An evaluation of the implementation of quality improvement (QI) in primary care dentistry: a multi-method approach

被引:1
|
作者
Cassie, Heather [1 ,2 ]
Mistry, Vinay [3 ]
Beaton, Laura [1 ,2 ]
Black, Irene [4 ]
Clarkson, Janet E. [1 ]
Young, Linda [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Dundee, Sch Dent, Dundee, Scotland
[2] NHS Educ Scotland, Clin Effectiveness Workstream, Dundee, Scotland
[3] Huddersfield Royal Infirm, Maxillofacial Unit, Huddersfield, W Yorkshire, England
[4] NHS Educ Scotland West Reg, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
关键词
quality improvement; quality improvement methodologies; health services research; patient safety; patient care bundles; COLLABORATIVES;
D O I
10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000839
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives Ensuring that healthcare is patient-centred, safe and harm free is the cornerstone of the NHS. The Scottish Patient Safety Programme (SPSP) is a national initiative to support the provision of safe, high-quality care. SPSP promotes a coordinated approach to quality improvement (QI) in primary care by providing evidence-based methods, such as the Institute for Healthcare Improvement's Breakthrough Series Collaborative methodology. These methods are relatively untested within dentistry. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact to inform the development and implementation of improvement collaboratives as a means for QI in primary care dentistry. Design A multimethod study underpinned by the Theoretical Domains Framework and the Kirkpatrick model. Quantitative data were collected using baseline and follow-up questionnaires, designed to explore beliefs and behaviours towards improving quality in practice. Qualitative data were gathered using interviews with dental team members and practice-based case studies. Results One hundred and eleven dental team members completed the baseline questionnaire. Follow-up questionnaires were returned by 79 team members. Twelve practices, including two case studies, participated in evaluation interviews. Findings identified positive beliefs and increased knowledge and skills towards QI, as well as increased confidence about using QI methodologies in practice. Barriers included time, poor patient and team engagement, communication and leadership. Facilitators included team working, clear roles, strong leadership, training, peer support and visible benefits. Participants' knowledge and skills were identified as an area for improvement. Conclusions Findings demonstrate increased knowledge, skills and confidence in relation to QI methodology and highlight areas for improvement. This is an example of partnership working between the Scottish Government and NHSScotland towards a shared ambition to provide safe care to every patient. More work is required to evaluate the sustainability and transferability of improvement collaboratives as a means for QI in dentistry and wider primary care.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A multi-method quality improvement approach to systematically improve and promote the quality of national health and social care information
    McGrath, Niamh
    Foley, Barbara
    Hurley, Caroline
    Ryan, Maria
    Flynn, Rachel
    [J]. HEALTH INFORMATION MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2022, 51 (01) : 50 - 56
  • [2] Trends in the recording of anxiety in UK primary care: a multi-method approach
    Archer, Charlotte
    Turner, Katrina
    Kessler, David
    Mars, Becky
    Wiles, Nicola
    [J]. SOCIAL PSYCHIATRY AND PSYCHIATRIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2022, 57 (02) : 375 - 386
  • [3] Trends in the recording of anxiety in UK primary care: a multi-method approach
    Charlotte Archer
    Katrina Turner
    David Kessler
    Becky Mars
    Nicola Wiles
    [J]. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 2022, 57 : 375 - 386
  • [4] A multi-method evaluation of an independent dementia care service and its approach
    Pritchard, EJ
    Dewing, J
    [J]. AGING & MENTAL HEALTH, 2001, 5 (01) : 63 - 72
  • [5] Systemic evaluation: a participative, multi-method approach
    Boyd, A.
    Geerling, T.
    Gregory, W. J.
    Kagan, C.
    Midgley, G.
    Murray, P.
    Walsh, M. P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2007, 58 (10) : 1306 - 1320
  • [6] RESIDENT INPATIENT HANDOFFS: A MULTI-METHOD QUALITY IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVE
    Burton, M.
    Charlton, K.
    Estrada, C.
    Ritchie, C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2010, 58 (02) : 501 - 501
  • [7] Multi-method evaluation of a national clinical fellowship programme to build leadership capacity for quality improvement
    Toma, Madalina
    Blamey, Avril
    Mahal, Dawn
    Gray, Nicola M.
    Allison, Laura
    Thakore, Shobhan
    Bowie, Paul
    [J]. BMJ OPEN QUALITY, 2020, 9 (04)
  • [8] An anatomy of conflicts in primary care encounters: a multi-method study
    Weingarten, Michael A.
    Guttman, Nurit
    Abramovitch, Henry
    Margalit, Ruth Stashevsky
    Roter, Debra
    Ziv, Amitai
    Yaphe, John
    Borkan, Jeffrey M.
    [J]. FAMILY PRACTICE, 2010, 27 (01) : 93 - 100
  • [9] Dr QI - A quality improvement (QI) approach to designing and delivering QI training
    Krishnan, Deepa Bagepalli
    Ohize, Victor
    Baumber, Luke
    [J]. BJPSYCH OPEN, 2021, 7 : S174 - S174
  • [10] Informing implementation of quality improvement in Australian primary care
    Charlotte Hespe
    Lucie Rychetnik
    David Peiris
    Mark Harris
    [J]. BMC Health Services Research, 18