The SPOTIS Rank Reversal Free Method for Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Support

被引:0
|
作者
Dezert, Jean [1 ]
Tchamova, Albena [2 ]
Han, Deqiang [3 ]
Tacnet, Jean-Marc [4 ]
机构
[1] French Aerosp Lab, Palaiseau, France
[2] BAS, Inst I&C Tech, Sofia, Bulgaria
[3] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Inst Integrated Automat, Xian, Peoples R China
[4] INRAE, UR ETNA, F-38000 Grenoble, France
关键词
SPOTIS; multi-criteria decision-making; Information fusion; TOPSIS; MCDM;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
In this paper, we propose a new Multi-Criteria Decision-Making method (MCDM) which is rank reversal free. We call it the SPOTIS method standing for Stable Preference Ordering Towards Ideal Solution method. Our method is exempt of rank reversal because the preference ordering established from the score matrix of the MCDM problem under consideration does not require the relative comparisons between alternatives, but only comparisons with respect to the ideal solution chosen by the MCDM system designer after transforming the incomplete original MCDM problem into a well-defined one thanks to the specification of the min and max bounds of each criterion involved in the problem.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 202
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Extension of the SPOTIS method for the rank reversal free decision-making under fuzzy environment
    Shekhovtsov, Andrii
    Paradowski, Bartosz
    Wieckowski, Jakub
    Kizielewicz, Bartlomiej
    Salabun, Wojciech
    [J]. 2022 IEEE 61ST CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL (CDC), 2022, : 5595 - 5600
  • [2] The stratified multi-criteria decision-making method
    Asadabadi, Mehdi Rajabi
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2018, 162 : 115 - 123
  • [3] Multi-Criteria Decision-Making
    Encheva, Sylvia
    [J]. MICBE '09: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH WSEAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTERS IN BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS, 2009, : 192 - +
  • [4] When is a Decision-Making Method Trustworthy? Criteria for Evaluating Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods
    Saaty, Thomas L.
    Ergu, Daji
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2015, 14 (06) : 1171 - 1187
  • [5] Fuzzy α-discounting method for multi-criteria decision-making
    Karaman, Atilla
    Dagdeviren, Metin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE CHINESE INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERS, 2015, 38 (07) : 855 - 865
  • [6] Multiplicative multi-criteria analysis method for decision-making
    Zizovic, Miodrag M.
    Damljanovic, Nada
    Zizovic, Malisa R.
    [J]. MAEJO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 10 (02) : 233 - 241
  • [7] Structure of multi-criteria decision-making
    Brugha, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2004, 55 (11) : 1156 - 1168
  • [8] SUBJECTIVE MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING
    ESHRAGH, F
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MAN-MACHINE STUDIES, 1980, 13 (01): : 117 - 141
  • [9] Multi-criteria Preference Vector Method as Support Tool for Decision-Making in Virtual Worlds
    Nermend, Kesra
    [J]. SELECTED ISSUES IN EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2016, : 181 - 202
  • [10] DECISION-MAKING SUPPORT FOR HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT ON THE BASIS OF MULTI-CRITERIA OPTIMIZATION METHOD
    Mammadova, M. G.
    Jabrayilova, Z. G.
    [J]. 2015 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLICATION OF INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES (AICT), 2015, : 579 - 582