共 50 条
Alternative approaches for confounding adjustment in observational studies using weighting based on the propensity score: a primer for practitioners
被引:359
|作者:
Desai, Rishi J.
[1
,2
]
Franklin, Jessica M.
[1
,2
]
机构:
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Pharmacoepidemiol & Pharmacoecon, 1620 Tremont St, Boston, MA 02120 USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, 1620 Tremont St, Boston, MA 02120 USA
来源:
关键词:
CAUSAL INFERENCE;
LOGISTIC-REGRESSION;
PERFORMANCE;
SELECTION;
SETTINGS;
EXPOSURE;
OUTCOMES;
COMPARE;
MODELS;
RISK;
D O I:
10.1136/bmj.l5657
中图分类号:
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100201 ;
摘要:
This report aims to provide methodological guidance to help practitioners select the most appropriate weighting method based on propensity scores for their analysis out of many available options (eg, inverse probability treatment weights, standardised mortality ratio weights, fine stratification weights, overlap weights, and matching weights), and outlines recommendations for transparent reporting of studies using weighting based on the propensity scores.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文