Benefits and costs of a higher bank "leverage ratio"

被引:25
|
作者
Barth, James R. [1 ]
Miller, Stephen Matteo [2 ]
机构
[1] Auburn Univ, 303 Lowder Business Bldg, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
[2] George Mason Univ, Mercatus Ctr, 3434 Washington Blvd,4th Floor, Arlington, VA 22201 USA
关键词
Bank regulation; Benefit-cost analysis; Capital adequacy standards; US banking crises; CAPITAL STRUCTURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jfs.2018.07.001
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This study reports estimates of the marginal benefits and costs of increasing the regulatory minimum bank equity-to-asset "leverage ratio" from 4 to 15 percent. Benefits arise from reducing the probability of a banking crisis. Costs arise from reduced lending, should banks pass off higher equity costs onto borrowers. Net benefits increase with a higher discount rate, a smaller tax advantage of debt, a lower non-financial corporate debt-to-capital ratio, a higher cost of crises, a longer duration of crises or if crises have some permanent effects. Baseline estimates indicate that the benefits equal costs at 19 percent. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 52
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条