Uncertainty quantification in the calibration of a dynamic viscoplastic model of slow slope movements

被引:24
|
作者
Ranalli, Marco [1 ]
Gottardi, Guido [1 ]
Medina-Cetina, Zenon [2 ]
Nadim, Farrokh [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, DISTART, I-40136 Bologna, Italy
[2] Texas A&M Univ, Zachry Dept Civil Engn, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[3] Int Ctr Geohazards, N-0806 Oslo, Norway
关键词
Slow slope movement; Viscous behavior; Dynamic model; Uncertainty analysis; Hazard assessment; CORTINA-DAMPEZZO; LANDSLIDE RISK; DISPLACEMENTS; MUDSLIDE; MOBILITY;
D O I
10.1007/s10346-009-0185-0
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Most landslides occurring in Italy consist of shallow-translational movements, which involve fine, essentially clayey material. They are usually characterized by low velocities, typically of few centimeters per year. The main triggering factor is hydrologic, since movements are usually strictly connected to groundwater level fluctuations. This slow and periodical trend can be interpreted by a viscous soil response, and in order to catch the actual kinematics of the soil mass behavior, a dynamic analysis should be adopted. This paper discusses the case of the Alvera mudslide, located in the Northern Alps (Italy), for which a very detailed and almost 9-year-long monitoring database, including displacements and groundwater levels records, is available. A well-defined dynamic viscoplastic model, capable of returning a displacement prediction and a mobilized shear strength angle estimate from a groundwater level input, was considered. A first deterministic calibration proved the ability of the model to reproduce the mudslide overall displacements trend if a suitable reduction of the mobilized angle phi'(o) is allowed. Then, an uncertainty quantification analysis was performed by measuring the model parameters variability, and all parameters could be represented using a probability density function and a correlation structure. As a consequence, it was possible to define a degree of uncertainty for model predictions, so that an assessment of the model reliability was obtained. The final outcome is believed to represent an important advancement in relation to hazard assessment and for future landslide risk management.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 41
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Uncertainty quantification in the calibration of a dynamic viscoplastic model of slow slope movements
    Marco Ranalli
    Guido Gottardi
    Zenon Medina-Cetina
    Farrokh Nadim
    [J]. Landslides, 2010, 7 : 31 - 41
  • [2] Quantification of Model Uncertainty: Calibration, Model Discrepancy, and Identifiability
    Arendt, Paul D.
    Apley, Daniel W.
    Chen, Wei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 2012, 134 (10)
  • [3] Uncertainty quantification for constitutive model calibration of brain tissue
    Brewick, Patrick T.
    Teferra, Kirubel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS, 2018, 85 : 237 - 255
  • [4] A sequential calibration and validation framework for model uncertainty quantification and reduction
    Jiang, Chen
    Hu, Zhen
    Liu, Yixuan
    Mourelatos, Zissimos P.
    Gorsich, David
    Jayakumar, Paramsothy
    [J]. COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2020, 368
  • [5] SIMULATION MODEL UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION AND MODEL CALIBRATION FOR NATURAL GAS COMPRESSOR UNITS
    Wei, Tingting
    Zhou, Dengji
    Yao, Qinbo
    Zhang, Huisheng
    Lu, Zhenhua
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL ENGINEERING CONGRESS AND EXPOSITION, 2019, VOL 6, 2019,
  • [6] Integration of model verification, validation, and calibration for uncertainty quantification in engineering systems
    Sankararaman, Shankar
    Mahadevanb, Sankaran
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2015, 138 : 194 - 209
  • [7] Uncertainty Quantification Metrics with Varying Statistical Information in Model Calibration and Validation
    Bi, Sifeng
    Prabhu, Saurabh
    Cogan, Scott
    Atamturktur, Sez
    [J]. AIAA JOURNAL, 2017, 55 (10) : 3570 - 3583
  • [8] Uncertainty quantification metrics with varying statistical information in model calibration and validation
    [J]. 1600, AIAA International, 12700 Sunrise Valley Drive, Suite 200Reston, VA, Virginia, Virginia 20191-5807, United States (55):
  • [9] Bayesian model calibration and uncertainty quantification for an HIV model using adaptive Metropolis algorithms
    Wentworth, Mami T.
    Smith, Ralph C.
    Williams, Brian
    [J]. INVERSE PROBLEMS IN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2018, 26 (02) : 233 - 256
  • [10] Sensitivity analysis and calibration of a dynamic physically based slope stability model
    Zieher, Thomas
    Rutzinger, Martin
    Schneider-Muntau, Barbara
    Perzl, Frank
    Leidinger, David
    Formayer, Herbert
    Geitner, Clemens
    [J]. NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2017, 17 (06) : 971 - 992