A Systematic Review of Reading Engagement Research: What Do We Mean, What Do We Know, and Where Do We Need to Go?

被引:19
|
作者
Lee, Yongjun [1 ]
Jang, Bong Gee [2 ]
Smith, Kristin Conradi [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Dept Curriculum & Instruct, Minneapolis, MN USA
[2] Syracuse Univ, Dept Reading & Language Arts, 202 Huntington Hall, Syracuse, NY 13244 USA
[3] William & Mary, Dept Curriculum & Instruct, Williamsburg, VA USA
关键词
LITERACY ENGAGEMENT; ENGLISH LEARNERS; CHILDRENS MOTIVATION; STUDENT ENGAGEMENT; SELF-REGULATION; COMPREHENSION; INSTRUCTION; SCHOOL; ACHIEVEMENT; READERS;
D O I
10.1080/02702711.2021.1888359
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
Motivation and engagement play a crucial role in literacy development and achievement. However, the construct of reading engagement has become blurred and ambiguous, both in research and in discussions of practice. In order to guide future research and to extend our existing understanding of reading engagement into classroom practice, this study presents an extensive survey and systematic analysis of prior studies of reading engagement. Selection criteria resulted in the identification of 60 data-based articles published in 12 peer-reviewed journals through 2019. Over the period examined, there was a steady increase in the number of studies reported, especially since 2011. The early adolescent group was studied the most frequently, and the most popular technique involved observations and interviews. In terms of the definition of reading engagement, only 42% of the studies explicitly defined the term. Many studies have focused on the behavioral dimensions and antecedents for reading engagement, while others explored reading engagement as an aptitude. Although this review did not support a single interpretation of reading engagement as either an aptitude or an event, the resulting discussion broadens perspectives for reading engagement research.
引用
收藏
页码:540 / 576
页数:37
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Research on calculus: what do we know and where do we need to go?
    Rasmussen, Chris
    Marrongelle, Karen
    Borba, Marcelo C.
    [J]. ZDM-MATHEMATICS EDUCATION, 2014, 46 (04): : 507 - 515
  • [2] What do we know and where do we go?
    Vandiver, BJ
    [J]. COUNSELING PSYCHOLOGIST, 2002, 30 (01): : 96 - 104
  • [3] Reflections on Broadening Participation in STEM: What Do We Know? What Do We Need to Know? Where Do We Go From Here?
    Leggon, Cheryl B.
    [J]. AMERICAN BEHAVIORAL SCIENTIST, 2018, 62 (05) : 719 - 726
  • [4] What do we know? What do we need to know?
    Milena J. Henzlova
    W. Lane Duvall
    [J]. Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, 2017, 24 : 252 - 254
  • [5] What do we know? What do we need to know?
    Henzlova, Milena J.
    Duvall, W. Lane
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 24 (01) : 252 - 254
  • [6] Ethical Judgments: What Do We Know, Where Do We Go?
    Peter E. Mudrack
    E. Sharon Mason
    [J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2013, 115 : 575 - 597
  • [7] Surrogate alcohol: What do we know and where do we go?
    Lachenmeier, Dirk W.
    Rehm, Juergen
    Gmel, Gerhard
    [J]. ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2007, 31 (10) : 1613 - 1624
  • [8] Implementing Exercise: What Do We Know? Where Do We Go?
    Painter, Patricia
    [J]. ADVANCES IN CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE, 2009, 16 (06) : 536 - 544
  • [9] Ethical Judgments: What Do We Know, Where Do We Go?
    Mudrack, Peter E.
    Mason, E. Sharon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2013, 115 (03) : 575 - 597
  • [10] Cancer and stroke: What do we know and where do we go?
    Lun, Ronda
    Siegal, Deborah
    Ramsay, Tim
    Dowlatshahi, Dar
    [J]. THROMBOSIS RESEARCH, 2022, 219 : 133 - 140