Integrating community-based participatory research and informatics approaches to improve the engagement and health of underserved populations

被引:119
|
作者
Unertl, Kim M. [1 ]
Schaefbauer, Chris L. [2 ]
Campbell, Terrance R. [3 ]
Senteio, Charles [4 ]
Siek, Katie A. [5 ]
Bakken, Suzanne [6 ,7 ]
Veinot, Tiffany C. [4 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Sch Med, Dept Biomed Informat, Nashville, TN 37212 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Dept Comp Sci, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[3] YOUR Ctr, Flint, MI USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Sch Informat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[5] Indiana Univ, Informat Div, Bloomington, IN USA
[6] Columbia Univ, Sch Nursing, New York, NY USA
[7] Columbia Univ, Dept Biomed Informat, New York, NY USA
[8] Univ Michigan, Sch Publ Hlth, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局; 美国国家卫生研究院; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
community-based participatory research; research design; patient empowerment; mHealth; patient-centered care; PATIENT ENGAGEMENT; DIGITAL DIVIDES; TECHNOLOGY USE; PERCEPTIONS; MANAGEMENT; LITERACY; INTERNET; OUTCOMES; EHEALTH; WEBSITE;
D O I
10.1093/jamia/ocv094
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Objective We compare 5 health informatics research projects that applied community-based participatory research (CBPR) approaches with the goal of extending existing CBPR principles to address issues specific to health informatics research. Materials and methods We conducted a cross-case analysis of 5 diverse case studies with 1 common element: integration of CBPR approaches into health informatics research. After reviewing publications and other case-related materials, all coauthors engaged in collaborative discussions focused on CBPR. Researchers mapped each case to an existing CBPR framework, examined each case individually for success factors and barriers, and identified common patterns across cases. Results Benefits of applying CBPR approaches to health informatics research across the cases included the following: developing more relevant research with wider impact, greater engagement with diverse populations, improved internal validity, more rapid translation of research into action, and the development of people. Challenges of applying CBPR to health informatics research included requirements to develop strong, sustainable academic-community partnerships and mismatches related to cultural and temporal factors. Several technology-related challenges, including needs to define ownership of technology outputs and to build technical capacity with community partners, also emerged from our analysis. Finally, we created several principles that extended an existing CBPR framework to specifically address health informatics research requirements. Conclusions Our cross-case analysis yielded valuable insights regarding CBPR implementation in health informatics research and identified valuable lessons useful for future CBPR-based research. The benefits of applying CBPR approaches can be significant, particularly in engaging populations that are typically underserved by health care and in designing patient-facing technology.
引用
收藏
页码:60 / 73
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条