Communicating Resourcefully: A Natural Field Experiment on Environmental Framing and Cognitive Dissonance in Going Paperless

被引:10
|
作者
Gosnell, Greer K. [1 ]
机构
[1] London Sch Econ, Grantham Res Inst, Houghton St, London WC2A 2AE, England
关键词
Natural field experiment; Message framing; Cognitive dissonance; Information provision; Imagery; Resource use; Paperless billing; IMPURE ALTRUISM; SOCIAL NORMS; PUBLIC-GOODS; BEHAVIOR; CONSEQUENCES; COOPERATION; ACTIVATION; STRATEGIES; ECONOMICS; ENOUGH;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.07.020
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
In a large-scale natural field experiment comprising 38,654 customers of a renewable energy supplier in the United Kingdom, we randomize environmental information and dissonance-inducing messaging to promote an active switch from paper to online billing. We find that environmental information and imagery is ineffective in inducing behavior change. Interestingly, the dissonance-inducing messaging weakly improves uptake by 1.2 percentage points among our main sample but backfires among a subsample of individuals with doctoral educations, decreasing uptake by 6.2 percentage points relative to a control group. Contrary to the majority of the literature on gender and environmental behavior, females in our sample are less likely to switch to paperless billing.
引用
收藏
页码:128 / 144
页数:17
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] Framing manipulations in contests: A natural field experiment
    Hong, Fuhai
    Hossain, Tanjim
    List, John A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2015, 118 : 372 - 382
  • [2] Are experimental economists prone to framing effects? A natural field experiment
    Gaechter, Simon
    Orzen, Henrik
    Renner, Elke
    Starmer, Chris
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2009, 70 (03) : 443 - 446
  • [3] Campaigns and the Mitigation of Framing Effects on Voting Behavior: A Natural and Field Experiment
    Binder, Michael
    Childers, Matthew
    Johnson, Natalie
    [J]. POLITICAL BEHAVIOR, 2015, 37 (03) : 703 - 722
  • [4] Campaigns and the Mitigation of Framing Effects on Voting Behavior: A Natural and Field Experiment
    Michael Binder
    Matthew Childers
    Natalie Johnson
    [J]. Political Behavior, 2015, 37 : 703 - 722
  • [5] Nudging and corporate environmental responsibility: A natural field experiment
    Becchetti, Leonardo
    Salustri, Francesco
    Scaramozzino, Pasquale
    [J]. FOOD POLICY, 2020, 97
  • [6] Framing Flexible Spending Accounts: A Large-Scale Field Experiment on Communicating the Return on Medical Savings Accounts
    Leight, Jessica
    Wilson, Nicholas
    [J]. HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2020, 29 (02) : 195 - 208
  • [7] Can Tailored Communications Motivate Environmental Volunteers? A Natural Field Experiment
    Al-Ubaydli, Omar
    Lee, Min
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2011, 101 (03): : 323 - 328
  • [8] Monitoring and enforcement of environmental regulations Lessons from a natural field experiment in Norway
    Telle, Kjetil
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2013, 99 : 24 - 34
  • [9] Duluth Versus Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: A Natural Field Experiment on Intimate Partner Violence Diversion Programs
    Cotti, Chad
    Foster, Joshua
    Haley, M. Ryan
    Rawski, Shannon L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-APPLIED, 2020, 26 (02) : 384 - 395
  • [10] Compensation and Rewards for Environmental Services (CRES) and efficient design of contracts in developing countries. Behavioral insights from a natural field experiment
    Clot, Sophie
    Andriamahefazafy, Fano
    Grolleau, Gilles
    Ibanez, Lisette
    Meral, Philippe
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2015, 113 : 85 - 96