Auditory Arguments: The Logic of 'Sound' Arguments

被引:9
|
作者
Groarke, Leo [1 ]
机构
[1] Trent Univ, Dept Philosophy, Peterborough, ON, Canada
来源
INFORMAL LOGIC | 2018年 / 38卷 / 03期
关键词
auditory argument; informal logic; prosody; multimodal argument; visual argument;
D O I
10.22329/il.v38i3.4954
中图分类号
B81 [逻辑学(论理学)];
学科分类号
010104 ; 010105 ;
摘要
This article discusses "auditory" arguments: arguments in which non-verbal sounds play a central role. It provides examples and explores the use of sounds in argument and argumentation. It argues that auditory arguments are not reducible to verbal arguments but have a similar structure and can be evaluated by extending standard informal logic accounts of good argument. I conclude that an understanding of auditory elements of argument can usefully expand the scope of informal logic and argumentation theory.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:312 / 340
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Can we Translate Sounds into Words? A response to Leo Groarke's Auditory Arguments: The Logic of 'Sound' Arguments
    Kisicek, Gabrijela
    INFORMAL LOGIC, 2018, 38 (03): : 346 - 361
  • [2] SOUND ARGUMENTS
    Cox, Christoph
    ARTFORUM INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 48 (05): : 16 - 18
  • [3] Logic arguments
    Palladino, Dario
    EPISTEMOLOGIA, 2011, 34 (01): : 162 - 164
  • [4] Sound arguments
    Thompson, Brad
    TPM-THE PHILOSOPHERS MAGAZINE, 2013, (63): : 121 - 122
  • [5] SOUND ARGUMENTS Respons
    Kim-Cohen, Seth
    ARTFORUM INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 48 (05): : 18 - 18
  • [6] LOGIC OF GRAMMAR OF ARGUMENTS
    VIGNAUX, G
    CAHIERS VILFREDO PARETO, 1974, 12 (32): : 167 - 182
  • [7] THE LOGIC OF REAL ARGUMENTS - FISHER,A
    MOTT, P
    PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY, 1989, 39 (156): : 370 - 373
  • [8] THE LOGIC OF REAL ARGUMENTS - FISHER,A
    LYON, A
    PHILOSOPHY, 1991, 66 (256) : 249 - 252
  • [9] On the meta-logic of arguments
    Wooldridge, Michael
    McBurney, Peter
    Parsons, Simon
    ARGUMENTATION IN MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS, 2006, 4049 : 42 - 56
  • [10] The logic of real arguments.
    Bianchi, C
    HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF LOGIC, 2006, 27 (03) : 275 - 276