Probabilistic optimal power flow in correlated hybrid wind-PV power systems: A review and a new approach

被引:59
|
作者
Aien, Morteza [1 ,2 ]
Rashidinejad, Masoud [3 ]
Firuz-Abad, Mahmud Fotuhi [2 ]
机构
[1] Grad Univ Adv Technol, Dept Energy, Kerman, Iran
[2] Sharif Univ Technol, Dept Elect Engn, CEPSMC, Tehran, Iran
[3] Shahid Bahonar Univ Kerman, Dept Elect Engn, Kerman, Iran
来源
关键词
Correlation; Probabilistic optimal power flow; Solar cell generator (SCG); Uncertainty modeling; Wind turbine generator (WTG); POINT ESTIMATE METHOD; LOAD FLOW; SCENARIO REDUCTION; UNCERTAINTY; GENERATION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2014.09.012
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Hastening the power industry reregulation juxtaposed with the unprecedented utilization of uncertain renewable energies (REs), faces power system operation with sever uncertainties. Consequently, uncertainty assessment of system performance is an obligation. This paper reviews the probabilistic techniques used for probabilistic optimal power flow (P-OPF) studies and proposes a novel and powerful approach using the unscented transformation (UT) method. The heart of the proposed method lies in how to produce the sampling points. Appropriate sampling points are chosen to perform the P-OFF with a high degree of accuracy and less computational burden compared with features of other existing methods. The proposed method can take into account the correlation between uncertain input variables. In order to examine performance of the suggested method, two case studies are conducted and obtained results are compared with those of Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) and two point estimation method (2PEM). Comparison of the results justifies the effectiveness of the proposed method with regards to both accuracy and execution time criteria. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1437 / 1446
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Probabilistic Optimal Power Flow in Correlated Hybrid Wind-Photovoltaic Power Systems
    Aien, Morteza
    Fotuhi-Firuzabad, Mahmud
    Rashidinejad, Masoud
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID, 2014, 5 (01) : 130 - 138
  • [2] Probabilistic power flow of correlated hybrid wind-photovoltaic power systems
    Aien, Morteza
    Khajeh, Morteza Gholipour
    Rashidinejad, Masoud
    Fotuhi-Firuzabad, Mahmud
    [J]. IET RENEWABLE POWER GENERATION, 2014, 8 (06) : 649 - 658
  • [3] An Optimal Capacity Allocation Scheme for the Wind-PV Hybrid Power System Based on Probabilistic Production Simulation
    Zhu, Yuan
    Jiang, Ping
    Yang, Shaojin
    [J]. 2014 IEEE CONFERENCE ON ENERGY CONVERSION (CENCON), 2014, : 277 - 282
  • [4] Artificial neural networks for controlling wind-PV power systems: A review
    Karabacak, Kerim
    Cetin, Numan
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 29 : 804 - 827
  • [5] Probabilistic Assessment of Hybrid Wind-PV Hosting Capacity in Distribution Systems
    Liu, Dichen
    Wang, Chenxu
    Tang, Fei
    Zhou, Yixi
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (06)
  • [6] A probabilistic multi-objective approach for power flow optimization in hybrid wind-PV-PEV systems
    Morshed, Mohammad Javad
    Ben Hmida, Jalel
    Fekih, Afef
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2018, 211 : 1136 - 1149
  • [7] Probabilistic optimal power flow computation for power grid including correlated wind sources
    Xiao, Qing
    Tan, Zhuangxi
    Du, Min
    [J]. IET GENERATION TRANSMISSION & DISTRIBUTION, 2024, 18 (14) : 2383 - 2396
  • [8] A new optimal power flow approach for wind energy integrated power systems
    Rahmani, Shima
    Amjady, Nima
    [J]. ENERGY, 2017, 134 : 349 - 359
  • [9] Point Estimate Method Addressing Correlated Wind Power for Probabilistic Optimal Power Flow
    Saunders, Christopher Scott
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2014, 29 (03) : 1045 - 1054
  • [10] Probabilistic Transient Stability Constrained Optimal Power Flow for Power Systems With Multiple Correlated Uncertain Wind Generations
    Xia, Shiwei
    Luo, Xiao
    Chan, Ka Wing
    Zhou, Ming
    Li, Gengyin
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2016, 7 (03) : 1133 - 1144