Environmental Risk Assessment for PM2.5 Pollution from Non-Point Sources in the Mining Area Based on Multi-Source Superposition and Diffusion

被引:6
|
作者
Zhou, Liying [1 ,2 ]
Li, Zichen [1 ,2 ]
Meng, Linglong [3 ]
Li, Tianxin [1 ,2 ]
Lopes, Namir Domingos Raimundo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sci & Technol Beijing, Energy & Environm Engn Coll, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Key Lab Resource Oriented Treatment Ind P, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[3] Tech Ctr Soil Agr & Rural Ecol & Environm, Minist Ecol & Environm, Beijing 100012, Peoples R China
关键词
PM2; 5; non-point sources in the mining area; multi-source superposition; diffusion; risk assessment; PARTICULATE MATTER; AIR-QUALITY; SIZE DISTRIBUTION; HEALTH-RISK; EMISSIONS; DISPERSION; DUST; PARTICLES; INVENTORY; ELEMENTS;
D O I
10.3390/su13126619
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
To identify high-concentration contributing sources and highly dispersive pollution sources of fine particulate matter, analyze the relationship between the location and distribution shape of emission sources and the concentration contribution and dispersion of particulate matter, and realize the atmospheric environment risk simulation and the differential control of non-point sources in the mining area, taking a large mining area in Inner Mongolia as an example, we classified the emission sources of PM2.5 (particulate matter less than 2.5 mu m) and complied with the emission inventory. A CALPUFF model was used to simulate the contribution for the PM2.5 concentration of six types of emission sources and a multi-source superposition. Through scenario simulation, we analyzed the relationship between the spatial distribution of emission sources and the emission concentration and diffusion in a large mining area. We analyzed the relative risks of six types of sources under the influence of other superimposed sources and the change of emission concentration during transmission. We established a three-dimensional evaluation model to assess the atmospheric environmental risk of PM2.5 non-point sources in the mining area, considering the change rate of PM2.5 concentration with migration, the relative contribution ratio of superimposed sources, and the equal contribution index of the standard concentration. The results show that the maximum equal contribution index of standard concentration of multi-source superposition was 4.40. Among them, non-paved roads, exposed surface sources of coal piles, and exposed surface sources of mine pits and dumps were the top three pollution contributors, and their maximum equal contribution indexes of standard concentration were 2.40, 2.21, and 2.10, respectively. The effect of superimposed pollution sources was affected by the wind field and the spatial distribution density of emission sources, while the dispersion was affected by the wind direction and the distribution direction of pollution sources. In the case of the same source intensity and emission area, the denser the source distribution was, the higher the emission concentration was, the smaller the contribution ratio of superimposed sources was, and the greater the relative pollution risk was. When the angle between the direction of dispersed linear pollution sources and the dominant wind direction was smaller, the emission concentration was higher, but the diffusion surface was smaller. When the angle with the direction of wind direction was larger, the emission concentration was lower, but the diffusion surface was larger. Concentrated pollution sources had the highest concentration and the diffusion surface was in the middle. Non-paved roads had the highest environmental risk, with an average risk of 5.61 x 10(-2), followed by coal piles with an average value of 2.06 x 10(-2), followed by pits and dumps with an average value of 1.89 x 10(-2); the environmental risk of loading and unloading sources was the lowest. Unpaved roads were pollution sources with high relative pollution risk and diffusion risk, and their average relative pollution risk and diffusion risk were 2.34 x 10(-2) and 3.28 x 10(-2), respectively. In the case of multi-source superposition, the high-risk areas were mainly heavily polluted areas with intensive emission sources, while the medium-risk areas were moderately polluted areas with scattered pollution sources, and the diffusion risk was high. This research concludes that the dispersed distribution of pollution sources can reduce pollution risk, and the smaller the angle is between the linear distribution direction of pollution sources and the dominant wind direction, the smaller the diffusion risk is. Therefore, differentiated control can be carried out according to the characteristics of pollution sources. The conclusions can provide methods and theoretical support for the control of atmospheric environment risk, pollution prevention, and control planning in mining areas.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Water Resource Risk Assessment Based on Non-Point Source Pollution
    Yuan, Xiaodie
    Jun, Zhang
    WATER, 2021, 13 (14)
  • [2] NON-POINT SOURCE P POLLUTION RISK ASSESSMENT FOR BASIN AREA BASED ON REMOTE SENSING IMAGE
    Wang Shudong
    Zhang Xia
    Zhu Haitao
    Chen Xiaoping
    Shuai Tong
    Zhuang Zhi
    2013 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM (IGARSS), 2013, : 3706 - 3709
  • [3] Decryption analysis of antimony pollution sources in PM2.5 through a multi-source isotope mixing model based on lead isotopes
    Shen, Yi-Wen
    Zhao, Chang-Xian
    Zhao, Hao
    Dong, Shuo-Fei
    Xie, Jiao-Jiao
    Lv, Mei-Ling
    Yuan, Chun-Gang
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2023, 328
  • [4] Assessment of potential risk groundwater pollution from agricultural non-point sources
    Trevisan, M
    Padovani, L
    Capri, E
    HUMAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE TO XENOBIOTICS, 1999, : 543 - 550
  • [5] Environmental Levels, Sources, and Cancer Risk Assessment of PAHs Associated with PM2.5 and TSP in Monterrey Metropolitan Area
    Francisco E. Longoria-Rodríguez
    Lucy T. González
    Alberto Mendoza
    Cesar Leyva-Porras
    Alejandro Arizpe-Zapata
    Miguel Esneider-Alcalá
    Karim Acuña-Askar
    Octavio Gaspar-Ramirez
    Olivia López-Ayala
    Juan M. Alfaro-Barbosa
    Oxana V. Kharissova
    Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 2020, 78 : 377 - 391
  • [6] Environmental Levels, Sources, and Cancer Risk Assessment of PAHs Associated with PM2.5 and TSP in Monterrey Metropolitan Area
    Longoria-Rodriguez, Francisco E.
    Gonzalez, Lucy T.
    Mendoza, Alberto
    Leyva-Porras, Cesar
    Arizpe-Zapata, Alejandro
    Esneider-Alcala, Miguel
    Acuna-Askar, Karim
    Gaspar-Ramirez, Octavio
    Lopez-Ayala, Olivia
    Alfaro-Barbosa, Juan M.
    Kharissova, Oxana V.
    ARCHIVES OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINATION AND TOXICOLOGY, 2020, 78 (03) : 377 - 391
  • [7] Risk assessment of non-point source pollution in karst reservoirs based on 'source-sink' landscape theory
    Zhao, Weiquan
    Zhou, Zhongfa
    Zhao, Zulun
    Li, Wei
    Li, Qiuhua
    WATER SUPPLY, 2022, 22 (06) : 6094 - 6110
  • [8] Risk assessment of groundwater with multi-source pollution by a long-term monitoring programme for a large mining area
    Zeng, Bin
    Zhang, ZhengXin
    Yang, Muyi
    INTERNATIONAL BIODETERIORATION & BIODEGRADATION, 2018, 128 : 100 - 108
  • [9] Risk assessment of non-point source pollution based on landscape pattern in the Hanjiang River basin, China
    Yi-wen Liu
    Jia-ke Li
    Jun Xia
    Gai-rui Hao
    Fang-Yenn Teo
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021, 28 : 64322 - 64336
  • [10] Risk assessment of non-point source pollution based on landscape pattern in the Hanjiang River basin, China
    Liu, Yi-wen
    Li, Jia-ke
    Xia, Jun
    Hao, Gai-rui
    Teo, Fang-Yenn
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2021, 28 (45) : 64322 - 64336