The dosimetric comparison and evaluation of helical tomotherapy, volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT), step-and-shoot and sliding window radiotherapy techniques in nasopharyngeal carcinoma

被引:3
|
作者
Demir, Hikmettin [1 ]
Aras, Serhat [2 ,4 ]
Buyukcizmeci, Nihal [3 ]
Yavuz, Berrin Benli [1 ]
机构
[1] Necmettin Erbakan Univ, Meram Fac Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Konya, Turkey
[2] Univ Hlth Sci Turkey, Med Imaging Programme, Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Selcuk Univ, Fac Sci, Dept Phys, Konya, Turkey
[4] Mekteb i Tibbiye ahane Haydarpasa Kulliyesi S, Tibbiye Cad 38, TR-34668 Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
Nasopharyngeal cancer; VMAT; Tomotherapy; Step-and-shoot; Sliding window; SIMULTANEOUS INTEGRATED BOOST; RADIATION-THERAPY; CONVENTIONAL IMRT; TREATMENT PLANS; NECK-CANCER; HEAD;
D O I
10.1016/j.radphyschem.2022.109987
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to dosimetrically compare treatment plans prepared with volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT), tomotherapy, step-and-shoot and sliding radiotherapy techniques in nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) and to evaluate the superiority of different techniques in routine clinical practice. Treatment plans obtained by VMAT, tomotherapy, step and shoot and sliding window techniques were evaluated for twenty NPC patients. Different treatment plans were prepared by using the simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) technique in 35 fractions of 70Gy to primary planning target volume and 56Gy to elective lymph nodes. While NPC treatment plans were obtained in four different radiotherapy techniques, 95% of the target volumes were provided with defined dose coverage and critical organs received the lowest possible dose. In addition to the doses received by target tissues and critical organs, dose delivered time, monitor unit (MU), dose homogeneity (HI) and conformity (CI) index were compared for different radiotherapy techniques. The D-95 dose coverage and lowest maximum dose values (Dmax) are better achieved in the tomotherapy technique for primary tumor and elective lymph node target volumes. However, the lowest dose coverage is obtained in the step-and-shoot technique (p < 0.05). Although the highest MU value was calculated in tomo-therapy, the lowest delivered time was also achieved in the VMAT technique. It was observed that different radiotherapy techniques had advantages and disadvantages compared to each other at certain dose-volume constraints (D-max, D-min, D-mean,D- D-1, and V-30) for organs at risk. Although the tomotherapy technique was better in target volume dose coverage, it was observed that other techniques had superiority over each other in terms of protection of organs at risk and dosimetric parameters for NPC patients.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Volumetric Modulated Arc Radiotherapy for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Dosimetric Comparison with Tomotherapy and Step-and-shoot IMRT
    Lu, S.
    Wang, C.
    Chen, L.
    Lee, J.
    Wen, S.
    Wu, J.
    Lin, Y.
    Cheng, J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 78 (03): : S816 - S816
  • [2] Single arc volumetric-modulated arc therapy is sufficient for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a dosimetric comparison with dual arc VMAT and dynamic MLC and step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiotherapy
    Zhong-Hua Ning
    Jin-Ming Mu
    Jian-Xue Jin
    Xiao-Dong Li
    Qi-Lin Li
    Wen-Dong Gu
    Jin Huang
    Yang Han
    Hong-Lei Pei
    [J]. Radiation Oncology, 8
  • [3] Single arc volumetric-modulated arc therapy is sufficient for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a dosimetric comparison with dual arc VMAT and dynamic MLC and step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiotherapy
    Ning, Zhong-Hua
    Mu, Jin-Ming
    Jin, Jian-Xue
    Li, Xiao-Dong
    Li, Qi-Lin
    Gu, Wen-Dong
    Huang, Jin
    Han, Yang
    Pei, Hong-Lei
    [J]. RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2013, 8
  • [4] Dosimetric comparisons of helical tomotherapy and step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Lee, Tsair-Fwu
    Fang, Fu-Min
    Chao, Pei-Ju
    Su, T. -J.
    Wang, Luke K.
    Leung, Stephen W.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2008, 89 (01) : 89 - 96
  • [5] Volumetric modulated arc therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A dosimetric comparison with TomoTherapy and step-and-shoot IMRT
    Lu, Szu-Huai
    Cheng, Jason Chia-Hsien
    Kuo, Sung-Hsin
    Lee, Jason Jeun-Shenn
    Chen, Liang-Hsin
    Wu, Jian-Kuen
    Chen, Yu-Lisuan
    Chen, Wan-Yu
    Wen, Shu-Yu
    Chong, Fok-Ching
    Wu, Chien-Jang
    Wang, Chun-Wei
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2012, 104 (03) : 324 - 330
  • [6] Comparison of dosimetric benefits in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients among intensity-modulated radiotherapy, volumetric-modulated arc therapy and tomotherapy
    Xiong, W.
    Guoqiang, X.
    Wang, Q.
    Xu, T.
    Cao, R.
    Zhu, L.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2021, 32 : S793 - S793
  • [7] Dosimetric comparison of helical tomotherapy treatment and step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiotherapy of retroperitoneal sarcoma
    Pezner, Richard D.
    Liu, An
    Han, Chunhui
    Chen, Yi-Jen
    Schultheiss, Timothy E.
    Wong, Jeffrey Y. C.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2006, 81 (01) : 81 - 87
  • [8] Dosimetric Comparison of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy, Step-And-Shoot, and Sliding Window IMRT for Prostate Cancer
    Schnell, E.
    Herman, T. De La Fuente
    Young, J.
    Hildebrand, K.
    Algan, O.
    Syzek, E.
    Herman, T.
    Ahmad, S.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (06)
  • [9] Dosimetric Comparison of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy, Step-And-Shoot, and Sliding Window IMRT for Prostate Cancer
    Schnell, Erich
    Herman, Tania De La Fuente
    Young, Julie
    Hildebrand, Kim
    Algan, Ozer
    Syzek, Elizabeth
    Herman, Terence
    Ahmad, Salahuddin
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 1494 : 23 - 26
  • [10] Dosimetric comparison of helical TomoTherapy treatment and step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiotherapy treatment on stereotactic radiosurgery
    Han, C
    Liu, A
    Schultheiss, T
    Pezner, R
    Chen, Y
    Wong, J
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 32 (06) : 1971 - 1971