A BELGIAN SURVEY ON GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT IN ONCOLOGY FOCUSING ON LARGE-SCALE IMPLEMENTATION AND RELATED BARRIERS AND FACILITATORS

被引:0
|
作者
Kenis, C. [1 ,2 ]
Heeren, P. [2 ]
Decoster, L. [3 ]
Van Puyvelde, K. [4 ]
Conings, G. [3 ]
Cornelis, F. [5 ]
Cornette, P. [6 ]
Moor, R. [5 ]
Luce, S. [7 ]
Libert, Y. [8 ]
Van Rijswijk, R. [9 ]
Jerusalem, G. [10 ]
Rasschaert, M. [11 ]
Langenaeken, C. [12 ]
Baitar, A. [13 ]
Specenier, P. [14 ]
Geboers, K. [15 ]
Vandenborre, K. [16 ,19 ]
Debruyne, P. R. [17 ,18 ]
Vanoverbeke, K.
Van den Bulck, H. [20 ]
Praet, J. -P. [21 ]
Focan, C. [22 ]
Verschaeve, V. [23 ]
Nols, N. [24 ]
Goeminne, J. -C. [25 ]
Petit, B. [26 ]
Lobelle, J. -P.
Flamaing, J. [27 ,28 ]
Milisen, K. [2 ,27 ]
Wildiers, H. [1 ,29 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Gen Med Oncol, Leuven, Belgium
[2] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Hlth Serv & Nursing Res, Leuven, Belgium
[3] Vrije Univ Brussel, Univ Ziekenhuis Brussel, Dept Med Oncol, Oncol Ctr, Brussels, Belgium
[4] Vrije Univ Brussel, Frailty Ageing FRIA Res Grp, Brussels, Belgium
[5] UCL, Clin Univ St Luc, Dept Med Oncol, Brussels, Belgium
[6] UCL, Clin Univ St Luc, Dept Geriatr Med, Brussels, Belgium
[7] Univ Libre Bruxelles, Dept Med Oncol, Erasme Univ Hosp, Brussels, Belgium
[8] ULB, Inst Jules Bordet, Clin Psychooncol, Brussels, Belgium
[9] ZNA Stuivenberg, Dept Med Oncol, Antwerp, Belgium
[10] Ctr Hosp Univ Sart Tilman, Dept Med Oncol, Liege, Belgium
[11] Iridium Canc Network Antwerp, Dept Med Oncol, Antwerp, Belgium
[12] Iridium Canc Network Antwerp, Dept Med Oncol, AZ Klina, Brasschaat, Belgium
[13] ZNA Middelheim, Dept Med Oncol, Antwerp, Belgium
[14] Univ Antwerp Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Antwerp, Belgium
[15] AZ Turnhout, Ctr Oncol & Hematol, Turnhout, Belgium
[16] AZ Vesalius, Dept Med Oncol, Tongeren, Belgium
[17] Gen Hosp Groeninge, Ctr Canc, Kortrijk, Belgium
[18] Univ Greenwich, Ageing & Canc Res Cluster, Ctr Posit Ageing, London SE18 6PF, England
[19] AZ Sint Lucas, Dept Geriatr Med, Ghent, Belgium
[20] Imelda Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Bonheiden, Belgium
[21] Free Univ Brussels, Dept Geriatr Med, CHU St Pierre, Brussels, Belgium
[22] CHC Liege Hosp Grp, Dept Oncol, Clin St Joseph, B-4000 Liege, Belgium
[23] GHDC Grand Hop Charleroi, Dept Med Oncol, Charleroi, Belgium
[24] Ctr Hosp Mouscron, Dept Med Oncol, Mouscron, Belgium
[25] Clin & Matern St Elisabeth, Dept Med Oncol, Namur, Belgium
[26] Ctr Hosp Jolimont, Dept Med Oncol, La Louviere, Belgium
[27] Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Geriatr Med, Leuven, Belgium
[28] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Clin & Expt Med, Leuven, Belgium
[29] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Oncol, Leuven, Belgium
来源
JOURNAL OF NUTRITION HEALTH & AGING | 2016年 / 20卷 / 01期
关键词
Cancer; geriatric assessment; older person; barriers; facilitators; survey; OLDER CANCER-PATIENTS; SCREENING TOOLS; CONSULTATION; UPDATE;
D O I
10.1007/s12603-016-0677-2
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Objectives: The aim of this study is to describe a large-scale, Belgian implementation project about geriatric assessment (=GA) in daily oncology practice and to identify barriers and facilitators for implementing GA in this setting. Design / setting / participants: The principal investigator of every participating hospital (n=22) was invited to complete a newly developed questionnaire with closed-and open-ended questions. The closed-ended questions surveyed how GA was implemented. The open-ended questions identified barriers and facilitators for the implementation of GA in daily oncology practice. Descriptive statistics and conventional content analysis were performed as appropriate. Results: Qualifying criteria (e.g. disease status and cancer type) for GA varied substantially between hospitals. Thirteen hospitals (59.1%) succeeded to screen more than half of eligible patients. Most hospitals reported that GA data and follow-up data had been collected in almost all screened patients. Implementing geriatric recommendations and formulating new geriatric recommendations at the time of follow-up are important opportunities for improvement. The majority of identified barriers were organizational, with high workload, lack of time or financial/staffing problems as most cited. The most cited facilitators were all related to collaboration. Conclusion: Interventions to improve the implementation of GA in older patients with cancer need to address a wide range of factors, with organization and collaboration as key elements. All stakeholders, seeking to improve the implementation of GA in older patients with cancer, should consider and address the identified barriers and facilitators.
引用
收藏
页码:60 / 70
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Belgian survey on geriatric assessment in oncology focusing on large-scale implementation and related barriers and facilitators
    C. Kenis
    P. Heeren
    L. Decoster
    K. Van Puyvelde
    G. Conings
    F. Cornelis
    P. Cornette
    R. Moor
    S. Luce
    Y. Libert
    R. Van Rijswijk
    G. Jerusalem
    M. Rasschaert
    C. Langenaeken
    A. Baitar
    P. Specenier
    K. Geboers
    K. Vandenborre
    P.R. Debruyne
    K. Vanoverbeke
    H. Van Den Bulck
    J.-P. Praet
    C. Focan
    V. Verschaeve
    N. Nols
    J.-C. Goeminne
    B. Petit
    J.-P. Lobelle
    J. Flamaing
    K. Milisen
    Hans Wildiers
    [J]. The journal of nutrition, health & aging, 2016, 20 : 60 - 70
  • [2] Barriers and Facilitators to the Implementation of Large-Scale Nutrition Interventions in Africa: A Scoping Review
    Obidimma Ezezika
    Jenny Gong
    Hajara Abdirahman
    Daniel Sellen
    [J]. Global Implementation Research and Applications, 2021, 1 (1): : 38 - 52
  • [3] Barriers and facilitators of geriatric assessment implementation in daily oncology practice: A qualitative study applying a theoretical implementation framework.
    Matsuoka, Ayumu
    Mizutani, Tomonori
    Kaji, Yuki
    Yaguchi-Saito, Akiko
    Odawara, Miyuki
    Otsuki, Aki
    Saito, Junko
    Fujimori, Maiko
    Uchitomi, Yosuke
    Shimazu, Taichi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 39 (15)
  • [4] Barriers and facilitators to implementing geriatric assessment in daily oncology practice in Japan: A qualitative study using an implementation framework
    Matsuoka, Ayumu
    Mizutani, Tomonori
    Kaji, Yuki
    Yaguchi-Saito, Akiko
    Odawara, Miyuki
    Saito, Junko
    Fujimori, Maiko
    Uchitomi, Yosuke
    Shimazu, Taichi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC ONCOLOGY, 2023, 14 (08)
  • [5] Barriers and Facilitators for the Implementation of Geriatric Oncology Principles in Mexico: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Verduzco-Aguirre, Haydee C.
    Bolano Guerra, Laura M.
    Culakova, Eva
    Monroy Chargoy, Javier
    Martinez-Said, Hector
    Quintero Beulo, Gregorio
    Mohile, Supriya G.
    Soto-Perez-De-Celis, Enrique
    [J]. JCO GLOBAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 8
  • [6] Barriers and facilitators to large-scale image-based research in mammography
    Whelehan, Patsy
    Ali, Kulsam
    Halling-Brown, Mark
    Ramirez, Maria
    Evans, Andy
    Vinnicombe, Sarah
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 19
  • [7] Evaluating a large-scale implementation of Assessment for Learning in Sweden
    Jonsson, Anders
    Lundahl, Christian
    Holmgren, Anders
    [J]. ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION-PRINCIPLES POLICY & PRACTICE, 2015, 22 (01) : 104 - 121
  • [8] Teachers' approaches to classroom assessment: a large-scale survey
    DeLuca, Christopher
    Valiquette, Adelina
    Coombs, Andrew
    LaPointe-McEwan, Danielle
    Luhanga, Ulemu
    [J]. ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION-PRINCIPLES POLICY & PRACTICE, 2018, 25 (04) : 355 - 375
  • [9] Multicenter implementation of geriatric assessment in Belgian patients with cancer: A survey on treating physicians' general experiences and expectations
    Kenis, Cindy
    Heeren, Pieter
    Bron, Dominique
    Decoster, Lore
    Moor, Ramona
    Pepersack, Thierry
    Langenaeken, Christine
    Rasschaert, Marika
    Jerusalem, Guy
    Van Rijswijk, Ruud
    Lobelle, Jean-Pierre
    Flamaing, Johan
    Milisen, Koen
    Wildiers, Hans
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC ONCOLOGY, 2014, 5 (04) : 431 - 438
  • [10] Digital health tools for pain monitoring in pediatric oncology: a scoping review and qualitative assessment of barriers and facilitators of implementation
    J. D. H. P. Simon
    I. S. Hooijman
    M. Van Gorp
    S. A. Schepers
    E. M. C. Michiels
    W. J. E. Tissing
    M. A. Grootenhuis
    [J]. Supportive Care in Cancer, 2023, 31