Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia with early discontinuation of pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in US clinical practice

被引:13
|
作者
Weycker, Derek [1 ]
Li, Xiaoyan [2 ]
Barron, Rich [2 ]
Li, Yanli [2 ]
Reiner, Maureen [2 ]
Kartashov, Alex [1 ]
Figueredo, Jacqueline [1 ]
Tzivelekis, Spiros [2 ]
Garcia, Jacob [2 ]
机构
[1] PAI, Davis Court 4, Brookline, MA USA
[2] Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320 USA
关键词
Febrile neutropenia; Pegfilgrastim; Neulasta; Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; BREAST-CANCER; PROPENSITY SCORE; DOSE-INTENSITY; DOUBLE-BLIND; FILGRASTIM; CARE; MULTICENTER; MORTALITY; ONCOLOGY; COSTS;
D O I
10.1007/s00520-015-3039-4
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose Accumulating evidence suggests that not all cancer chemotherapy patients who receive first-cycle pegfilgrastim prophylaxis continue to receive it in subsequent cycles and that these patients may be subsequently at higher risk of febrile neutropenia (FN). Additional evidence from US clinical practice is warranted. Methods Data from two US private healthcare claims repositories were employed. The source population comprised adults who received "intermediate-risk" or "high-risk" chemotherapy regimens for solid cancers or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and first-cycle pegfilgrastim prophylaxis. From the source population, all patients who did not receive second-cycle pegfilgrastim prophylaxis ("comparison patients") were matched (1:1) to those who received it ("pegfilgrastim patients") based on cancer, regimen, and propensity score. Odds ratios (OR) for FN-broad and narrow definitions-during the second chemotherapy cycle were estimated for comparison patients versus pegfilgrastim patients using generalized estimating equations. Results A total of 2245 comparison patients (5.3 % of source population) were matched to pegfilgrastim patients; cohorts were well-balanced on baseline characteristics. Second-cycle FN incidence proportions for comparison and pegfilgrastim patients were 3.8 versus 2.2 % based on broad definition and 2.6 versus 0.8 % based on narrow definition; corresponding OR were 1.7 (95 % CI 1.2-2.5, p = 0.002) and 3.5 (95 % CI 2.0-6.0, p < 0.001). Results were similar within cancer/regimen-subgroups and were robust when using alternative methods for confounding adjustment. Conclusions In this retrospective evaluation of cancer chemotherapy patients who received first-cycle pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in US clinical practice, a clinically relevant minority did not receive second-cycle prophylaxis. Second-cycle FN odds among this subset were significantly higher than they were among those who continued prophylaxis.
引用
收藏
页码:2481 / 2490
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia with early discontinuation of pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in US clinical practice
    Derek Weycker
    Xiaoyan Li
    Rich Barron
    Yanli Li
    Maureen Reiner
    Alex Kartashov
    Jacqueline Figueredo
    Spiros Tzivelekis
    Jacob Garcia
    [J]. Supportive Care in Cancer, 2016, 24 : 2481 - 2490
  • [2] Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia (FN) with early discontinuation of pegfilgrastim prophylaxis (PEG-P) in US clinical practice.
    Weycker, Derek
    Li, Xiaoyan
    Barron, Richard L.
    Li, Yanli
    Reiner, Maureen
    Kartashov, Alex
    Figueredo, Jacqueline
    Garcia, Jacob
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (15)
  • [3] Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia by day of pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in US clinical practice from 2010 to 2015
    Weycker, Derek
    Bensink, Mark
    Lonshteyn, Alexander
    Doroff, Robin
    Chandler, David
    [J]. CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2017, 33 (12) : 2107 - 2113
  • [4] Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia with early discontinuation of pegfilgrastim prophylaxis: a retrospective evaluation using Medicare claims
    Weycker, Derek
    Hanau, Ahuva
    Lonshteyn, Alexander
    Bowers, Charles
    Garawin, Tamer
    Bensink, Mark
    Chandler, David
    [J]. CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2019, 35 (04) : 725 - 730
  • [5] Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia with early discontinuation of pegfilgrastim prophylaxis based on real-world data from 2010 to 2015
    Weycker, Derek
    Bensink, Mark
    Wu, Hongsheng
    Doroff, Robin
    Chandler, David
    [J]. CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2017, 33 (12) : 2115 - 2120
  • [6] Pegfilgrastim: a recent advance in the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia
    Waladkhani, AR
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2004, 13 (04) : 371 - 379
  • [7] Pegfilgrastim in the primary prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced severe neutropenia
    Olvera Alberto, Serrano
    Fernando, Alban
    Alberto, Villalobos
    Cwilich Raquel, Gerson
    [J]. GACETA MEXICANA DE ONCOLOGIA, 2010, 9 (01): : 3 - 10
  • [8] Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in cancer patients receiving pegfilgrastim prophylaxis: does timing of administration matter?
    Derek Weycker
    Xiaoyan Li
    Jacqueline Figueredo
    Rich Barron
    Spiros Tzivelekis
    May Hagiwara
    [J]. Supportive Care in Cancer, 2016, 24 : 2309 - 2316
  • [9] Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in cancer patients receiving pegfilgrastim prophylaxis: does timing of administration matter?
    Weycker, Derek
    Li, Xiaoyan
    Figueredo, Jacqueline
    Barron, Rich
    Tzivelekis, Spiros
    Hagiwara, May
    [J]. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2016, 24 (05) : 2309 - 2316
  • [10] Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in patients with metastatic cancer not receiving granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis in US clinical practice
    Averin, Ahuva
    Silvia, Amanda
    Lamerato, Lois
    Richert-Boe, Kathryn
    Kaur, Manpreet
    Sundaresan, Devi
    Shah, Neel
    Hatfield, Mark
    Lawrence, Tatiana
    Lyman, Gary H.
    Weycker, Derek
    [J]. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2021, 29 (04) : 2179 - 2186