Unstented tubularized incised plate urethroplasty combined with foreskin reconstruction for distal hypospadias

被引:49
|
作者
Leclair, MD [1 ]
Camby, C [1 ]
Battisti, S [1 ]
Renaud, G [1 ]
Plattner, V [1 ]
Heloury, Y [1 ]
机构
[1] CHU Nantes, Serv Chirurg Infantile, Dept Paediat Urol, Hop Mere Enfant, F-44093 Nantes 01, France
关键词
urethral stent; hypospadias; foreskin reconstruction; tubularized incised plate;
D O I
10.1016/j.eururo.2004.04.021
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and aim: Urethral stent has recently been proven to be unnecessary for normal healing in an animal model of tubularized incised plate (TIP) urethroplasty. We report our experience with unstented TIP repair combined with foreskin reconstruction for distal hypospadias in children. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 162 children consecutively treated by TIP urethroplasty for a distal or mid-shaft hypospadias without urethral stent over a 6 years period. The mean age +/- SEM at surgery was 15.7 +/- 1.2 months. A foreskin reconstruction was performed with the hypospadias repair in 136 boys (84%). One hundred thirty one children (81%) underwent this surgery as an outpatient procedure. Results: With a mean follow-up of 12.4 +/- 1.0 months, urethrocutaneous fistula was observed in 9 children (5.6%), and meatal stenosis in 4 (2.5%). Postoperative urinary retention requiring suprapubic catheter insertion was observed in 4 cases (2.5%) without later complications. Cutaneous dehiscence of the reconstructed foreskin occurred in 6 children (4.4%) and phimosis in 13 (9.5%). Conclusions: Absence of urethral stent after TIP urethroplasty for distal hypospadias repair does not seem to increase postoperative complication rate. Foreskin reconstruction in distal hypospadias surgery has an acceptable complication rate. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:526 / 530
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] TUBULARIZED, INCISED PLATE URETHROPLASTY FOR DISTAL HYPOSPADIAS
    SNODGRASS, W
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1994, 151 (02): : 464 - 465
  • [2] Foreskin reconstruction and preservation of a thin distal urethra: a challenge in tubularized incised plate urethroplasty
    Gunter Fasching
    Christoph Arneitz
    Gabriele Gritsch-Olipp
    [J]. Pediatric Surgery International, 2011, 27 : 755 - 760
  • [3] Foreskin reconstruction and preservation of a thin distal urethra: a challenge in tubularized incised plate urethroplasty
    Fasching, Gunter
    Arneitz, Christoph
    Gritsch-Olipp, Gabriele
    [J]. PEDIATRIC SURGERY INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 27 (07) : 755 - 760
  • [4] THE RESULTS OF TUBULARIZED INCISED PLATE URETHROPLASTY IN ADULTS WITH DISTAL HYPOSPADIAS
    Adayener, C.
    Ates, F.
    Soydan, H.
    Senkul, T.
    Karademir, K.
    Baykal, K.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2010, 9 (06) : 571 - 572
  • [5] Tubularized incised-plate urethroplasty for distal and proximal hypospadias
    Samuel, M
    Wilcox, DT
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 92 (07) : 783 - 785
  • [6] Tubularized incised plate urethroplasty for distal hypospadias: A literature review
    Braga, Luis Henrique P.
    Lorenzo, Armando J.
    Salle, Joao L. Pippi
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 24 (02) : 219 - 225
  • [7] Foreskin reconstruction during tubularized incised plate hypospadias repair
    Snodgrass, WT
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 173 (04): : 203 - 203
  • [8] A prospective study comparing modified foreskin reconstruction versus circumcision with tubularized incised plate urethroplasty for distal and mid penile hypospadias
    Pan, Pradyumna
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY, 2020, 16 (05) : 674.e1 - 674.e7
  • [9] Tubularized incised plate urethroplasty for distal and mid-penile hypospadias
    Dayanç, M
    Tan, MÖ
    Gökalp, A
    Yildirim, I
    Peker, AF
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2000, 37 (01) : 102 - 105
  • [10] Tubularized incised plate urethroplasty for proximal hypospadias
    Mizuno, K
    Hayashi, Y
    Kojima, Y
    Tozawa, K
    Sasaki, S
    Kohri, K
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 9 (02) : 88 - 90