Expensive Inequality Constraints Handling Methods Suitable for Dynamic Surrogate-based Optimization

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Chunna [1 ]
Fang, Hai [1 ]
Gong, Chunlin [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Polytech Univ, Shaanxi Aerosp Flight Vehicle Design Key Lab, Sch Astronaut, Xian 710072, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
inequality constraints; dynamic surrogate-based optimization; Kriging; refinement; penalty factor; EFFICIENT GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION; SAMPLING CRITERIA; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1109/cec.2019.8790253
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
In modern engineering design optimization problems, high-fidelity analyses are always used for evaluating objectives and constraints, which might be quite expensive. Thus, efficient global optimization method should be developed to relieve the computational burden. This paper proposed a dynamic surrogate-based optimization (DSBO) using Kriging model, of which two criteria for selecting infill samples in refinement procedure are employed: maximizing expected improvement (EI) function and minimizing surrogate prediction. The DSBO are validated to be robust and efficient by six standard analytical tests. The inequality constraints are handled by three different means here: constraining El function, penalizing surrogate prediction, and penalizing objective function. Analytical tests and an engineering optimization problem with inequality constraints are carried out. The results indicate that simultaneous constraining El function and penalizing surrogate prediction is most efficient for DSBO, and there is no need of adjusting penalty factor.
引用
收藏
页码:2010 / 2017
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Expensive constraints parallel surrogate-based optimization algorithm based on mean improvement control strategy
    Lin, Cheng-Long
    Ma, Yi-Zhong
    Xiao, Tian-Li
    [J]. Kongzhi Lilun Yu Yingyong/Control Theory and Applications, 2021, 38 (06): : 707 - 718
  • [2] An Ensemble Surrogate-Based Framework for Expensive Multiobjective Evolutionary Optimization
    Lin, Qiuzhen
    Wu, Xunfeng
    Ma, Lijia
    Li, Jianqiang
    Gong, Maoguo
    Coello, Carlos A. Coello
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2022, 26 (04) : 631 - 645
  • [3] Dynamic substructuring and reanalysis methods in a surrogate-based design optimization environment
    D. Akçay Perdahcıoğlu
    H. J. M. Geijselaers
    M. H. M. Ellenbroek
    A. de Boer
    [J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2012, 45 : 129 - 138
  • [4] Dynamic substructuring and reanalysis methods in a surrogate-based design optimization environment
    Perdahcioglu, D. Akcay
    Geijselaers, H. J. M.
    Ellenbroek, M. H. M.
    de Boer, A.
    [J]. STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2012, 45 (01) : 129 - 138
  • [5] A surrogate-based framework for feasibility-driven optimization of expensive simulations
    Tian, Huayu
    Ierapetritou, Marianthi G.
    [J]. AICHE JOURNAL, 2024, 70 (05)
  • [6] Surrogate-Based Optimization of Expensive Flowsheet Modeling for Continuous Pharmaceutical Manufacturing
    Fani Boukouvala
    Marianthi G. Ierapetritou
    [J]. Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation, 2013, 8 : 131 - 145
  • [7] Surrogate-Based Optimization of Expensive Flowsheet Modeling for Continuous Pharmaceutical Manufacturing
    Boukouvala, Fani
    Ierapetritou, Marianthi G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL INNOVATION, 2013, 8 (02) : 131 - 145
  • [8] Comparison of Surrogate-Based Uncertainty Quantification Methods for Computationally Expensive Simulators
    Owen, N. E.
    Challenor, P.
    Menon, P. P.
    Bennani, S.
    [J]. SIAM-ASA JOURNAL ON UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION, 2017, 5 (01): : 403 - 435
  • [9] Infill sampling criteria for surrogate-based optimization with constraint handling
    Parr, J. M.
    Keane, A. J.
    Forrester, A. I. J.
    Holden, C. M. E.
    [J]. ENGINEERING OPTIMIZATION, 2012, 44 (10) : 1147 - 1166
  • [10] Surrogate-based optimization with clustering-based space exploration for expensive multimodal problems
    Huachao Dong
    Baowei Song
    Peng Wang
    Zuomin Dong
    [J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2018, 57 : 1553 - 1577