Distortion product otoacoustic emissions provide clues to hearing mechanisms in the frog ear

被引:21
|
作者
Vassilakis, PN
Meenderink, SWF
Narins, PM
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Physiol Sci, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Physiol Sci & Organ Biol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Ecol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Evolut, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1121/1.1811571
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
2f(1)-f(2) and 2f(2)-f(1) distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) were recorded from both ears of male and female Rana pipiens pipiens and Rana catesbeiana. The input-output (I/O) curves obtained from the amphibian papilla (AP) of both frog species are analogous to I/O curves recorded from mammals suggesting that, similarly to the mammalian cochlea, there may be an amplification process present in the frog AP. DPOAE level dependence on L-1-L-2 is different from that in mammals and consistent with intermodulation distortion expectations. Therefore, if a mechanical structure in the-frog inner ear is functioning analogously to the mammalian basilar membrane, it must be more broadly tuned. DPOAE audiograms were obtained for primary frequencies spanning the animals' hearing range and selected stimulus levels. The results confirm that DPOAEs are produced in both papillae, with R. catesbeiana producing stronger, emissions than R. p. pipiens. Consistent with previously reported sexual dimorphism in the mammalian and anuran auditory systems, females of both species produce stronger emissions than males. Moreover, it appears that 2f(1)-f(2) in the frog is generated primarily at the DPOAE frequency place, while 2f(2)-f(1) is generated primarily at a frequency place around the primaries. Regardless of generation place, both emissions within the AP may be subject to the same filtering mechanism, possibly the tectorial membrane. (C) 2004 Acoustical Society of America.
引用
收藏
页码:3713 / 3726
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Distortion product otoacoustic emissions provide clues to hearing mechanisms in the frog ear
    Vassilakis, Pantelis N.
    Meenderink, Sebastiaan W. F.
    Narins, Peter M.
    [J]. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2004, 116 (06): : 3713 - 3726
  • [2] Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in the amphibian ear
    Van Dijk, Pim
    Meenderink, Sebastiaan W. F.
    [J]. Auditory Mechanisms: Processes and Models, 2006, : 332 - 338
  • [4] Suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in the anuran ear
    Meenderink, Sebastiaan W. F.
    Narins, Peter M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2007, 121 (01): : 344 - 351
  • [5] Suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and hearing threshold
    Pienkowski, M
    Kunov, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2001, 109 (04): : 1496 - 1502
  • [6] Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in diabetics with normal hearing
    Park, MS
    Park, SW
    Choi, JH
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN AUDIOLOGY, 2001, 30 : 148 - 151
  • [7] Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in the tree frog Hyla cinerea
    van Dijk, P
    Manley, GA
    [J]. HEARING RESEARCH, 2001, 153 (1-2) : 14 - 22
  • [8] Distortion product otoacoustic emissions upon ear canal pressurization
    Zebian, Makram
    Schirkonyer, Volker
    Hensel, Johannes
    Vollbort, Sven
    Fedtke, Thomas
    Janssen, Thomas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2013, 133 (04): : EL331 - EL337
  • [9] Statistical evaluation of hearing screening by distortion product otoacoustic emissions
    Bonfils, P
    Avan, P
    Landais, P
    Erminy, M
    Biacabe, B
    [J]. ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 1997, 106 (12): : 1052 - 1062
  • [10] The effects of aging and hearing loss on distortion product otoacoustic emissions
    Cilento, BW
    Norton, SJ
    Gates, GA
    [J]. OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2003, 129 (04) : 382 - 389