Agricultural support policy in Canada: What are the environmental consequences?

被引:8
|
作者
Eagle, Alison J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Rude, James [2 ]
Boxall, Peter C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Alberta Land Inst, 515 Gen Serv Bldg, Edmonton, AB T6G 2H1, Canada
[2] Univ Alberta, Dept Resource Econ & Environm Sociol, 515 Gen Serv Bldg, Edmonton, AB T6G 2H1, Canada
[3] Duke Univ, Nicholas Inst Environm Policy Solut, Box 90335, Durham, NC 27708 USA
来源
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS | 2016年 / 24卷 / 01期
关键词
Environment; government programs; agriculture; Canada; FEDERAL CROP INSURANCE; MORAL HAZARD; FARM INCOME; REVENUE INSURANCE; CHEMICAL USE; INPUT USE; RISK; PROGRAMS; IMPACTS; EU;
D O I
10.1139/er-2015-0050
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper reviews annual government spending on Canadian agriculture that attempts to stabilize and enhance farm incomes. Over the past 5 years, 2/3 of the $3 billion spent on agriculture went into stabilization programs to support farm incomes. However, this level of support raises questions about the environmental consequences of enhanced agricultural production. Environmental impacts from agriculture are well known and addressed in US and EU policies. In contrast, Canadian government expenditures on environmental initiatives in agriculture, as a share of farm income, are more than 10 times smaller than those in the US and the EU. Nonetheless the evidence is that Canadian programs have modest impacts on production, but that chemical and fertilizer input use may be higher than in the absence of the program. One possible course of action is to introduce cross-compliance between program payments and environmental objectives. However, there are no requirements that Canadian producers receiving support comply with environmental standards. While cross-compliance could be considered in the Canadian context, policies that directly target specific environmental issues in agriculture may have greater impact.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 24
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The economics of agricultural, rural, and environmental policy in Canada: Discussion
    Furtan, WH
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1997, 79 (05) : 1525 - 1526
  • [2] Environmental standards and their linkage to support instruments of agricultural policy
    Nitsch, H
    Osterburg, B
    [J]. LANDBAUFORSCHUNG VOLKENRODE, 2004, 54 (02): : 113 - 125
  • [3] Forecasting the environmental and socioeconomic consequences of changes in the Common Agricultural Policy
    Topp, CFE
    Mitchell, M
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2003, 76 (01) : 227 - 252
  • [4] Agricultural abandonment in mountain areas of Europe: Environmental consequences and policy response
    MacDonald, D
    Crabtree, JR
    Wiesinger, G
    Dax, T
    Stamou, N
    Fleury, P
    Lazpita, JG
    Gibon, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2000, 59 (01) : 47 - 69
  • [5] Incorporating environmental consequences into national agricultural policy analysis: A regional perspective.
    Setia, P
    Hyberg, B
    de la Torre, D
    Young, D
    Atwood, J
    Faeth, P
    House, R
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1997, 79 (05) : 1692 - 1692
  • [6] Evaluating consequences of agricultural policy measures in an integrated economic and environmental model system
    Wier, M
    Hasler, B
    Andersen, JM
    [J]. ECOSYSTEMS AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT II, 1999, 2 : 113 - 122
  • [7] AGRICULTURAL POLICY FOR WHAT
    SCHULTZ, TW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FARM ECONOMICS, 1959, 41 (02): : 189 - 193
  • [8] What is the environmental potential of the post-2022 common agricultural policy?
    Roeder, Norbert
    Kraemer, Christine
    Grajewski, Regina
    Lakner, Sebastian
    Matthews, Alan
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2024, 144
  • [9] An adaptable integrated modelling platform to support rapidly evolving agricultural and environmental policy
    Harrison, Paula A.
    Beauchamp, Kate
    Cooper, Joe
    Dickie, Ian
    Fitch, Alice
    Gooday, Richard
    Hollaway, Michael
    Holman, Ian P.
    Hunt, Merryn
    Jones, Laurence
    Mondain-Monval, Thomas
    Sandars, Daniel
    Siriwardena, Gavin
    Seaton, Fiona
    Smart, Simon
    Thomas, Amy
    West, Bede
    Whittaker, Freya
    Carnell, Ed
    Matthews, Robert W.
    Neupauer, Sophie
    Saraev, Vadim
    Scheffler, Janice
    Trembath, Philip
    Vieno, Massimo
    Williams, Adrian C.
    Dunford, Robert W.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2023, 169
  • [10] Science policy and agricultural biotechnology in Canada
    Carew, R
    [J]. REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 27 (03): : 300 - 316