Induction immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients older than 60 years of age -: Safety and efficacy of ATGAM®, OKT3® and Simulect®

被引:10
|
作者
Heifets, M [1 ]
Saeed, MI [1 ]
Parikh, MH [1 ]
Sierka, D [1 ]
Kumar, MSA [1 ]
机构
[1] Drexel Univ, Coll Med, Div Transplantat, Hahnemann Univ Hosp, Philadelphia, PA 19102 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2165/00002512-200421110-00005
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Background: The choice of induction immunosuppression for kidney transplantation in elderly recipients is dictated by the consideration of the risk of infection as well as efficacy in the prevention of acute rejection, thus allowing a reduction in subsequent maintenance immunosuppression and its attendant long-term adverse effects. Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of the antibody induction immunosuppression strategies in elderly recipients of kidney transplants. Patients and methods: We present retrospective data analysis on 183 kidney transplant recipients greater than or equal to60 years of age at Hahnemann University Hospital (Philadelphia, PA, USA) over a 12-year period. We compared four consecutive cohorts of kidney transplant recipients receiving lymphocyte immune globulin, equine antithymocyte globulin (ATGAM(R)) [n = 29]; muromonab CD3 (OKT3(R)) [n = 45]; basiliximab (Simulect(R)) with corticosteroid maintenance [n = 40]; and Simulect(R) without corticosteroid maintenance (n = 69). Results: Delayed graft function (DGF) was observed in 48% of patients receiving ATGAM(R) 35.6% in the OKT3(R) group and 35% in the Simulect(R) group with corticosteroid maintenance and 36.2% in the Simulect(R) group without corticosteroid maintenance. The rejection rate within the first 3 months was 31% in the ATGAM(R) and OKT3(R) groups, 17.5% in the Simulect(R) group with corticosteroid maintenance and 14.5% in the Simulect(R) group Without corticosteroid maintenance. These differences for. DGF and acute rejection were statistically significant between patients receiving ATGAM(R) and OKT3(R), ATGAM(R) or OKT3(R) and both groups of Simulect(R) (all p < 0.05). Patients receiving Simulect(R) were free of adverse effects typically encountered by patients receiving polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies for induction. Patients receiving Simulect(R) had much shorter hospital stays and benefited from significant reduction of costs compared with other groups. Conclusion: Our data indicate that kidney transplant recipients greater than or equal to60 years of age benefit from induction therapy with Simulect(R) followed by corticosteroid-free maintenance immunosuppression.
引用
收藏
页码:747 / 756
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Induction Immunosuppression in Kidney Transplant Recipients Older than 60 Years of AgeSafety and Efficacy of ATGAM®, OKT3® and Simulect®
    Michael Heifets
    Muhammad I. Saeed
    Mitten H. Parikh
    Debra Sierka
    Mysore S. A. Kumar
    Drugs & Aging, 2004, 21 : 747 - 756
  • [2] Simulect induction is safer and more effective than OKT3 in kidney recipients older than 60 years.
    Kode, RK
    Kumar, AMS
    Pankewycz, O
    Fyfe, B
    Stabler, S
    Ranganna, K
    Damask, A
    Kumar, MSA
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2000, 69 (08) : S157 - S157
  • [3] Simulect induction significantly decreases CMV infection in kidney recipients compared to OKT3
    Kode, RK
    Kumar, AMS
    Pankewycz, O
    Damask, AM
    Seirka, D
    Lam, A
    Phillips, K
    Ardron, M
    Brezin, J
    Chvala, R
    Kumar, MSA
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2001, 33 (1-2) : 1268 - 1269
  • [4] A prospective randomized trial of OKT3 vs ATGAM induction therapy in pancreas transplant recipients
    Stratta, RJ
    Taylor, RJ
    Weide, LG
    Sindhi, R
    Sudan, D
    Castaldo, P
    Cushing, KA
    Frisbie, K
    Radio, SJ
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1996, 28 (02) : 917 - 918
  • [5] Improved outcome in renal transplant recipients treated with simulect versus OKT3 induction.
    Pelletier, RP
    Davies, EA
    Elkhammas, EA
    Bumgardner, GL
    Henry, ML
    Ferguson, RM
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2000, 69 (08) : S157 - S157
  • [6] INDUCTION IMMUNOSUPPRESSION WITH OKT3 MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODY IN CARDIAC TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS
    PULPON, LA
    DOMINGUEZ, P
    CHAFER, M
    SEGOVIA, J
    CRESPO, MG
    PRADAS, G
    BURGOS, R
    FIGUERA, D
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1990, 22 (05) : 2319 - 2319
  • [7] OKT3 AS PROPHYLAXIS IMMUNOSUPPRESSION IN PEDIATRIC LIVER-TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS
    SOMMERAUER, JF
    ATKISON, P
    HOWARD, J
    GRANT, D
    WALL, W
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1994, 26 (01) : 154 - 156
  • [8] OKT3 INDUCTION IN PEDIATRIC RENAL-TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS
    BARTOSH, SM
    THISTLETHWAITE, RJ
    ARONSON, AJ
    CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1992, 40 (02): : A388 - A388
  • [10] The impact of quadruple immunosuppression with OKT3 on kidney transplantation in black recipients
    Benedetti, E
    Freels, SA
    Coady, NT
    Vasquez, EM
    Pollak, R
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1996, 172 (01): : 56 - 60