A Comprehensive Information Technology System to Support Physician Learning at the Point of Care

被引:23
|
作者
Cook, David A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Sorensen, Kristi J. [4 ]
Nishimura, Rick A. [1 ,5 ]
Ommen, Steve R. [1 ,5 ]
Lloyd, Farrell J. [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin Coll Med, Dept Med, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin Coll Med, Mayo Clin Online Learning, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[3] Mayo Clin Coll Med, Knowledge Delivery Ctr, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[4] Mayo Clin Coll Med, Knowledge Delivery Ctr, Knowledge Management Technol Unit, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[5] Mayo Clin Coll Med, Knowledge Delivery Ctr, MayoExpert, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[6] Mayo Clin Coll Med, Knowledge Delivery Ctr, Wisdom Lab, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
关键词
CLINICAL QUESTIONS; KNOWLEDGE RESOURCE; CERTIFICATION; MAINTENANCE; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1097/ACM.0000000000000551
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
MayoExpert is a multifaceted information system integrated with the electronic medical record (EMR) across Mayo Clinic's multisite health system. It was developed as a technology-based solution to manage information, standardize clinical practice, and promote and document learning in clinical contexts. Features include urgent test result notifications; models illustrating expert-approved care processes; concise, expert-approved answers to frequently asked questions (FAQs); a directory of topic-specific experts; and a portfolio for provider licensure and credentialing. The authors evaluate MayoExpert's reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance. Evaluation data sources included usage statistics, user surveys, and pilot studies. As of October 2013, MayoExpert was available at 94 clinical sites in 12 states and contained 1,368 clinical topics, answers to 7,640 FAQs, and 92 care process models. In 2012, MayoExpert was accessed at least once by 2,578/3,643 (71%) staff physicians, 900/1,374 (66%) midlevel providers, and 1,728/2,291 (75%) residents and fellows. In a 2013 survey of MayoExpert users with 536 respondents, all features were highly rated (>= 67% favorable). More providers reported using MayoExpert to answer questions before/after than during patient visits (68% versus 36%). During November 2012 to April 2013, MayoExpert sent 1,660 notifications of new-onset atrial fibrillation and 1,590 notifications of prolonged QT. MayoExpert has become part of routine clinical and educational operations, and its care process models now define Mayo Clinic best practices. MayoExpert's infrastructure and content will continue to expand with improved templates and content organization, new care process models, additional notifications, better EMR integration, and improved support for credentialing activities.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 39
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Physician Views on a Computerized Decision Support System for Home Care Information Exchange
    Nova, Amanda A.
    Zarrin, Aein
    Heckman, George A. W.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION, 2020, 21 (03) : 426 - +
  • [2] Information technology support for the learning organisation
    Brooks, L
    Webb, H
    METHODOLOGIES FOR DEVELOPING AND MANAGING EMERGING TECHNOLOGY BASED INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 1999, : 217 - 229
  • [3] Physician Clinical Information Technology and Health Care Disparities
    Ketcham, Jonathan D.
    Lutfey, Karen E.
    Gerstenberger, Eric
    Link, Carol L.
    McKinlay, John B.
    MEDICAL CARE RESEARCH AND REVIEW, 2009, 66 (06) : 658 - 681
  • [4] Learning, understanding and the use of information technology: a survey study among primary care physician trainees
    Wensing, Michel
    Paech, Barbara
    Roth, Catharina
    Schwill, Simon
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2019, 19 (01)
  • [5] Learning, understanding and the use of information technology: a survey study among primary care physician trainees
    Michel Wensing
    Barbara Paech
    Catharina Roth
    Simon Schwill
    BMC Health Services Research, 19
  • [6] Overcoming information overload: an information system for the primary care physician
    Barnett, GO
    Barry, MJ
    Robb-Nicholson, C
    Morgan, M
    MEDINFO 2004: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 11TH WORLD CONGRESS ON MEDICAL INFORMATICS, PT 1 AND 2, 2004, 107 : 273 - 276
  • [7] A VISION OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT FOR DIABETES CARE
    BINDER, C
    CARSON, ER
    CAREY, S
    CAVAN, D
    CAVAN, M
    DAY, J
    DEUTSCH, T
    FLETCHER, L
    GALLEGO, MR
    HERNANDEZ, R
    HEJLESEN, O
    HOVORKA, R
    KLEINEBREIT, L
    KRANS, M
    BENEDETTI, MM
    MEEKING, D
    METCALFE, J
    NIELSEN, LH
    REBOLDI, GP
    SODEN, P
    SONKSEN, PH
    SORENSEN, JP
    STORMS, GEMG
    TESONE, P
    VAUGHAN, NJA
    WILLIAMS, CD
    PIWERNETZ, K
    ENGELBRECHT, R
    FISHER, U
    JERSCH, N
    CRAMP, D
    LEICESTER, H
    ANDREASSEN, S
    MAGNUSSEN, O
    CHECKLEY, K
    LAWRENCE, L
    DIABETES NUTRITION & METABOLISM, 1995, 8 (04) : 205 - 214
  • [8] Health information technology and physician perceptions of quality of care and satisfaction
    Davis, Karen
    Doty, Michelle McEvoy
    Shea, Katherine
    Stremikis, Kristof
    HEALTH POLICY, 2009, 90 (2-3) : 239 - 246
  • [9] Physician practice revenues and use of information technology in patient care
    Furukawa, Michael F.
    Ketcham, Jonathan D.
    Rimsza, Mary E.
    MEDICAL CARE, 2007, 45 (02) : 168 - 176
  • [10] INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TRAINING FOR HEALTH-CARE - INFORMATION SUPPORT
    KOSTREWSKI, B
    DHONSI, U
    MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 1992, 17 (01): : 65 - 70