Facilitating systematic reviews, data extraction and meta-analysis with the metagear package for r

被引:161
|
作者
Lajeunesse, Marc J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Florida, Dept Integrat Biol, 4202 East Fowler Ave, Tampa, FL 33620 USA
来源
METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION | 2016年 / 7卷 / 03期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
data extraction and retrieval; effect sizes; meta-analysis; MetaWin; quantitative reviews; research synthesis; systematic review; MULTIPLE IMPUTATION; INFORMATION; AGREEMENT;
D O I
10.1111/2041-210X.12472
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The r package ecosystem is rich in tools for the statistics of meta-analysis. However, there are few resources available to facilitate research synthesis as a whole. Here, I present the metagear package for r. It is a comprehensive, multifunctional toolbox with capabilities aimed to cover much of the research synthesis taxonomy: from applying a systematic review approach to objectively assemble and screen the literature, to extracting data from studies, and to finally summarize and analyse these data with the statistics of meta-analysis. Current functionalities of metagear include the following: an abstract screener GUI to efficiently sieve bibliographic information from large numbers of candidate studies; tools to assign screening effort across multiple collaborators/reviewers and to assess inter-reviewer reliability using kappa statistics; PDF downloader to automate the retrieval of journal articles from online data bases; automated data extractions from scatter-plots, box-plots and bar-plots; PRISMA flow diagrams; simple imputation tools to fill gaps in incomplete or missing study parameters; generation of random-effects sizes for Hedges' d, log response ratio, odds ratio and correlation coefficients for Monte Carlo experiments; covariance equations for modelling dependencies among multiple effect sizes (e.g. with a common control, phylogenetic correlations); and finally, summaries that replicate analyses and outputs from widely used but no longer updated meta-analysis software. Research synthesis practices are vital to many disciplines in the sciences, including ecology and evolutionary biology, and metagear aims to enrich the scope, quality and reproducibility of what can be achieved with the systematic review and meta-analysis of research outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:323 / 330
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Summarising good practice guidelines for data extraction for systematic reviews and meta-analysis
    Taylor, Kathryn S.
    Mahtani, Kamal R.
    Aronson, Jeffrey K.
    [J]. BMJ EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE, 2021, 26 (03) : 88 - 90
  • [2] Missing Data in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis
    Chandelia, Sudha
    [J]. PEDIATRIC CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2022, 23 (08) : E400 - E400
  • [3] Missing Data in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Reply
    Lehr, Anab Rebecca
    d'Astous, Soha Rached
    Tsampalieros, Anne
    Barrowman, Nick
    Menon, Kusum
    [J]. PEDIATRIC CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2022, 23 (08) : E401 - E401
  • [4] Systematic reviews and meta-analysis
    Lewis, G
    Churchill, R
    Hotopf, M
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 1997, 27 (01) : 3 - 7
  • [5] Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis
    Haase, Steven C.
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2011, 127 (02) : 955 - 966
  • [6] Systematic reviews and meta-analysis
    Askie, Lisa
    Offringa, Martin
    [J]. SEMINARS IN FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2015, 20 (06): : 403 - 409
  • [7] Systematic reviews and meta-analysis
    Hayton, Christopher J.
    [J]. RESEARCH ON SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE, 2008, 18 (05) : 525 - 526
  • [8] Systematic reviews and meta-analysis
    Gartlehner, Gerald
    Wild, Claudia
    Mad, Philipp
    [J]. WIENER MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2008, 158 (3-4) : 127 - 133
  • [9] Systematic reviews and meta-analysis
    Cook, Charlene
    [J]. CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES REVIEW, 2009, 31 (04) : 495 - 496
  • [10] Introduction to systematic reviews and meta-analysis
    McKenzie, Joanne E.
    Beller, Elaine M.
    Forbes, Andrew B.
    [J]. RESPIROLOGY, 2016, 21 (04) : 626 - 637