ORIGINALISM, THE WHY AND THE WHAT

被引：0

作者：

Alexander, Larry ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ San Diego, San Diego, CA 92110 USA

来源：

FORDHAM LAW REVIEW | 2013年 / 82卷 / 02期

关键词：

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

引用

页码：539 / 544

页数：6

共 50 条

[1] WHY THE "ORIGINALISM" IN BALKIN'S LIVING ORIGINALISM?
Baxter, Hugh
[J]. BOSTON UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW, 2012, 92 (04) : 1213 - 1223
[2] WHAT'S THE POINT OF ORIGINALISM?
Drakeman, Donald L.
[J]. HARVARD JOURNAL OF LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2014, 37 (03): : 1123 - 1150
[3] Originalism in Australia and Canada Why the Divergence?
Goldsworthy, Jeffrey
Huscroft, Grant
[J]. CANADA IN THE WORLD: COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVES ON THE CANADIAN CONSTITUTION, 2018, : 183 - 208
[4] What comparativism tells us about originalism
Weis, Lael K.
[J]. ICON-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 2013, 11 (04): : 842 - 869
[5] What's Past is Prologue: Democracy in the Age of Originalism
Kirsch, Geoffrey R.
[J]. AMERICAN LITERARY HISTORY, 2024, 36 (03) : 797 - 808
[6] Panel III: What is originalism? Introduction: A view for the legislative branch
McIntosh, DM
[J]. HARVARD JOURNAL OF LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY, 1996, 19 (02): : 317 - 319
[7] ORIGINALISM'S SUBJECT MATTER: WHY THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE IS NOT PART OF THE CONSTITUTION
Strang, Lee J.
[J]. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LAW REVIEW, 2016, 89 (03) : 637 - 671
[8] ON WHAT DISTINGUISHES NEW ORIGINALISM FROM OLD: A JURISPRUDENTIAL TAKE
Berman, Mitchell N.
Toh, Kevin
[J]. FORDHAM LAW REVIEW, 2013, 82 (02) : 545 - 576
[9] Natural-law originalism - Or why justice scalia (almost) gets it right
Kmiec, DW
[J]. HARVARD JOURNAL OF LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY, 1997, 20 (03): : 627 - 653
[10] ORIGINALISM
Sunstein, Cass R.
[J]. NOTRE DAME LAW REVIEW, 2018, 93 (04) : 1671 - 1698

← 1 2 3 4 5 →