Pitfalls and challenges when assessing the depth of hypnosis during general anaesthesia by clinical signs and electronic indices

被引:44
|
作者
Jensen, EW
Litvan, H
Struys, M
Vazquez, PM
机构
[1] Hosp Santa Creu & Sant Pau, Dept Cardiac Anaesthesia, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Danmeter AS, Res Sect, Odense, Denmark
[3] Hosp Santa Creu & Sant Pau, Postoperat Intens Care Unit, Barcelona, Spain
[4] Ghent Univ Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
关键词
auditory evoked potentials; Bispectral index; depth of hypnosis; general anaesthesia; monitoring;
D O I
10.1111/j.1399-6576.2004.00521.x
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
The objective of this article was to review the present methods used for validating the depth of hypnosis. We introduce three concepts, the real depth of hypnosis (DHreal), the observed depth of hypnosis (DHobs), and the electronic indices of depth of hypnosis (DHel-ind). The DHreal is the real state of hypnosis that the patient has in a given moment during the general anaesthesia. The DHobs is the subjective assessment of the anaesthesiologist based on clinical signs. The DHel-ind is any estimation of the depth of hypnosis given by an electronic device. The three entities DHreal, DHobs and DHel-ind should in the ideal situation be identical. However, this is rarely the case. The correlation between the DHobs and the DHel-ind can be affected by a number of factors such as the stimuli used for the assessment of the level of consciousness or the administration of analgesic agents or neuro muscular blocking agents. Opioids, for example, can block the response to tactile and noxious stimuli, and even the response to verbal command could vanish, hence deeming the patient in a lower depth of hypnosis than the real patient state. The DHel-ind can be disturbed by the presence of facial muscular activity. In conclusion, although several monitors and clinical scoring scales are available to assess the depth of hypnosis during general anaesthesia, care should be taken when interpreting their results.
引用
收藏
页码:1260 / 1267
页数:8
相关论文
共 5 条
  • [1] Comparison of two depth of anaesthesia monitors during general anaesthesia: Electrophysiological and clinical assessment
    Molnar, Cs
    Kovacs, Zs
    Simon, E.
    Gal, J.
    Mikos, B.
    Fuelesdi, B.
    ACTA PHYSIOLOGICA HUNGARICA, 2012, 99 (02) : 111 - 117
  • [2] Assessing Depth of Hypnosis with the NeuroSENSE monitor during Desflurane General Anesthesia - Randomized Trial
    Gorges, Matthias
    West, Nicholas
    Cooke, Erin
    Pi, Shanshan
    Brant, Rollin
    Dumont, Guy A.
    Ansermino, J. Mark
    Merchant, Richard N.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2019, 128
  • [3] Correlation between clinical signs of depth of anaesthesia and cerebral state index responses in dogs during induction of anaesthesia with propofol
    Ribeiro, L. M.
    Ferreira, D. A.
    Bras, S.
    Castro, A.
    Nunes, C. A.
    Amorim, P.
    Antunes, L. M.
    RESEARCH IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2009, 87 (02) : 287 - 291
  • [4] Comparison of the Conox (qCON) and Sedline (PSI) depth of anaesthesia indices to predict the hypnotic effect during desflurane general anaesthesia with ketamine
    Catherine Christenson
    Pablo Martinez-Vazquez
    Max Breidenstein
    Borzoo Farhang
    Jackson Mathews
    Umberto Melia
    Erik Weber Jensen
    Donald Mathews
    Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 2021, 35 : 1421 - 1428
  • [5] Comparison of the Conox (qCON) and Sedline (PSI) depth of anaesthesia indices to predict the hypnotic effect during desflurane general anaesthesia with ketamine
    Christenson, Catherine
    Martinez-Vazquez, Pablo
    Breidenstein, Max
    Farhang, Borzoo
    Mathews, Jackson
    Melia, Umberto
    Jensen, Erik Weber
    Mathews, Donald
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING AND COMPUTING, 2021, 35 (06) : 1421 - 1428