Winners and losers in Russian agrarian reform

被引:0
|
作者
Wegren, SK [1 ]
O'Brien, DJ
Patsiorkovski, VV
机构
[1] So Methodist Univ, Dallas, TX 75275 USA
[2] Univ Missouri, Columbia, MO USA
[3] Inst Socioecon Problems Populat, Moscow, Russia
来源
JOURNAL OF PEASANT STUDIES | 2002年 / 30卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
030303 ;
摘要
More than ten years after Russian agrarian reform was begun, it is appropriate to reflect upon winners and losers. Using survey data from 800 households in five Russian regions, this article is interested in the effect of reform within the rural sphere. The analysis focuses on four groups of rural actors within the food production sphere: private farmers, farm managers, specialists employed on state and collective farms and their juridical successors, and farm workers employed on state and collective farms and their juridical successors The first part of the article examines winners and losers using the following variables: self-perceptions about winners and losers, monthly household income, job security, and ownership of certain durable goods. We conclude that private farmers have fared best relative to other occupational groups. On large farms, managers have fared best. The second part of the article analyses why winners win by considering structural and behavioural factors. We conclude that winners win because they take advantage of reform opportunities and engage in market-based activities.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 29
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Health Reform's Winners and Losers
    Wingfield, Brian
    Whelan, David
    Herper, Matthew
    [J]. FORBES, 2010, 185 (06): : 10 - 10
  • [2] Discourse of winners and losers in Russian transformations
    Danilova, E. N.
    [J]. SOTSIOLOGICHESKIE ISSLEDOVANIYA, 2014, (05): : 16 - 26
  • [3] Winners and losers from agrarian reform: Evidence from Danish land inequality 1682-1895
    Boberg-Fazlic, Nina
    Lampe, Markus
    Martinelli Lasheras, Pablo
    Sharp, Paul
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2022, 155
  • [4] The Russian Agrarian Reform
    Stone, N. I.
    [J]. POLITICAL SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1916, 31 (04) : 635 - 637
  • [5] Winners, Losers, and Voter Confidence in Response to Partisan Electoral Reform
    Hood, M., V
    McKee, Seth C.
    [J]. POLITICAL SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2024,
  • [6] The winners and losers of tax reform: An assessment under financial integration
    Kabukcuoglu, Ayse
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS & CONTROL, 2017, 85 : 90 - 122
  • [7] Winners and Losers An assessment of the Hungarian flat tax reform with microsimulation
    Csaba, Toth G.
    Virovicz, Peter
    [J]. PUBLIC FINANCE QUARTERLY-HUNGARY, 2013, 58 (04): : 369 - 385
  • [8] Winners and losers
    Redfearn, J
    [J]. PHYSICS WORLD, 1996, 9 (11) : 7 - 7
  • [9] Winners and Losers
    Mancini, Giancarlo
    [J]. CINEFORUM, 2014, 54 (02): : 13 - 14
  • [10] Winners and losers
    Cremonini, Giorgio
    [J]. CINEFORUM, 2006, 46 (05): : 90 - 90