Forest floor bryophyte and lichen diversity in Scots pine and Norway spruce production forests

被引:15
|
作者
Petersson, Lisa [1 ]
Nilsson, Staffan [1 ]
Holmstrom, Emma [1 ]
Lindbladh, Matts [1 ]
Felton, Adam [1 ]
机构
[1] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Southern Swedish Forest Res Ctr, POB 190, SE-23422 Alnarp, Sweden
关键词
Understory vegetation; Biodiversity; Moss; Liverwort; Pinus sylvestris; Picea abies; Managed coniferous plantations; Ellenberg indicator values; UNDERSTORY VEGETATION; NITROGEN-FIXATION; INDICATOR VALUES; BOREAL; DYNAMICS; MOSS; PH; COMMUNITIES; ASSEMBLAGES; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119210
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Bryophytes and lichens are two main components of the forest floor vegetation. They provide essential ecosystem services, including nutrient recycling and water regulation. Here, we contrast the species richness, cover and community composition of forest floor bryophytes and lichens in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) and Norway spruce (Picea abies) dominated production forests. The study sites were located in the hemiboreal zone of southern Sweden, and represented early-, mid- and late rotation stands. Our aim was to examine the potential consequences for forest floor biodiversity from the decreasing use of Scots pine production forests in this region. Whereas Scots pine and Norway spruce stands did not differ in bryophyte cover, we found a higher cover of lichens in Scots pine stands, and highest in the intermediate aged stands. Also the species richness of lichens was higher in the Scots pine stands, while bryophyte species richness was higher in the Norway spruce stands. Differences in canopy cover and associated light transmittance to the forest floor appears to be important drivers for distinctive different forest floor communities in the Scots pine and Norway spruce stands, as revealed by NonMetric Multidimensional Scaling (NMDS). Mean Ellenberg indicator values for bryophytes and lichens showed that species associated with Scots pine stands were characterized by their tolerance of brighter conditions, higher insolation, and better adaptation to a continental climate. Norway spruce stands instead had a comparably larger proportion of species tolerating lower light, but also indicators of higher available nutrient levels, humidity, and pH. The outcome of the Ellenberg indicator species analysis, as well as the larger cover of lichens,and adaptations to drought found among some mosses, revealed that forest floor communities are shaped by different environmental factors in Scots pine and Norway spruce production stands. These environmental differences, and the quantified shifts in forest floor communities identified in this study, indicate the large shifts in understory bryophyte and lichen species composition and abundance that is likely to occur if Scots pine stands are converted to Norway spruce.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Litterfall production and nutrient return to the forest floor in Scots pine and Norway spruce stands in Finland
    Ukonmaanaho, Liisa
    Merila, Paivi
    Nojd, Pekka
    Nieminen, Tina M.
    BOREAL ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH, 2008, 13 : 67 - 91
  • [2] FERTILIZATION OF SCOTS PINE AND NORWAY SPRUCE IN FOREST NURSERIES
    LEDINSKY, J
    PRACE VULHM-REPORTS OF THE FORESTRY AND GAME MANAGEMENT RESEARCH INSTITUTE, 1977, (51): : 81 - 106
  • [3] Microbial activities in forest floor layers under silver birch, Norway spruce and Scots pine
    Kanerva, Sanna
    Smolander, Aino
    SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 2007, 39 (07): : 1459 - 1467
  • [4] Advance Regeneration of Norway Spruce and Scots Pine in Hemiboreal Forests in Latvia
    Luguza, Solveiga
    Snepsts, Guntars
    Donis, Janis
    Desaine, Iveta
    Baders, Endijs
    Kitenberga, Mara
    Elferts, Didzis
    Jansons, Aris
    FORESTS, 2020, 11 (02):
  • [5] Resilience of subarctic Scots pine and Norway spruce forests to extreme weather events
    Matkala, L.
    Kulmala, L.
    Kolari, P.
    Aurela, M.
    Back, J.
    AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2021, 296
  • [6] Oligolignans in Norway spruce and Scots pine knots and Norway spruce stemwood
    Willför, S
    Reunanen, M
    Eklund, P
    Sjöholm, R
    Kronberg, L
    Fardim, P
    Pietarinen, S
    Holmbom, B
    HOLZFORSCHUNG, 2004, 58 (04) : 345 - 354
  • [7] Biomass in a Norway spruce-Scots pine forest: a comparison of estimation methods
    Liu, Chunjiang
    Westman, Carl Johan
    BOREAL ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH, 2009, 14 (05): : 875 - 888
  • [8] Boron retranslocation in Scots pine and Norway spruce
    Lehto, T
    Lavola, A
    Julkunen-Tiitto, R
    Aphalo, PJ
    TREE PHYSIOLOGY, 2004, 24 (09) : 1011 - 1017
  • [9] Preservative treatment of Scots pine and Norway spruce
    Rhatigan, R
    Freitag, C
    El-Kasmi, S
    Morrell, JJ
    FOREST PRODUCTS JOURNAL, 2004, 54 (10) : 91 - 94
  • [10] Recruitment models for Norway spruce, Scots pine, birch and other broadleaves in young growth forests in Norway
    Lexerod, N
    Eid, T
    SILVA FENNICA, 2005, 39 (03) : 391 - 406