Gravity field anomalies from recent GOCE satellite-based geopotential models and terrestrial gravity data: a comparative study over Saudi Arabia

被引:5
|
作者
Alothman, Abdulaziz [1 ]
Godah, Walyeldeen [2 ]
Elsaka, Basem [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] King Abdulaziz City Sci & Technol, Geodesy & Geophys, Box 36484, Riyadh 11419, Saudi Arabia
[2] Ctr Geodesy & Geodynam, Inst Geodesy & Cartog, 27 Modzelewskiego St, PL-02679 Warsaw, Poland
[3] NRIAG, Cairo 11421, Egypt
[4] Univ Bonn, Inst Geodesy & Geoinformat, Nussallee 17, D-53115 Bonn, Germany
关键词
GOCE-based GGMs; Free air gravity anomalies; Geoid heights; Spectral enhancement method (SEM); VALIDATION; ORBIT;
D O I
10.1007/s12517-016-2393-y
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Global geopotential models (GGMs) provide important information about the Earth gravity field in terms of precise gravity anomaly, gravity disturbance, and geoid height on global and regional scales. The GGMs based on the Gravity Recovery and steady-state Ocean Circulation Explorer (GOCE) satellite gravity mission provided by the International Center for Global Earth Models (ICGEM) differ in their accuracy and spatial resolution. In this paper, we evaluate the free-air gravity anomalies and geoid heights determined from several recent GOCE-based GGMs using the corresponding gravity functions (i.e., gravity anomalies and geoid heights) obtained from the Earth Gravitational Model 2008 (EGM2008) over the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). Moreover, free-air gravity anomalies determined from GOCE-based GGMs have also been compared with the corresponding ones obtained from ground-based "terrestrial" gravity measurements over the study area. The latter comparison, using the available 3500 terrestrial gravity observations, applies the spectral enhanced method (SEM). We use the SEM to compensate the missed high-frequency component of geoid heights in GOCE-based GGMs using EGM2008 and a high-resolution digital terrain model based on the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM). The statistical comparisons of the computed results in terms of free-air gravity anomalies and geoid heights obtained from GOCE-based GGMs are in general agreement. The estimated standard deviations of differences are 5 mGal (20 cm), 6-7 mGal (2224 cm), and 8 mGal (25.9 cm) at spherical harmonic (SH) degree/order (d/o) 200, 240, and 280, respectively. Free-air gravity anomalies computed from available terrestrial gravity data, using the SEM, have been compared with the corresponding ones estimated from GOCE-based GGMs, and the results indicate an improvement over EGM2008 in the medium wavelengths. Investigation of various releases of GOCE-based GGM, up to d/o 200, reveals that the fourth and fifth releases of GOCE-based GGMs developed with the use of time-wise solution strategies (TIM_R4 and TIM_R5) approximate the gravity field well over the KSA region, since they provide the least standard deviation differences at SH. Thus, the TIM_R5 and TIM_R4 are suggested as reference models for recovering the long wavelength up to SH d/o 200 and 240, respectively, when modeling the gravimetric quasi-geoid over the KSA area.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Gravity field anomalies from recent GOCE satellite-based geopotential models and terrestrial gravity data: a comparative study over Saudi Arabia
    Abdulaziz Alothman
    Walyeldeen Godah
    Basem Elsaka
    [J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2016, 9
  • [2] Comparison of Gravity Anomalies from Recent Global Geopotential Models with Terrestrial Gravity and Airborne Gravity over Johor Region
    Rambat, Shuib
    Abdullah, Nazirah Mohamad
    Yaacob, Norehan
    Othman, Nor Azizi
    Abidin, Zainal
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED ENGINEERING, 2021, 13 (03): : 79 - 86
  • [3] Global geopotential models evaluation based on terrestrial gravity data over Ethiopia
    Alemu, Eyasu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED GEODESY, 2023, 17 (03) : 217 - 235
  • [4] Validation of GOCE global gravity field models using terrestrial gravity data in Norway
    Sprlak, M.
    Gerlach, C.
    Pettersen, B. R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEODETIC SCIENCE, 2012, 2 (02) : 134 - 143
  • [5] A Stokesian Approach for the Comparative Analysis of Satellite Gravity Models and Terrestrial Gravity Data
    Huang, Jianliang
    Veronneau, Marc
    [J]. GRAVITY, GEOID AND HEIGHT SYSTEMS, 2014, 141 : 101 - 107
  • [6] Comparison of CHAMP and GRACE geopotential models with terrestrial gravity field data in Hungary
    Tóth Gy.
    Rózsa Sz.
    [J]. Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica Hungarica, 2006, 41 (2): : 171 - 180
  • [7] Evaluation of Recent GRACE and GOCE Satellite Gravity Models and Combined Models Using GPS/Leveling and Gravity Data in China
    Li, Jiancheng
    Jiang, Weiping
    Zou, Xiancai
    Xu, Xinyu
    Shen, Wenbin
    [J]. GRAVITY, GEOID AND HEIGHT SYSTEMS, 2014, 141 : 67 - 74
  • [8] Calibration of GOCE SGG data using high–low SST, terrestrial gravity data and global gravity field models
    J. Bouman
    R. Koop
    C. C. Tscherning
    P. Visser
    [J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2004, 78 : 124 - 137
  • [9] Design and Comparison of Filters of Gravity Field Inversion from GOCE Satellite Gravity Gradient Data
    Liu, Tao
    Zhong, Bo
    Li, Xianpao
    Tan, Jiangtao
    [J]. Wuhan Daxue Xuebao (Xinxi Kexue Ban)/Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2023, 48 (05): : 694 - 701
  • [10] Quality assessment for terrestrial gravity anomalies by variance component estimation using GOCE gradiometric data and Earth's gravity models
    Eshagh, Mehdi
    Romeshkani, Mohsen
    [J]. STUDIA GEOPHYSICA ET GEODAETICA, 2013, 57 (01) : 67 - 83