Gender Specific Differences in Disease Susceptibility: The Role of Epigenetics

被引:55
|
作者
Migliore, Lucia [1 ,2 ]
Nicoli, Vanessa [1 ]
Stoccoro, Andrea [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pisa, Dept Translat Res & New Surg & Med Technol, Sch Med, I-56126 Pisa, Italy
[2] Azienda Osped Univ Pisana, Dept Lab Med, I-56124 Pisa, Italy
关键词
epigenetics; gender bias; complex diseases; infectious diseases; vaccination outcomes; skewed X inactivation; escape genes; SARS-CoV-2; infection; X-CHROMOSOME INACTIVATION; SYSTEMIC-LUPUS-ERYTHEMATOSUS; DEVELOPMENTAL LEAD-EXPOSURE; ESTROGEN-RECEPTOR BETA; SEX-BASED DIFFERENCES; DNA METHYLATION; IMMUNE-RESPONSES; IMPRINTED GENES; PRENATAL STRESS; FEMALE-PATIENTS;
D O I
10.3390/biomedicines9060652
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Many complex traits or diseases, such as infectious and autoimmune diseases, cancer, xenobiotics exposure, neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative diseases, as well as the outcome of vaccination, show a differential susceptibility between males and females. In general, the female immune system responds more efficiently to pathogens. However, this can lead to over-reactive immune responses, which may explain the higher presence of autoimmune diseases in women, but also potentially the more adverse effects of vaccination in females compared with in males. Many clinical and epidemiological studies reported, for the SARS-CoV-2 infection, a gender-biased differential response; however, the majority of reports dealt with a comparable morbidity, with males, however, showing higher COVID-19 adverse outcomes. Although gender differences in immune responses have been studied predominantly within the context of sex hormone effects, some other mechanisms have been invoked: cellular mosaicism, skewed X chromosome inactivation, genes escaping X chromosome inactivation, and miRNAs encoded on the X chromosome. The hormonal hypothesis as well as other mechanisms will be examined and discussed in the light of the most recent epigenetic findings in the field, as the concept that epigenetics is the unifying mechanism in explaining gender-specific differences is increasingly emerging.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Gender differences in neurodevelopment and epigenetics
    Wilson C. J. Chung
    Anthony P. Auger
    Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology, 2013, 465 : 573 - 584
  • [2] Gender differences in neurodevelopment and epigenetics
    Chung, Wilson C. J.
    Auger, Anthony P.
    PFLUGERS ARCHIV-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY, 2013, 465 (05): : 573 - 584
  • [3] Gender differences in cancer susceptibility: role of oxidative stress
    Ali, Imran
    Hogberg, Johan
    Hsieh, Jui-Hua
    Auerbach, Scott
    Korhonen, Anna
    Stenius, Ulla
    Silins, Ilona
    CARCINOGENESIS, 2016, 37 (10) : 985 - 992
  • [4] Complex disease, gender and epigenetics
    Kaminsky, Zachary
    Wang, Sun-Chong
    Petronis, Arturas
    ANNALS OF MEDICINE, 2006, 38 (08) : 530 - 544
  • [5] The Role of Estrogen in Gender Differences in the Susceptibility to Obesity and Its Morbidities
    Stubbins, Renee E.
    Holcomb, Valerie B.
    Hong, Jina
    Kushiro, Kyoko
    Nunez, Nomeli P.
    OBESITY, 2010, 18 : S209 - S209
  • [6] Nutrition, epigenetics, and disease susceptibility.
    Jirtle, Randy L.
    JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2007, 137 (01): : 277S - 277S
  • [7] Epigenetics, imprinting, and human disease susceptibility
    Jirtle, R. L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN BIOLOGY, 2009, 21 (02) : 257 - 257
  • [8] Epigenetics: Impacts on Disease Susceptibility and Pharmacotherapy
    Abubakar, Abdullahi Rabiu
    Haque, Mainul
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH, 2016, 50 (03) : 310 - 321
  • [9] Akt like a woman - Gender differences in susceptibility to cardiovascular disease
    Sugden, PH
    Clerk, A
    CIRCULATION RESEARCH, 2001, 88 (10) : 975 - 977
  • [10] Gender-specific differences in valvular heart disease
    Nitsche, Christian
    Koschutnik, Matthias
    Kammerlander, Andreas
    Hengstenberg, Christian
    Mascherbauer, Julia
    WIENER KLINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2020, 132 (3-4) : 61 - 68