Vedolizumab versus Adalimumab for Moderate-to-Severe Ulcerative Colitis

被引:531
|
作者
Sands, Bruce E. [1 ]
Peyrin-Biroulet, Laurent [2 ]
Loftus, Edward V., Jr. [3 ]
Danese, Silvio [4 ]
Colombel, Jean-Frederic [1 ]
Toruner, Murat [5 ]
Jonaitis, Laimas [6 ]
Abhyankar, Brihad [7 ]
Chen, Jingjing [8 ]
Rogers, Raquel [8 ]
Lirio, Richard A. [8 ]
Bornstein, Jeffrey D. [8 ]
Schreiber, Stefan [9 ]
机构
[1] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, New York, NY 10029 USA
[2] Nancy Univ Hosp, Nancy, France
[3] Mayo Clin, Coll Med, Rochester, MN USA
[4] Humanitas Univ, Milan, Italy
[5] Ankara Univ, Sch Med, Ankara, Turkey
[6] Lithuanian Univ Hlth Sci, Kaunas, Lithuania
[7] Takeda Dev Ctr Europe, London, England
[8] Takeda Dev Ctr Amer, Cambridge, MA USA
[9] Univ Hosp Schleswig Holstein, Kiel, Germany
来源
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE | 2019年 / 381卷 / 13期
关键词
EFFICACY; THERAPY; DISEASE; SCORE;
D O I
10.1056/NEJMoa1905725
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BackgroundBiologic therapies are widely used in patients with ulcerative colitis. Head-to-head trials of these therapies in patients with inflammatory bowel disease are lacking. MethodsIn a phase 3b, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized trial conducted at 245 centers in 34 countries, we compared vedolizumab with adalimumab in adults with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis to determine whether vedolizumab was superior. Previous exposure to a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor other than adalimumab was allowed in up to 25% of patients. The patients were assigned to receive infusions of 300 mg of vedolizumab on day 1 and at weeks 2, 6, 14, 22, 30, 38, and 46 (plus injections of placebo) or subcutaneous injections of 40 mg of adalimumab, with a total dose of 160 mg at week 1, 80 mg at week 2, and 40 mg every 2 weeks thereafter until week 50 (plus infusions of placebo). Dose escalation was not permitted in either group. The primary outcome was clinical remission at week 52 (defined as a total score of <= 2 on the Mayo scale [range, 0 to 12, with higher scores indicating more severe disease] and no subscore >1 [range, 0 to 3] on any of the four Mayo scale components). To control for type I error, efficacy outcomes were analyzed with a hierarchical testing procedure, with the variables in the following order: clinical remission, endoscopic improvement (subscore of 0 to 1 on the Mayo endoscopic component), and corticosteroid-free remission at week 52. ResultsA total of 769 patients underwent randomization and received at least one dose of vedolizumab (383 patients) or adalimumab (386 patients). At week 52, clinical remission was observed in a higher percentage of patients in the vedolizumab group than in the adalimumab group (31.3% vs. 22.5%; difference, 8.8 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.5 to 15.0; P=0.006), as was endoscopic improvement (39.7% vs. 27.7%; difference, 11.9 percentage points; 95% CI, 5.3 to 18.5; P<0.001). Corticosteroid-free clinical remission occurred in 12.6% of the patients in the vedolizumab group and in 21.8% in the adalimumab group (difference, -9.3 percentage points; 95% CI, -18.9 to 0.4). Exposure-adjusted incidence rates of infection were 23.4 and 34.6 events per 100 patient-years with vedolizumab and adalimumab, respectively, and the corresponding rates for serious infection were 1.6 and 2.2 events per 100 patient-years. ConclusionsIn this trial involving patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis, vedolizumab was superior to adalimumab with respect to achievement of clinical remission and endoscopic improvement, but not corticosteroid-free clinical remission. (Funded by Takeda; VARSITY ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02497469; EudraCT number, 2015-000939-33.)
引用
收藏
页码:1215 / 1226
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Vedolizumab versus adalimumab for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis
    Tribich, Samuel
    Maurice, James
    FRONTLINE GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 11 (02) : 173 - 173
  • [2] Vedolizumab versus Adalimumab for Moderate-to-Severe Ulcerative Colitis
    Biemans, Vince B. C.
    Hoentjen, Frank
    Pierik, Marieke J.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2020, 382 (01): : 92 - 92
  • [3] Vedolizumab versus Adalimumab for Moderate-to-Severe Ulcerative Colitis REPLY
    Sands, Bruce E.
    Schreiber, Stefan
    Lirio, Richard A.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2020, 382 (01): : 93 - 94
  • [4] Sustained Clinical Remission With Vedolizumab in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Ulcerative Colitis
    Feagan, Brian G.
    Schreiber, Stefan
    Wolf, Douglas C.
    Axler, Jeffrey L.
    Kaviya, Arpeat
    James, Alexandra
    Curtis, Rebecca I.
    Geransar, Parnia
    Stallmach, Andreas
    Ehehalt, Robert
    Bokemeyer, Bernd
    Khalid, Javaria Mona
    O'Byrne, Sharon
    INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES, 2019, 25 (06) : 1028 - 1035
  • [5] Cost-effectiveness of adalimumab, infliximab or vedolizumab as first-line biological therapy in moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis
    Yokomizo, Lauren
    Limketkai, Berkeley
    Park, K. T.
    BMJ OPEN GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 3 (01):
  • [6] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF VEDOLIZUMAB FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF MODERATE-TO-SEVERE ULCERATIVE COLITIS IN THAILAND
    Sruamsiri, R.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2018, 21 : S2 - S2
  • [7] Economic evaluation of vedolizumab SC for the treatment of moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis in Canada
    Fischer, A.
    Oppe, M.
    Stypa, S.
    Lukyanov, V.
    Petrakis, I.
    JOURNAL OF CROHNS & COLITIS, 2020, 14 : S387 - S387
  • [8] The role of vedolizumab in patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis
    Shahidi, Neal
    Bressler, Brian
    Panaccione, Remo
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 9 (03) : 330 - 338
  • [9] Adalimumab Induces and Maintains Clinical Remission in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Ulcerative Colitis
    Warner, Ben
    Harris, Adam W.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2012, 143 (01) : E42 - E42
  • [10] Induction and maintenance of clinical remission by adalimumab in patients with moderate-to-severe Ulcerative Colitis
    Sandborn, William
    Van Assche, Gert
    Reinisch, Walter
    Colombel, Jean-Frederic
    D'Haens, Geert
    Wolf, Douglas
    Kron, Martina
    Tighe, Mary
    Lazar, Andreas
    Thakkar, Roopal
    INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES, 2011, 17 : S3 - S4