Do renewable portfolio standards increase renewable energy capacity? Evidence from the United States

被引:37
|
作者
Joshi, Janak [1 ]
机构
[1] Hood Coll, George B Delaplaine Jr Sch Business, Frederick, MD 21701 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Energy Policy; Renewable portfolio standard; Spatial structure; Electricity market; United States;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112261
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This research evaluates the impacts of the Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) on renewable electricity capacity using annual data spanning 47 states between 1990 and 2014 in the United States. RPS is a state-level policy that requires electricity suppliers to include a certain fraction of renewable electricity in their total electricity sales over a specified time period. Following nuanced identification strategies, generalized difference-in-difference method is used to transform observational data into a quasiexperimental setting to mitigate against potentially inconsistent estimator or selection bias concerns vis-`a-vis the adoption of RPS across states. Generalized least squares with panel corrected standard errors and spatial econometric methods are selected as estimation techniques. The results show that RPS adoption drives more than one third increase in overall renewable electricity capacity. RPS impacts on total electricity capacity remain significantly positive with consistent estimates across modeling scenarios. However, the results reveal that impacts of heterogeneous RPS attributes differ across competing sources of renewable electricity. The impacts are positively significant for solar and wind capacity with the largest impact on wind capacity, while they are insignificant or significantly negative for biomass and geothermal capacity. The significantly positive contribution of renewable energy certificates provision and manifestation of spatial spillover effects indicate the regional marketing possibilities of renewable energy. The results imply that scaling up RPS proliferation across the states and specifying RPS targets by renewable energy sources at least up to the point when renewable energy sector achieves efficiency gains (economies of scales and allocative efficiency) or better alternatives to the RPS become available (e.g., least-cost carbon pricing policy), can play critical roles to exert transformative advances in renewable electricity sector.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Do renewable portfolio standards in the United States stunt renewable electricity development beyond mandatory targets?
    Zhou, Shan
    Solomon, Barry D.
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2020, 140
  • [2] The political economy of renewable portfolio standards in the United States
    Thombs, Ryan P.
    Jorgenson, Andrew K.
    [J]. ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2020, 62
  • [3] Funding renewable energy: An analysis of renewable portfolio standards
    Upton, Gregory B., Jr.
    Snyder, Brian F.
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2017, 66 : 205 - 216
  • [4] Renewable energy potential and adoption of renewable portfolio standards
    Upton, Gregory B., Jr.
    Snyder, Brian F.
    [J]. UTILITIES POLICY, 2015, 36 : 67 - 70
  • [5] Renewable Portfolio Standards: When Do They Lower Energy Prices?
    Fischer, Carolyn
    [J]. ENERGY JOURNAL, 2010, 31 (01): : 101 - 119
  • [6] Do nuclear and renewable energy improve the environment? Empirical evidence from the United States
    Baek, Jungho
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2016, 66 : 352 - 356
  • [7] Why Do States Adopt Renewable Portfolio Standards?: An Empirical Investigation
    Lyon, Thomas P.
    Yin, Haitao
    [J]. ENERGY JOURNAL, 2010, 31 (03): : 133 - 157
  • [8] Do Mandatory US State Renewable Portfolio Standards Increase Electricity Prices?
    Wang, Hongbo
    [J]. GROWTH AND CHANGE, 2016, 47 (02) : 157 - 174
  • [9] The Disparate Influence of State Renewable Portfolio Standards on Renewable Electricity Generation Capacity
    Maguire, Karen
    Munasib, Abdul
    [J]. LAND ECONOMICS, 2016, 92 (03) : 468 - 490
  • [10] Renewable Portfolio Standards
    Feldman, Rachel
    Levinson, Arik
    [J]. ENERGY JOURNAL, 2023, 44 (05): : 1 - 20