A life-cycle approach to species barriers

被引:0
|
作者
Johannesson, Kerstin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gothenburg, Dept Marine Sci, Tjarno, Stromstad, Sweden
关键词
Ectocarpus; haploid-diploid generations; intrinsic barrier; speciation; SPECIATION;
D O I
10.1111/mec.14168
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
What maintains reproductive barriers between closely related species is, of course, of fundamental interest to a closer understanding of the mechanisms that generate new biodiversity. One important dichotomy is to separate barriers evolved from divergent selection over environmental gradients (extrinsic barriers) from barriers caused by incompatibilities between different genetic arrangements that may have evolved in isolation (intrinsic barriers). This dichotomy also reflects an important applied consequence. As the extrinsic barriers are associated with specific environmental contexts, they may be partly or completely erased if the environment changes. In contrast, intrinsic barriers are inert to the environmental context and resistant to environmental changes. From a conservation biology perspective, it may thus be important to be able to separate extrinsic and intrinsic species barriers, but this may in many organisms be a complex matter. In this issue of Molecular Ecology, Montecinos et al. (2017) found a tractable approach that works for species with life cycles that include two reproductive but ecologically similar generations, one haploid and the other diploid. What they demonstrate is that using a life-cycle approach offers a unique possibility to separate between prezygotic and postzygotic barriers. Indeed, in the case of an isomorphic life cycle, there is even a possibility to suggest whether postzygotic barriers are more likely to be intrinsic or extrinsic. In this way, their approach may be useful both to increase our understanding of the basic mechanisms of speciation and to single out when species barriers will better resist environmental changes.
引用
收藏
页码:3321 / 3323
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A life-cycle approach
    Cosman, EC
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2000, 107 (13) : 82 - 87
  • [2] Life-Cycle Cost Analyses for Road Barriers
    Karim, H.
    Magnusson, R.
    Natanaelsson, K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, 2012, 138 (07) : 830 - 851
  • [3] Adenomyosis: a life-cycle approach
    Benagiano, Giuseppe
    Brosens, Ivo
    Habiba, Marwan
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2015, 30 (03) : 220 - 232
  • [4] A LIFE-CYCLE APPROACH IN BUILDING
    BEKKER, PCF
    [J]. BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 1982, 17 (01) : 55 - 61
  • [5] LIFE-CYCLE OF A NEW SPECIES OF HEPATOZOON
    BASHTAR, AR
    MEHLHORN, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROTOZOOLOGY, 1983, 30 (03): : A49 - A49
  • [6] The life-cycle of merge conflicts: processes, barriers, and strategies
    Nicholas Nelson
    Caius Brindescu
    Shane McKee
    Anita Sarma
    Danny Dig
    [J]. Empirical Software Engineering, 2019, 24 : 2863 - 2906
  • [7] The life-cycle of merge conflicts: processes, barriers, and strategies
    Nelson, Nicholas
    Brindescu, Caius
    McKee, Shane
    Sarma, Anita
    Dig, Danny
    [J]. EMPIRICAL SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 2019, 24 (05) : 2863 - 2906
  • [8] A PROBABILISTIC APPROACH TO LIFE-CYCLE COSTING
    NAGEL, PJA
    BLANCHARD, BS
    [J]. SOUTH AFRICAN STATISTICAL JOURNAL, 1987, 21 (02) : 187 - 188
  • [9] LIFE-CYCLE APPROACH TO RETIREMENT INCOME
    KREPS, J
    [J]. GERIATRICS, 1965, 20 (07) : A52 - &
  • [10] LIFE-CYCLE COSTING - AN APPROACH TO METHOD
    PERKINS, B
    [J]. ARCHITECTURAL RECORD, 1975, 158 (02) : 53 - &