共 50 条
A randomized investigator-blinded study comparing pimecrolimus cream 1% with tacrolimus ointment 0.03% in the treatment of pediatric patients with moderate atopic dermatitis
被引:85
|作者:
Kempers, S
Boguniewicz, M
Carter, E
Jarratt, M
Pariser, D
Stewart, D
Stiller, M
Tschen, E
Chon, K
Wisseh, S
Abrams, B
机构:
[1] Minnesota Clin Study Ctr, Fridley, MN 55432 USA
[2] Natl Jewish Med & Res Ctr, Dept Pediat, Div Pulm Med, Denver, CO USA
[3] Columbia Univ, Presbyterian Hosp, Dept Dermatol, Clin Pharmacol Unit, New York, NY 10027 USA
[4] DermRes Inc, Austin, TX USA
[5] Eastern Virginia Med Sch, Dept Dermatol, Norfolk, VA 23501 USA
[6] Virginia Clin Res Inc, Clinton Township, MI USA
[7] Midw Cutaneous Res, Albuquerque, NM USA
[8] Acad Dermatol Associates, E Hanover, NJ USA
[9] Novartis Pharmaceut Corp, E Hanover, NJ USA
基金:
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词:
D O I:
10.1016/j.jaad.2004.01.051
中图分类号:
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号:
100206 ;
摘要:
Objective: To evaluate pimecrolimus cream 1% and tacrolimus ointment 0.03% in pediatric patients with moderate atopic dermatitis (AD). Methods: 141 patients (aged 2-17 years) were randomized to treatment with pimecrolimus cream 1% (n = 71) or tacrolimus ointment 0.03% (n = 70) twice daily for 6 weeks. Results: At clay 4, local, application-site reactions were less common and of shorter duration with pimecrolimus than with tacrolimus. Incidence of erythema/irritation was 8% (6/71) with pimecrolimus compared with 19% (13/70) with tacrolimus (P = .039). Fewer patients receiving pimecrolimus (0%, 0/6) experienced erythema/irritation lasting > 30 minutes, compared with those receiving tacrolimus (85%, 11/13; P < .001). Fewer patients reported itching with pimecrolimus (8%; 6/71) than with tacrolimus (20%; 14/70; P = .073). Incidence of warmth, stinging, and burning was similar in both groups; however, reactions lasting > 30 minutes were fewer with pimecrolimus (0%, 0/14) than with tacrolimus (67%, 8/12; P < .001). More patients receiving pimecrolimus rated ease of application as 'excellent' or 'very good', compared with tacrolimus (76% vs 59%, respectively; P < .020). Efficacy was similar in both groups at day 43. Both treatments were generally well tolerated with no unexpected adverse events. Conclusion: Pimecrolimus cream 1% had better formulation attributes and local tolerability than tacrolimus ointment 0.03% while providing similar efficacy and overall safety in pediatric patients with moderate AD.
引用
收藏
页码:515 / 525
页数:11
相关论文