共 50 条
Alternative clinical trial designs
被引:4
|作者:
Harvin, John A.
[1
]
Zarzaur, Ben L.
[2
]
Nirula, Raminder
[3
]
King, Benjamin T.
[4
]
Malhotra, Ajai K.
[5
]
机构:
[1] Univ Texas Houston, McGovern Med Sch, Surg, Houston, TX USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Surg, Madison, WI USA
[3] Univ Utah, Sch Med, Surg, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[4] Univ Texas Austin, Dell Med Sch, Neurol, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[5] Univ Vermont, Med Ctr, Surg, Burlington, VT 05401 USA
关键词:
SPLENIC INJURY;
TRAUMA;
PLASMA;
EMBOLIZATION;
MULTICENTER;
MANAGEMENT;
RATIONALE;
MORTALITY;
D O I:
10.1136/tsaco-2019-000420
中图分类号:
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100602 ;
摘要:
High-quality clinical trials are needed to advance the care of injured patients. Traditional randomized clinical trials in trauma have challenges in generating new knowledge due to many issues, including logistical difficulties performing individual randomization, unclear pretrial estimates of treatment effect leading to often unpowered studies, and difficulty assessing the generalizability of an intervention given the heterogeneity of both patients and trauma centers. In this review, we discuss alternative clinical trial designs that can address some of these difficulties. These include pragmatic trials, cluster randomization, cluster randomized stepped wedge designs, factorial trials, and adaptive designs. Additionally, we discuss how Bayesian methods of inference may provide more knowledge to trauma and acute care surgeons compared with traditional, frequentist methods.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文