The Impact of Measurement Error on Wage Decompositions: Evidence From the British Household Panel Survey and the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia Survey

被引:4
|
作者
Uhrig, S. C. Noah [1 ]
Watson, Nicole [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Essex, Inst Social & Econ Res, Colchester, Essex, England
[2] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Inst Appl Econ & Social Res, Level 5,111 Barry St, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会; 英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
British Household Panel Survey (BHPS); Household; Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey; measurement error; quasi-simplex models; gender wage discrimination; decomposition methods; panel data; LIFETIME SUBSTANCE USE; NON-BLACK MALES; OCCUPATIONAL SEGREGATION; COMPENSATING DIFFERENTIALS; FORCE PARTICIPATION; GENDER INEQUALITY; RESPONSE ERRORS; SEX COMPOSITION; CAUTIONARY NOTE; EARNINGS;
D O I
10.1177/0049124117701476
中图分类号
O1 [数学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Test-retest reliability assessments rarely investigate whether reliability itself is stable or change in reliability affects findings from substantive models. Research across the social sciences often recognizes that measurement error could influence results, yet it rarely applies established error correction methods. Focusing on gender wage inequality, we address two questions. First, to what extent does reliability vary over time, across genders and across measurement protocols? Second, does correcting for measurement error influence substantive conclusions about gender wage inequality? Comparing British and Australian panel data, we find little temporal variability in reliability; however, measurement error effects are variable and sometimes substantial.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 78
页数:36
相关论文
共 50 条