The uterine sandwich for persistent uterine atony: combining the B-Lynch compression suture and an intrauterine Bakri balloon

被引:67
|
作者
Nelson, Wendy L.
O'Brien, John M.
机构
[1] Cent Baptist Hosp, Perinatal Diagnost Ctr, Lexington, KY 40502 USA
[2] Univ Kentucky, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Lexington, KY 40506 USA
关键词
compression suture; intrauterine balloon; postpartum hemorrhage;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2006.10.887
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a combination of surgical interventions for control of postpartum hemorrhage. STUDY DESIGN: At cesarean delivery, patients with persistent bleeding from uterine atony after the administration of oxytonics were treated with the placement of a B- Lynch suture. When the B- Lynch failed, subsequent placement of an intrauterine Bakri balloon followed. This combination is termed the uterine sandwich. RESULTS: The uterine sandwich was successful for all 5 patients undergoing this approach. The median nadir hematocrit was 21.1% range 20.1% to 28%). The balloon was in place for a median duration of 11hours ( range10- 24 hours). The median volume infused into the balloon was 100 mL (range 60- 250 mL). No complications were observed. CONCLUSION: Placing an intrauterine Bakri balloon in conjunction with the B- Lynch uterine compression suture was successful in treating uterine atony.
引用
收藏
页码:e9 / e10
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Modified B-Lynch Compression Suture for Uterine Atony in a Patient with Uterine Didelphys
    Yeung, T.
    Tathem, K.
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2017, 57 : 70 - 70
  • [2] Which uterine sparing technique should be used for uterine atony during cesarean section? The Bakri balloon or the B-Lynch suture?
    Baris Kaya
    Onur Guralp
    Abdullah Tuten
    Orhan Unal
    Melih Ozgur Celik
    Askın Dogan
    [J]. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2016, 294 : 511 - 517
  • [3] Which uterine sparing technique should be used for uterine atony during cesarean section? The Bakri balloon or the B-Lynch suture?
    Kaya, Baris
    Guralp, Onur
    Tuten, Abdullah
    Unal, Orhan
    Celik, Melih Ozgur
    Dogan, Askin
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2016, 294 (03) : 511 - 517
  • [4] B-Lynch suture for the treatment of uterine atony
    Koh, E.
    Devendra, K.
    Tan, L. K.
    [J]. SINGAPORE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 50 (07) : 693 - 697
  • [5] Uterine flexion suture: modified B-Lynch uterine compression suture for the treatment of uterine atony during cesarean section
    Songthamwat, Srisuda
    Songthamwat, Metha
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2018, 10 : 487 - 492
  • [6] Modified anchored B-Lynch uterine compression suture for post partum bleeding with uterine atony
    Marasinghe, Jeevan P.
    Condous, George
    Seneviratne, Harshalal R.
    Marasinghe, Upali
    [J]. ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2011, 90 (03) : 280 - 283
  • [7] Failure of B-Lynch Compression Suture in a Patient with Couvelaire Uterus and Uterine Atony
    Aydin, Derya Sivri
    Hasanova, Mushviqe
    Goksedef, Pinar Cilesiz
    Ekmez, Murat
    Cetin, Ahmet
    [J]. HASEKI TIP BULTENI-MEDICAL BULLETIN OF HASEKI, 2016, 54 (01): : 47 - 49
  • [8] B-Lynch uterine compression sutures in the conservative surgical management of uterine atony
    Baris Kaya
    Abdullah Tuten
    Korkut Daglar
    Murat Onkun
    Seyhun Sucu
    Askin Dogan
    Orhan Unal
    Onur Guralp
    [J]. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2015, 291 : 1005 - 1014
  • [9] B-Lynch uterine compression sutures in the conservative surgical management of uterine atony
    Kaya, Baris
    Tuten, Abdullah
    Daglar, Korkut
    Onkun, Murat
    Sucu, Seyhun
    Dogan, Askin
    Unal, Orhan
    Guralp, Onur
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2015, 291 (05) : 1005 - 1014
  • [10] Uterine compression sutures for post-partum bleeding with atony; modification of the B-Lynch suture
    Marasinghe, Jeevan Prasanga
    Condous, George
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2009, 49 (01): : 67 - 70