The relative importance of spatial vs. temporal variability in generating a conditional mutualism

被引:0
|
作者
Billick, I
Tonkel, K
机构
[1] Rocky Mt Biol Labs, Crested Butte, CO 81224 USA
[2] Truman State Univ, Kirksville, MO 63501 USA
关键词
ants; density dependence; Formica obscuripes; mutualism; conditional; Publilia modesta; spatial vs. temporal variability; treehoppers;
D O I
10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[0289:TRIOSV]2.0.CO;2
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
We explored the relative importance of temporal vs. spatial variability to the conditionality of a mutualism between the treehopper Publilia modesta and the ant Formica obscuripes. The effect of the ants on the membracids varied considerably among years. When the effect of the ants on the membracids was estimated in five sites spread over 5 km there was mixed evidence for spatial conditionality in the mutualism. Using repeated surveys of nymph number we found that the effect of the ants on nymph number varied among sites through time. When total new adult production was examined, however, no such interaction between ants and location was evident. Aggregations displayed strong negative density-dependent adult production. Thus, while in some sites ants had a greater positive effect on nymph survivorship, aggregations at those sites produced proportionately fewer adults because of negative density dependence. Density dependence reduced or eliminated spatial differences in the effect of the ants-on the membracids. Differences among sites did not explain spatial variation in the effect-of ants on nymphs or new adult production. We conclude that temporal variability is much more important than spatial variability in generating conditionality in the mutualism.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 295
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The influence of spatial and temporal scale on the relative importance of biotic vs. abiotic factors for species distributions
    King, Travis W.
    Vynne, Carly
    Miller, David
    Fisher, Scott
    Fitkin, Scott
    Rohrer, John
    Ransom, Jason, I
    Thornton, Daniel H.
    [J]. DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, 2021, 27 (02) : 327 - 343
  • [2] Temporal factorization vs. spatial factorization
    Zelnik-Manor, L
    Irani, M
    [J]. COMPUTER VISION - ECCV 2004, PT 2, 2004, 3022 : 434 - 445
  • [3] RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL SCALES IN A PATCHY ENVIRONMENT
    FAHRIG, L
    [J]. THEORETICAL POPULATION BIOLOGY, 1992, 41 (03) : 300 - 314
  • [4] Relative importance of spatial and temporal scales in a patchy environment
    Fahrig, L.
    [J]. NCASI Technical Bulletin, 1999, (781 I):
  • [5] Performance of spatial vs. temporal phase shifting in ESPI
    Burke, J
    Helmers, H
    [J]. INTERFEROMETRY '99: TECHNIQUES AND TECHNOLOGIES, 1999, 3744 : 188 - 199
  • [6] Combining spatial and temporal logics: Expressiveness vs. complexity
    Gabelaia, D
    Kontchakov, R
    Kurucz, A
    Wolter, F
    Zakharyaschev, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE RESEARCH, 2005, 23 : 167 - 243
  • [7] Temporal vs. spatial formulation of autonomous overtaking algorithms
    Karlsson, Johan
    Murgovski, Nikolce
    Sjoberg, Jonas
    [J]. 2016 IEEE 19TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS (ITSC), 2016, : 1029 - 1034
  • [8] The importance of temporal climate variability for spatial patterns in plant diversity
    Letten, Andrew D.
    Ashcroft, Michael B.
    Keith, David A.
    Gollan, John R.
    Ramp, Daniel
    [J]. ECOGRAPHY, 2013, 36 (12) : 1341 - 1349
  • [9] A multi-trait approach reveals the structure and the relative importance of intra- vs. interspecific variability in plant traits
    Albert, Cecile Helene
    Thuiller, Wilfried
    Yoccoz, Nigel Gilles
    Douzet, Rolland
    Aubert, Serge
    Lavorel, Sandra
    [J]. FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY, 2010, 24 (06) : 1192 - 1201
  • [10] Internal vs. external habit formation: The relative importance for asset pricing
    Grishchenko, Olesya V.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS, 2010, 62 (03) : 176 - 194