  • [2] Network Slicing Architecture for 5G Network
    Yoo, Taewhan
    [J]. 2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY CONVERGENCE (ICTC 2016): TOWARDS SMARTER HYPER-CONNECTED WORLD, 2016, : 1010 - 1014
  • [3] A Survey of Network Slicing in 5G
    Chen, Qiang
    Liu, Cai-Xia
    [J]. 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SCIENCE AND MECHANICAL AUTOMATION (CSMA 2017), 2017, : 27 - 35
  • [4] AN OVERVIEW OF NETWORK SLICING FOR 5G
    Zhang, Shunliang
    [J]. IEEE WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, 2019, 26 (03) : 111 - 117
  • [5] Network as a Service - A Demo on 5G Network Slicing
    Pries, Rastin
    Morper, Hans-Jochen
    Galambosi, Nandor
    Jarschel, Michael
    [J]. 2016 28TH INTERNATIONAL TELETRAFFIC CONGRESS (ITC 28), VOL 1, 2016, : 209 - 211
  • [6] First Demonstration of End -to -End Network Slicing with Transport Network Coordination and Edge Cloud Applications in 5G Era
    Nakamura, Shinya
    Shiomoto, Kohei
    Sugiyama, Hyde
    Hirota, Yusuke
    Yoshikane, Noboru
    Sugawara, Kentaro
    Miyabe, Masatake
    Eguchi, Tomotaka
    Okamoto, Satoru
    Murakami, Masaki
    Hirayama, Takahiro
    Sato, Ikuo
    Roux, Thomas
    [J]. 2019 24TH OPTOELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATIONS CONFERENCE (OECC) AND 2019 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PHOTONICS IN SWITCHING AND COMPUTING (PSC), 2019,
  • [7] Network Slicing in 5G: Survey and Challenges
    Foukas, Xenofon
    Patounas, Georgios
    Elmokashfi, Ahmed
    Marina, Mahesh K.
    [J]. IEEE COMMUNICATIONS MAGAZINE, 2017, 55 (05) : 94 - 100
  • [8] Towards the quest for 5G Network Slicing
    Messaoudi, Farouk
    Bertin, Philippe
    Ksentini, Adlen
    [J]. 2020 IEEE 17TH ANNUAL CONSUMER COMMUNICATIONS & NETWORKING CONFERENCE (CCNC 2020), 2020,
  • [9] 5G Network Slicing for Digital Inclusion
    Noll, Josef
    Dixit, Sudhir
    Radovanovic, Danica
    Morshedi, Maghsoud
    Holst, Christine
    Winkler, Andrea S.
    [J]. 2018 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS & NETWORKS (COMSNETS), 2018, : 191 - 197
  • [10] NFV Enabling Network Slicing for 5G
    Chatras, Bruno
    Kwong, Steve Tsang U.
    Bihannic, Nicolas
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 20TH CONFERENCE ON INNOVATIONS IN CLOUDS, INTERNET AND NETWORKS (ICIN), 2017, : 219 - 225