Understanding recent market trends of the US ESCO industry

被引:13
|
作者
Stuart, Elizabeth [1 ]
Carvallo, Juan Pablo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Larsen, Peter H. [1 ,4 ]
Goldman, Charles A. [1 ]
Gilligan, Donald [5 ]
机构
[1] Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley Natl Lab, 1 Cyclotron Rd,MS 90R4000, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Renewable & Appropriate Energy Lab, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[3] Univ Calif Berkeley, Energy & Resources Grp, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[4] Stanford Univ, Sch Engn, Management Sci & Engn Dept, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[5] Natl Assoc Energy Serv Co, Washington, DC USA
关键词
ESCO; Energy service companies; Energy efficiency; Economic trends; SERVICE COMPANY INDUSTRY; ENERGY; EVOLUTION; BUSINESS; FOSTER; SIZE;
D O I
10.1007/s12053-018-9633-9
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The US energy services company (ESCO) industry is an example of a private-sector business model that delivers energy savings to customers primarily through the use of performance-based contracts. US ESCO projects garner significant incremental annual savings: approximately 1% of total US commercial building consumption in 2014. From 2000 to 2011, the industry experienced year over year growth; however, based on information drawn from interviews with ESCO executives conducted in late 2015, the authors find that from 2012 to 2014, ESCO industry revenues did not increase. While public and institutional market sectors accounted for 85% of industry revenue in 2014, consistent with previous research findings, the share of revenue from performance contracting increased to 74% in 2014, as compared to 69% share reported for 2011 and 2008. The revenue numbers between 2011 and 2014 are not fully comparable, because a few ESCOs that were subsidiaries of larger companies had undergone reorganization and some categories of revenue reported in 2011 were not included for 2014. Other factors that may have contributed to the recent revenue trend include the following: (1) increased competition from companies not historically defined as an ESCO (e.g. mechanical contractors), (2) uncertainty among some potential customers about committing to long-term performance contracts, and (3) reduction of performance contracting's perceived benefit of hedging energy price increases and variability due to customer expectations of continued low and less volatile energy prices.
引用
收藏
页码:1303 / 1324
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Understanding recent market trends of the US ESCO industry
    Elizabeth Stuart
    Juan Pablo Carvallo
    Peter H. Larsen
    Charles A. Goldman
    Donald Gilligan
    [J]. Energy Efficiency, 2018, 11 : 1303 - 1324
  • [2] Review of US ESCO industry market trends: an empirical analysis of project data
    Goldman, CA
    Hopper, NC
    Osborn, JG
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2005, 33 (03) : 387 - 405
  • [3] The evolution of the US energy service company (ESCO) industry: from ESCO to Super ESCO
    Vine, E
    Nakagami, H
    Murakoshi, C
    [J]. ENERGY, 1999, 24 (06) : 479 - 492
  • [4] Evaluating project level investment trends for the US ESCO industry: 1990-2017
    Carvallo, Juan Pablo
    Murphy, Sean P.
    Stuart, Elizabeth
    Larsen, Peter H.
    Goldman, Charles
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2019, 130 : 139 - 161
  • [5] UNDERSTANDING THE RECENT US TOURISM INDUSTRY CYCLE
    Chen, Ming-Hsiang
    [J]. ANNALS OF TOURISM RESEARCH, 2013, 40 : 423 - 427
  • [6] A method to estimate the size and remaining market potential of the US ESCO (energy service company) industry
    Stuart, Elizabeth
    Larsen, Peter H.
    Goldman, Charles A.
    Gilligan, Donald
    [J]. ENERGY, 2014, 77 : 362 - 371
  • [7] Recent US trends
    Bronwyn Wake
    [J]. Nature Climate Change, 2016, 6 (3) : 232 - 232
  • [8] Overview on world trade in organic food products, the US market and recent trends
    Zepeda, Jose Falck
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 88 (05) : 1200 - 1208
  • [9] MARKET TRENDS IN ELECTRONICS INDUSTRY
    FINK, DG
    [J]. IEEE SPECTRUM, 1969, 6 (12) : 57 - &
  • [10] BROILER INDUSTRY TRENDS IN US
    WAGSTAFF, RK
    [J]. FEEDSTUFFS, 1968, 40 (40): : 58 - &