The Use of the Behavioral Pain Scale to Assess Pain in Conscious Sedated Patients

被引:95
|
作者
Ahlers, Sabine J. G. M. [1 ]
van der Veen, Aletta M. [2 ]
van Dijk, Monique [3 ]
Tibboel, Dick [3 ]
Knibbe, Catherijne A. J. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] St Antonius Hosp, Dept Clin Pharm, NL-3440 EM Nieuwegein, Netherlands
[2] St Antonius Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol & Intens Care, NL-3440 EM Nieuwegein, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus Univ, Dept Pediat Surg, Med Ctr, Erasmus MC,Sophia Childrens Hosp, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
来源
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA | 2010年 / 110卷 / 01期
关键词
INTENSIVE-CARE-UNIT; CRITICALLY-ILL PATIENTS; HEALTH-STATUS; ANALGESIA; INTERRUPTION; VALIDATION; ADULT; ICU;
D O I
10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181c3119e
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Assessing pain in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients is a great challenge. There is a need for an adequate pain measurement tool for use in conscious sedated patients because of their questionable communicative abilities. In this Study, we evaluated the use of the Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS) in conscious sedated patients in comparison with its use in deeply sedated patients, for whom the BPS was developed. Additionally, in conscious sedated patients, the combination of the BPS and the patient-rated Verbal Rating Scale (VRS-4) was evaluated. METHODS: We performed a prospective evaluation study in 80 nonparalyzed critically ill adult intensive care unit patients. Over 2 me, nurses performed 175 observation series: 1.26 in deeply sedated patients and 49 in Conscious sedated patients. Each observation series consisted of BPS ratings (range 3-12) at 4 points: at rest, during a nonpainful procedure, at retest rest, and during a routine painful procedure. Patients in the conscious sedated state also self-reported their pain using the 4-point VRS-4. RESULTS: BPS scores during painful procedures were significantly higher than those at rest, both in deeply sedated patients (5.1 [4.8-5.5] vs 3.4 [3.3-3.5], respectively) and Conscious sedated patients (5.4 [4.9-5.9] vs 3.8 [3.5-4.1], respectively) (mean [95% confidence interval]). For both groups, scores obtained during the nonpainful procedure and at rest did not significantly differ. There was a strong correlation between nurses' BPS ratings and conscious sedated patients' VRS-4 ratings during the painful procedure (r(s) = 0.67, P < 0.001). At rest and during nonpainful procedures, 98% of the observations were rated as acceptable pain (VRS 1 or 2) by both nurses and patients. During painful procedures, nurses rated the pain higher than patients did in 169% of the observations and lower in 12% of the observations. CONCLUSION: The BPS is a valid tool for measuring pain in conscious sedated patients during painful procedures. Thus, for noncommunicative and mechanically ventilated patients, it may be regarded as a bridge between the observational scale used by nurses and the VRS-4 used by patients who are able to self-report pain. (Anesth Analg 2010;110:127-33)
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 133
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessing pain in critically ill sedated patients by using a behavioral pain scale
    Payen, JF
    Bru, O
    Bosson, JL
    Lagrasta, A
    Novel, E
    Deschaux, I
    Lavagne, P
    Jacquot, C
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2001, 29 (12) : 2258 - 2263
  • [2] Validation of a behavioral pain scale in critically ill, sedated, and mechanically ventilated patients
    Aïssaoui, Y
    Zeggwagh, AA
    Zekraoui, A
    Abidi, K
    Abouqal, R
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2005, 101 (05): : 1470 - 1476
  • [3] Validation of the Brazilian version of Behavioral Pain Scale in sedated and mechanical ventilated patients
    Santos, I.
    Nogueira Alves, I.
    Passos-Junior, D.
    Cerqueira Neto, M.
    Santana-Filho, V.
    DeSantana, J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2015, 16 (04): : S4 - S4
  • [4] Accuracy of Critical Care Pain Observation Tool and Behavioral Pain Scale to assess pain in critically ill conscious and unconscious patients: Prospective, observational study
    Severgnini P.
    Pelosi P.
    Contino E.
    Serafinelli E.
    Novario R.
    Chiaranda M.
    [J]. Journal of Intensive Care, 4 (1)
  • [5] Validation of the Brazilian version of Behavioral Pain Scale in adult sedated and mechanically ventilated patients
    Azevedo-Santos, Isabela Freire
    Nogueira Alves, Iura Gonzalez
    de Cerqueira Neto, Manoel Luiz
    Badaue-Passos, Daniel
    Santana-Filho, Valter Joviniano
    de Santana, Josimari Melo
    [J]. REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA, 2017, 67 (03): : 271 - 277
  • [6] Behavioral Pain Assessment Tool: Yet Another Attempt to Measure Pain in Sedated and Ventilated Patients!
    Pande, Rajesh K.
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2020, 24 (08) : 617 - 618
  • [7] Using Pupillary Pain Index to Assess Nociception in Sedated Critically Ill Patients
    Vinclair, Marc
    Schilte, Clotilde
    Roudaud, Florian
    Lavolaine, Julien
    Francony, Gilles
    Bouzat, Pierre
    Bosson, Jean-Luc
    Payen, Jean-Francois
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2019, 129 (06): : 1540 - 1546
  • [8] Psychometric Analysis of Behavioral Pain Scale Brazilian Version in Sedated and Mechanically Ventilated Adult Patients: A Preliminary Study
    Azevedo-Santos, Isabela F.
    Alves, Iura G. N.
    Badaue-Passos, Daniel
    Santana-Filho, Valter J.
    DeSantana, Josimari M.
    [J]. PAIN PRACTICE, 2016, 16 (04) : 451 - 458
  • [9] Validation of a Scale to assess pain in odontological patients
    Velez, Paulina
    Alvarez, Cristina
    [J]. REVISTA CES PSICOLOGIA, 2010, 3 (01): : 4 - 13
  • [10] ASSESSMENT OF PAIN IN VENTILATED ICU PATIENTS USING BEHAVIORAL PAIN SCALE
    Nidhin
    Mahmood, Syed Fazal
    Padmanabha, S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2015, 4 (101): : 16688 - 16690