Modeling Emergency Managers' Hurricane Evacuation Decisions

被引:8
|
作者
Gudishala, Ravindra [1 ]
Wilmot, Chester [1 ]
机构
[1] Louisiana State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Patrick F Taylor Hall,Room 3255, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
关键词
D O I
10.3141/2604-10
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Emergency management and decision support system (EMDSS) tools play an important role in assisting emergency managers with making important decisions about the movement of people to safety when a jurisdiction is threatened by a storm. One of the important components of an EMDSS is an evacuation demand model that predicts whether and when households will evacuate when they are threatened by a storm. A critical input to that model is an emergency manager's decision to issue an evacuation notice. No existing mathematical models predict whether and when an emergency manager will issue an evacuation notice on the basis of a hurricane forecast and other contextual factors. To fill this gap, this research study sought to develop a model that would predict if and when an emergency manager would issue an evacuation notice when a jurisdiction was threatened by a storm. Data from poststorm assessment surveys and newspaper archives were used to retrieve past decisions made by evacuation managers for five storms in 45 coastal counties or parishes. The data were then used to develop a discrete choice model by use of the time-dependent sequential logit paradigm. Five independent predictor variables-storm surge, clearance time, time to landfall, hurricane category, and time of day-were found to be good predictors of the decisions made by emergency managers. This model could be useful to emergency managers to estimate how other emergency managers decide to evacuate an area when they are faced with an evacuation decision. The model could also benefit researchers and practitioners engaged in modeling and understanding hurricane evacuation behavior.
引用
收藏
页码:82 / 87
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Modeling joint evacuation decisions in social networks: The case of Hurricane Sandy
    Sadri, Arif Mohaimin
    Ukkusuri, Satish V.
    Gladwin, Hugh
    JOURNAL OF CHOICE MODELLING, 2017, 25 : 50 - 60
  • [2] Public evacuation decisions and hurricane track uncertainty
    Regnier, Eva
    MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2008, 54 (01) : 16 - 28
  • [3] FORMALIZATION OF EMERGENCY EVACUATION DECISIONS
    DIX, T
    KENARANGUI, R
    VALFELLS, A
    MCLAGAN, G
    HUSSEINY, A
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN NUCLEAR SOCIETY, 1980, 35 (NOV): : 46 - 48
  • [4] Modeling the hurricane evacuation response curve
    Fu, Haoqiang
    Wilmot, Chester G.
    Zhang, Hong
    Baker, Earl J.
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2007, (2022) : 94 - 102
  • [5] Predictors of hurricane evacuation decisions: A meta-analysis
    Tanim, Shakhawat H.
    Wiernik, Brenton M.
    Reader, Steven
    Hu, Yujie
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 79
  • [6] Modeling the dynamics of hurricane evacuation decisions from twitter data: An input output hidden markov modeling approach
    Roy, Kamol Chandra
    Hasan, Samiul
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART C-EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2021, 123
  • [7] Hospital Evacuation Decisions in Emergency Situations
    Hassol, Andrea
    Biddinger, Paul
    Zane, Richard
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2013, 309 (15): : 1585 - 1586
  • [8] Understanding the Decision-Making Process for Hurricane Evacuation Orders: A Case Study of Florida County Emergency Managers
    Iman, Sara
    Ge, Yue
    Klenow, Daniel J.
    Savitt, Amanda
    Murray-Tuite, Pamela
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (24)
  • [9] Previous hurricane evacuation decisions and future evacuation intentions among residents of southeast Louisiana
    Meyer, Michelle Annette
    Mitchell, Brant
    Purdum, J. Carlee
    Breen, Kyle
    Iles, Robert L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2018, 31 : 1231 - 1244
  • [10] Evacuee Route Choice Decisions in a Dynamic Hurricane Evacuation Context
    Robinson, R. Michael
    Khattak, Asad
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2012, (2312) : 141 - 149